Velocity model building from waveform tomography of band limited reflection seismic data

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuhao Qin ◽  
Tong W. Fei ◽  
Yi Luo
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
Waveform Tomography ◽  
Band Limited

From time to depth with CRS attributes

Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. S151-S155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Baykulov ◽  
Stefan Dümmong ◽  
Dirk Gajewski
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Alternative Processing ◽  
Multiple Attenuation ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
Data Regularization ◽  
Common Reflection Surface

A processing workflow was introduced for reflection seismic data that is based entirely on common-reflection-surface (CRS) stacking attributes. This workflow comprises the CRS stack, multiple attenuation, velocity model building, prestack data enhancement, trace interpolation, and data regularization. Like other methods, its limitation is the underlying hyperbolic assumption. The CRS workflow provides an alternative processing path in case conventional common midpoint (CMP) processing is unsatisfactory. Particularly for data with poor signal-to-noise ratio and low-fold acquisition, the CRS workflow is advantageous. The data regularization feature and the ability of prestack data enhancement provide quality control in velocity model building and improve prestack depth-migrated images.

Full Wavefield Redatuming: Accurate Velocity Modelling for Imaging Beneath Complex Overburden

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farah Syazana Dzulkefli ◽  
Kefeng Xin ◽  
Ahmad Riza Ghazali ◽  
Guo Qiang ◽  
Tariq Alkhalifah
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Surrounding Rock ◽  
Target Area ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
Seismic Image ◽  
Seismic Wavefield

Abstract Salt is known for having a generally low density and higher velocity compared with the surrounding rock layers which causes the energy to scatter once the seismic wavefield hits the salt body and relatively less energy is transmitted through the salt to the deeper subsurface. As a result, most of imaging approaches are unable to image the base of the salt and the reservoir below the salt. Even the velocity model building such as FWI often fails to illuminate the deeper parts of salt area. In this paper, we show that Full Wavefield Redatuming (FWR) is used to retrieved and enhance the seismic data below the salt area, leading to a better seismic image quality and allowing us to focus on updating the velocity in target area below the salt. However, this redatuming approach requires a good overburden velocity model to retrieved good redatumed data. Thus, by using synthetic SEAM model, our objective is to study on the accuracy of the overburden velocity model required for imaging beneath complex overburden. The results show that the kinematic components of wave propagation are preserved through redatuming even with heavily smoothed overburden velocity model.

Seismic Velocity Model Building Using Neural Networks: Training Data Design and Learning Generalization

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-73
Author(s):  
Hani Alzahrani ◽  
Jeffrey Shragge
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Training Process ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
Layer Velocity

Data-driven artificial neural networks (ANNs) offer a number of advantages over conventional deterministic methods in a wide range of geophysical problems. For seismic velocity model building, judiciously trained ANNs offer the possibility of estimating high-resolution subsurface velocity models. However, a significant challenge of ANNs is training generalization, which is the ability of an ANN to apply the learning from the training process to test data not previously encountered. In the context of velocity model building, this means learning the relationship between velocity models and the corresponding seismic data from a set of training data, and then using acquired seismic data to accurately estimate unknown velocity models. We ask the following question: what type of velocity model structures need be included in the training process so that the trained ANN can invert seismic data from a different (hypothetical) geological setting? To address this question, we create four sets of training models: geologically inspired and purely geometrical, both with and without background velocity gradients. We find that using geologically inspired training data produce models with well-delineated layer interfaces and fewer intra-layer velocity variations. The absence of a certain geological structure in training models, though, hinders the ANN's ability to recover it in the testing data. We use purely geometric training models consisting of square blocks of varying size to demonstrate the ability of ANNs to recover reasonable approximations of flat, dipping, and curved interfaces. However, the predicted models suffer from intra-layer velocity variations and non-physical artifacts. Overall, the results successfully demonstrate the use of ANNs in recovering accurate velocity model estimates, and highlight the possibility of using such an approach for the generalized seismic velocity inversion problem.

The Wolfspar experience with low-frequency seismic source field data: Motivation, processing, and implications

2022 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-18
Author(s):  
Andrew Brenders ◽  
Joe Dellinger ◽  
Imtiaz Ahmed ◽  
Esteban Díaz ◽  
Mariana Gherasim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Seismic Source ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Seismic Sources ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
Air Gun

The promise of fully automatic full-waveform inversion (FWI) — a (seismic) data-driven velocity model building process — has proven elusive in complex geologic settings, with impactful examples using field data unavailable until recently. In 2015, success with FWI at the Atlantis Field in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico demonstrated that semiautomatic velocity model building is possible, but it also raised the question of what more might be possible if seismic data tailor-made for FWI were available (e.g., with increased source-receiver offsets and bespoke low-frequency seismic sources). Motivated by the initial value case for FWI in settings such as the Gulf of Mexico, beginning in 2007 and continuing into 2021 BP designed, built, and field tested Wolfspar, an ultralow-frequency seismic source designed to produce seismic data tailor-made for FWI. A 3D field trial of Wolfspar was conducted over the Mad Dog Field in the Gulf of Mexico in 2017–2018. Low-frequency source (LFS) data were shot on a sparse grid (280 m inline, 2 to 4 km crossline) and recorded into ocean-bottom nodes simultaneously with air gun sources shooting on a conventional dense grid (50 m inline, 50 m crossline). Using the LFS data with FWI to improve the velocity model for imaging produced only incremental uplift in the subsalt image of the reservoir, albeit with image improvements at depths greater than 25,000 ft (approximately 7620 m). To better understand this, reprocessing and further analyses were conducted. We found that (1) the LFS achieved its design signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) goals over its frequency range; (2) the wave-extrapolation and imaging operators built into FWI and migration are very effective at suppressing low-frequency noise, so that densely sampled air gun data with a low S/N can still produce useable model updates with low frequencies; and (3) data density becomes less important at wider offsets. These results may have significant implications for future acquisition designs with low-frequency seismic sources going forward.

scholarly journals Deep-learning inversion: A next-generation seismic velocity model building method

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. R583-R599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangshu Yang ◽  
Jianwei Ma
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
Training Stage

Seismic velocity is one of the most important parameters used in seismic exploration. Accurate velocity models are the key prerequisites for reverse time migration and other high-resolution seismic imaging techniques. Such velocity information has traditionally been derived by tomography or full-waveform inversion (FWI), which are time consuming and computationally expensive, and they rely heavily on human interaction and quality control. We have investigated a novel method based on the supervised deep fully convolutional neural network for velocity-model building directly from raw seismograms. Unlike the conventional inversion method based on physical models, supervised deep-learning methods are based on big-data training rather than prior-knowledge assumptions. During the training stage, the network establishes a nonlinear projection from the multishot seismic data to the corresponding velocity models. During the prediction stage, the trained network can be used to estimate the velocity models from the new input seismic data. One key characteristic of the deep-learning method is that it can automatically extract multilayer useful features without the need for human-curated activities and an initial velocity setup. The data-driven method usually requires more time during the training stage, and actual predictions take less time, with only seconds needed. Therefore, the computational time of geophysical inversions, including real-time inversions, can be dramatically reduced once a good generalized network is built. By using numerical experiments on synthetic models, the promising performance of our proposed method is shown in comparison with conventional FWI even when the input data are in more realistic scenarios. We have also evaluated deep-learning methods, the training data set, the lack of low frequencies, and the advantages and disadvantages of our method.

Combined pre-stack and post-stack interpretation for velocity model building and hydrocarbon prospectivity: a learning case study from 3D seismic data offshore Gabon

First Break ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Paolo Esestime ◽  
Milos Cvetkovic ◽  
Jonathan Rogers ◽  
Howard Nicholls ◽  
Karyna Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
3D Seismic ◽  
Velocity Model Building ◽  
3D Seismic Data

Study the method of velocity model building on deeper seismic data

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Xiaowei Wang ◽  
Yan Can Tian ◽  
Gang Yuan ◽  
Hua Hui Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Model Building
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document