Case history of a cost‐effective 3‐D seismic survey over the Perth Basin, Western Australia

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon C. Stewart ◽  
Brian Evans
1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
S.C. Stewart ◽  
B.J. Evans

As part of an industry funded research project into the application of the technique of LOFOLD3D land seismic surveying, a four fold three dimensional seismic survey was performed in the Perth Basin at Moora, Western Australia in July 1987. The volume covered an area of four kilometres by just under two kilometres, producing a total of 23,000 common midpoint traces. The objective was to collect and process the data in such a manner that a three dimensional structural interpretation would result, which would be the same as that resulting from a conventional three dimensional survey. A cost comparison indicates that a commercial LOFOLD3D survey would reduce the cost of performing a land 3D survey to an estimated 20% of the full fold equivalent, and the technique therefore offers potential for substantial savings if it is adopted on a commercial basis.


1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Hampson ◽  
Terje Hansen ◽  
H. Jakubowicz ◽  
John V. Kingston

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
James Reid ◽  
David Price ◽  
Edward Summerhayes

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Dammer ◽  
Jebco Seismic ◽  
Frank P. Locascio ◽  
Joe I. Sanders ◽  
Joel G. Starr

1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Johnstone

Rough Range No. 1 was the first well to be drilled for oil in Western Australia in the post-war period. It was spudded on September 5th, 1953. At a depth of 1100m, the well encountered a flow of oil at a rate of 500 bbls per day from the Early Cretaceous Birdrong Sandstone. This first discovery of flowing oil in Australia set off a boom in exploration for oil that rivalled the gold mining booms of the last century. The discovery well was drilled for a total of 20 months, encountering a section of Tertiary, Cretaceous, Jurassic, Permian, and Carboniferous -? Devonian rocks. By May 1955, when Rough Range No. 1 was terminated, a further seven wells had been drilled on the Rough Range Anticline and all were dry. Late in 1955, Rough Range -9 was drilled but also proved dry. Rough Range-10 was drilled less than 200m from the discovery well but only found a thin, non-commercial pay zone.Studies of the Rough Range structure, incorporating data from all of the wells and the intense seismic mapping of the feature show that the area of closure is very small and the total accumulation could not be more than 282,000 bbls of oil in place in the reservoir.Assuming a 30% recovery factor, the accumulation is capable of producing approximately 84,600 bbls. Of this, 16,900 bbls has already been produced in a 48-day production test of Rough Range-1 A in 1955. WAPET believes that the small remaining reserves, even at world parity pricing, are not economically viable.Although the small accumulation at Rough Range No. 1 was a disappointment to WAPET, this first post-war oil well proved to be a "lucky break" and a big stimulus for oil exploration in Australia.


Author(s):  
J. V. Kingston ◽  
G. Hampson ◽  
T. Hansen ◽  
H. Jakubowicz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document