An audit to assess physical health monitoring of patients following their admission to the general adult psychiatric inpatient wards in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust

AimsThis audit aimed to establish whether patients undergo physical health monitoring within 24 hours of admission to one of the general adult inpatient wards in Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, as per Trust policy.BackgroundMean life expectancy in individuals with severe and enduring mental illness (SMI) is 15-20 years shorter than that of the general population. A significant proportion of excess mortality in patients with SMI is due to natural causes, e.g. cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes mellitus. Although SMI patients are at greater risk of developing chronic physical health problems, they often receive worse health care than the general population. Shared care of SMI patients between primary and secondary healthcare professionals causes uncertainty over who is responsible for monitoring the physical health of these patients.MethodA list of all inpatients on the eight general adult wards in the Trust was obtained in September 2020, producing a sample of 135 inpatients.An audit tool was designed, capturing demographic data – gender, age, ethnicity. The patient's psychiatric diagnosis was recorded. The tool captured whether each of the following were measured following admission – body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (B.P), serum cholesterol level, QRISK score and HbA1c level, and, if so, whether this was done within 24 hours of admission. For those patients who were smokers, being offered nicotine replacement therapy was documented.ResultOf the 135 inpatients, 10 didn't have any physical health monitoring completed and were excluded from the sample, making the final sample 125 inpatients. 68 of the inpatients were male, 57 were female. 98 had a diagnosis of an SMI, 27 did not. Most inpatients were of “white British” ethnicity. 91% of the sample had a BMI measured within 24 hours of admission, but only 62% had a B.P done, 59% had a serum cholesterol level done and 58% had an HbA1c level done within 24 hours of admission. 78% of eligible patients had a QRISK score calculated. 97% of inpatients who were smokers were offered nicotine replacement therapy, but only 13% accepted it.ConclusionThe majority of patients admitted to the general adult inpatient wards have an SMI. The audit findings show need for improvement in physical health monitoring following admission. Creation and implementation of a checklist of physical health parameters to be measured within 24 hours of admission could help improve performance. Use of motivational interviewing may help increase uptake of nicotine replacement therapy in smokers.

Download Full-text

Assessing the delivery of smoking cessation interventions in adult inpatients

BJPsych Open ◽

10.1192/bjo.2021.822 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (S1) ◽

pp. S311-S311

Author(s):

Katie Blissard Barnes ◽

Richard Westmoreland

Keyword(s):

Smoking Cessation ◽

Physical Health ◽

Replacement Therapy ◽

Nicotine Replacement Therapy ◽

Smoking Status ◽

Service Users ◽

Nicotine Replacement ◽

Adult Inpatient ◽

The Uk ◽

Brief Advice

AimsTo assess level of compliance with national and local guidance with regards to the recording of service users smoking status and offering of interventions.BackgroundAcross the general population, prevalence of smoking is decreasing but in those with severe mental illness, the prevalence hasn't significantly changed. LYPFT are working towards becoming a smoke-free trust. The Trust Guidance expects that Trusts should ask 100% of service users if they smoke (which should be recorded on their physical health CQUIN) and of those that do, should be offered nicotine replacement therapy and cessation advice. Public Health England is working towards all hospital trusts across the UK being Smoke-free.MethodAll service users on each of the 4 adult inpatient wards at the Becklin Centre, Leeds, were included in the audit. A total of 78 service users were included in the audit.We reviewed the digital records for every service user, specifically looking at the physical health CQUIN. We recorded if smoking status had been documented and what interventions (if any) had been recorded as given. Possible interventions included offering brief advice and offering Nicotine replacement therapy. We then reviewed medication charts to see if any nicotine replacement therapy had been prescribed.ResultThe audit found that approximately half of all service users in our audit smoked cigarettes and that the vast majority of these had their smoking status documented in their digital medical records.Three quarters of those that smoked were offered brief cessation advice and half of them were offered Nicotine Replacement Therapy. Only a third of service users that smoked had NRT prescribed on their medication chart. This represented 65% of those recorded as being offered NRT.ConclusionThere are numerous possible reasons for the above outcomes. These include a lack of knowledge and confidence in delivering smoking cessation interventions, conversations having taken place but not recorded and confusion regarding the appropriate staff member to deliver the intervention. In addition, whilst only medical professionals typically prescribe NRT, the physical health CQUIN is recorded by nurses. Therefore, this may reflect a lack of communication between staff groups.Our trust will become smoke free in the near future. To facilitate this, we hope to reduce the discrepancy between the number of service users who smoke and the number prescribed NRT.

Download Full-text

Audit of inpatient smoking cessation advice

BJPsych Open ◽

10.1192/bjo.2021.280 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (S1) ◽

pp. S92-S93

Author(s):

Flensham Mohamed ◽

Mohamed Bader

Keyword(s):

Smoking Cessation ◽

Risk Factor ◽

Physical Health ◽

Replacement Therapy ◽

Nicotine Replacement Therapy ◽

Smoking Status ◽

Health Board ◽

List Type ◽

Nicotine Replacement ◽

Smoking Cessation Advice

AimsAudit carried out to assess whether or not patients had been asked about their smoking status during admission onto an acute adult mental health ward, as well as if they had received any smoking cessation advice or offered nicotine replacement therapy.Background•Physical health outcomes in patients with serious mental illness (SMI) are consisitently worse than the general public This is due to multiple factors; adverse effects of medication (including metabolic syndromes with psychotropics) as well as poor lifestyle factors such as smoking status•Patients with an SMI are 3–6 times more likely to die due to coronary artery disease. 70% of patients in inpatient psychiatric units are smokers, a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.•Smoking cessation is a potent modifiable risk factor that can prevent mortality and reduce morbidity.MethodA cross-sectional review of all 34 inpatients across four general adult acute psychiatric wards.Patient records were explored using the Aneuran Bevan Health Board admission proformas to identify evidence of smoking status and whether advice was offered.ResultSmoker but not given cessation advice n = 13 (38%)Not asked about smoking n = 11 (32%)Smoker and given cessation advice n = 4 (12%)Non-smoker n = 6 (18%)ConclusionPatients were asked about their smoking status the majority of the time (68%) but provision of advice or nicotine replacement therapy was only done in 14% of potential smokers (identified smokers and patients not asked about smoking status).A consideration to be taken into account is that on admission, a patient's physical health status may be unknown, with the additional difficulty of a patient's acute distress complicating the physical examination, smoking status and modification of patient's smoking status may not be the highest priory in that context.Data regarding asking about smoking were different amongst wards, potentially signifying differences between assessors willingness to ask about smoking status.There is a lack of smoking cessation literature available on the wards and patients are often unaware of what options are available to quit smoking.The audit simply determined whether or not assessors were documenting smoking status, it does not measure the quantity or quality of smoking cessation advice provided.Further quality improvement projects should be launched, with focus groups as the intial step at further investigating inpatient smoking rates, as well as attempting to reduce them in a more systemic way.

Download Full-text