Appendix I. Delineation of a diagenetic trap using P-wave and converted-wave seismic data in the Miocene McLure Shale, San Joaquin Basin, CA

2016 ◽  
pp. 533-536
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
San Joaquin Basin

Delineation of a diagenetic trap using P‐wave and converted‐wave seismic data in the Miocene

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
McLure Shale ◽  
Robert Kidney ◽  
Robert Sterling ◽  
Anne Grau ◽  
John Arestad
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Converted Wave

Converted-wave model building and imaging based on common-focus-point methodology

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. U139-U149
Author(s):  
Hongwei Liu ◽  
Mustafa Naser Al-Ali ◽  
Yi Luo
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
Seismic Images ◽  
Focus Point

Seismic images can be viewed as photographs for underground rocks. These images can be generated from different reflections of elastic waves with different rock properties. Although the dominant seismic data processing is still based on the acoustic wave assumption, elastic wave processing and imaging have become increasingly popular in recent years. A major challenge in elastic wave processing is shear-wave (S-wave) velocity model building. For this reason, we have developed a sequence of procedures for estimating seismic S-wave velocities and the subsequent generation of seismic images using converted waves. We have two main essential new supporting techniques. The first technique is the decoupling of the S-wave information by generating common-focus-point gathers via application of the compressional-wave (P-wave) velocity on the converted seismic data. The second technique is to assume one common VP/ VS ratio to approximate two types of ratios, namely, the ratio of the average earth layer velocity and the ratio of the stacking velocity. The benefit is that we reduce two unknown ratios into one, so it can be easily scanned and picked in practice. The PS-wave images produced by this technology could be aligned with the PP-wave images such that both can be produced in the same coordinate system. The registration between the PP and PS images provides cross-validation of the migrated structures and a better estimation of underground rock and fluid properties. The S-wave velocity, computed from the picked optimal ratio, can be used not only for generating the PS-wave images, but also to ensure well registration between the converted-wave and P-wave images.

Wavelet distortion correction due to domain conversion

Geophysics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. V77-V87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishi Bansal ◽  
Mike Matheney
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Distortion Correction ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
Shaping Filter ◽  
Seismic Wavelet ◽  
Attribute Analysis ◽  
P Wave Velocity

Converted-wave (PS) data, when converted to PP time, develop time- and location-varying compression of the seismic wavelet due to a variable subsurface [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text]. The time-dependent compression distorts the wavelet in a seismic trace. The lack of a consistent seismic wavelet in a domain-converted PS volume can eventually lead to an erroneous joint PP/PS inversion result. Depth-converted seismic data also have wavelet distortion due to velocity-dependent wavelet stretch. A high value of seismic velocity produces more stretch in a seismic wavelet than a low value. Variable wavelet stretch renders the depth data unsuitable for attribute analysis. A filtering scheme is proposed that corrects for distortion in seismic wavelets due to domain conversions (PS to PP time and time-to-depth) of seismic data in an amplitude-preserving manner. The method uses a Fourier scaling theorem to predict the seismic wavelet in the converted domain and calculates a shaping filter for each time/depth sample that corrects for the distortion in the wavelet. The filter is applied to the domain-converted data using the method of nonstationary filtering. We provide analytical expressions for the squeeze factor [Formula: see text] that is used to predict the wavelet in the converted domain. The squeeze factor [Formula: see text] for PS to PP time conversion is a function of the subsurface [Formula: see text] whereas for PP time-to-depth conversion [Formula: see text] is dependent on subsurface P-wave velocity. After filtering, the squeezed wavelets in domain-converted PS data appear to have resulted from a constant subsurface [Formula: see text], which we denote as [Formula: see text]. Similarly, the filtered depth-converted data appear to have resulted from a constant subsurface P-wave velocity [Formula: see text].

Predicting reservoir quality in the Bakken Formation, North Dakota, using petrophysics and 3C seismic data

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. T851-T868
Author(s):  
Andrea G. Paris ◽  
Robert R. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
North Dakota ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Well Logs ◽  
Reservoir Quality ◽  
Bakken Formation ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
Wave Velocities

Combining rock-property analysis with multicomponent seismic imaging can be an effective approach for reservoir quality prediction in the Bakken Formation, North Dakota. The hydrocarbon potential of shale is indicated on well logs by low density, high gamma-ray response, low compressional-wave (P-wave) and shear-wave (S-wave) velocities, and high neutron porosity. We have recognized the shale intervals by cross plotting sonic velocities versus density. Intervals with total organic carbon (TOC) content higher than 10 wt% deviate from lower TOC regions in the density domain and exhibit slightly lower velocities and densities (<2.30 g/cm3). We consider TOC to be the principal factor affecting changes in the density and P- and S-wave velocities in the Bakken shales, where VP/ VS ranges between 1.65 and 1.75. We generate the synthetic seismic data using an anisotropic version of the Zoeppritz equations, including estimated Thomsen’s parameters. For the tops of the Upper and Lower Bakken, the amplitude shows a negative intercept and a positive gradient, which corresponds to an amplitude variation with offset of class IV. The P-impedance error decreases by 14% when incorporating the converted-wave information in the inversion process. A statistical approach using multiattribute analysis and neural networks delimits the zones of interest in terms of P-impedance, density, TOC content, and brittleness. The inverted and predicted results show reasonable correlations with the original well logs. The integration of well log analysis, rock physics, seismic modeling, constrained inversions, and statistical predictions contributes to identifying the areas of highest reservoir quality within the Bakken Formation.

Estimating shear‐wave velocities from P-wave and converted‐wave data

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 504-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklyn K. Levin
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
Wave Data ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Shear Wave Velocities ◽  
P Wave Velocity ◽  
Growing Body

Tessmer and Behle (1988) show that S-wave velocity can be estimated from surface seismic data if both normal P-wave data and converted‐wave data (P-SV) are available. The relation of Tessmer and Behle is [Formula: see text] (1) where [Formula: see text] is the S-wave velocity, [Formula: see text] is the P-wave velocity, and [Formula: see text] is the converted‐wave velocity. The growing body of converted‐wave data suggest a brief examination of the validity of equation (1) for velocities that vary with depth.

Feasibility study of fracture interpretation using multicomponent seismic data: SEAM II Barrett model

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-52
Author(s):  
Youfang Liu ◽  
James Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Azimuthal Anisotropy ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Lateral Velocity ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Velocity Anisotropy ◽  
1D Model

Several P-wave azimuthal anisotropy studies have been conducted for the SEAM II Barrett model data. However, these analyses provide fracture property estimation that is inconsistent with the actual model properties. Therefore, we perform a feasibility study to understand the influence of the overburden and reservoir properties, and the processing and inversion steps, which together determine the success of the fracture interpretation from seismic data. 1D model properties (orthorhombic for both overburden and reservoir) are first extracted from the actual Barrett model properties at two locations. Anisotropic prestack reflectivity modeling exposes the true orthorhombic response of the 1D medium in the form of Common Offset and Common Azimuth (COCA) gathers. The true anisotropic response is obscured in the Barrett data (generated by finite element modeling) due to the mild lateral velocity variations and orthorhombic anisotropy in the overburden. We then expose the reservoir anisotropic response by using an isotropic overburden in the reflectivity modeling. This shows that the P-wave VVAZ responses generated by the reservoir itself are weak, which leads to an unstable VVAZ inversion to estimate the interval NMO velocity anisotropy. The reservoir thickness (125m or 65ms TWT) or NMO velocity anisotropy (6-7%) needs to be at least doubled to obtain a stable VVAZ inversion. Anisotropic geometrical-spreading correction improves the amplitude-versus-azimuth (AVAZ) inversion results when reflectivity modeling models orthorhombic overburden. The converted wave ( C-wave) has a stronger VVAZ response compared to the P-wave. We suggest that the C-wave data could be useful to constrain fracture interpretation in the Barrett model. We conclude that the results of previous studies are due to the combination of the residual influence of overburden after processing and imaging, and the weak anisotropy responses from the reservoir.

scholarly journals Three-component amplitude versus offset analysis

1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
D.R. Miles ◽  
G. Gassaway ◽  
L. Bennett ◽  
R. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Converted Wave ◽  
P Waves ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Avo Analysis ◽  
Avo Inversion ◽  
Amplitude Versus Offset ◽  
Converted Waves

Three-component (3-C) amplitude versus offset (AVO) inversion is the AVO analysis of the three major energies in the seismic data, P-waves, S-waves and converted waves. For each type of energy the reflection coefficients at the boundary are a function of the contrast across the boundary in velocity, density and Poisson's ratio, and of the angle of incidence of the incoming wave. 3-C AVO analysis exploits these relationships to analyse the AVO changes in the P, S, and converted waves. 3-C AVO analysis is generally done on P, S, and converted wave data collected from a single source on 3-C geophones. Since most seismic sources generate both P and S-waves, it follows that most 3-C seismic data may be used in 3-C AVO inversion. Processing of the P-wave, S-wave and converted wave gathers is nearly the same as for single-component P-wave gathers. In split-spread shooting, the P-wave and S-wave energy on the radial component is one polarity on the forward shot and the opposite polarity on the back shot. Therefore to use both sides of the shot, the back shot must be rotated 180 degrees before it can be stacked with the forward shot. The amplitude of the returning energy is a function of all three components, not just the vertical or radial, so all three components must be stacked for P-waves, then for S-waves, and finally for converted waves. After the gathers are processed, reflectors are picked and the amplitudes are corrected for free-surface effects, spherical divergence and the shot and geophone array geometries. Next the P and S-wave interval velocities are calculated from the P and S-wave moveouts. Then the amplitude response of the P and S-wave reflections are analysed to give Poisson's ratio. The two solutions are then compared and adjusted until they match each other and the data. Three-component AVO inversion not only yields information about the lithologies and pore-fluids at a specific location; it also provides the interpreter with good correlations between the P-waves and the S-waves, and between the P and converted waves, thus greatly expanding the value of 3-C seismic data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document