Learning from adversity: Occupational therapy staff experiences of coping during Covid-19

Introduction The Occupational Therapy profession is adaptable and flexible (Thorner (1991) and these characteristics have the potential to act as protective factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the mechanisms that support coping during adversity can help promote future wellbeing. The aim of this study was to explore how Occupational Therapy staff felt and coped during the first peak of the pandemic. Method A questionnaire was developed to explore the experiences of Occupational Therapy staff during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The questions explored feelings, mechanisms of support and challenges to both practice and wellbeing. A total of 75 staff responded across one NHS Health Board and reflections were analysed using inductive content analysis. Findings Staff reflected on how their ability to adapt and remain flexible were protective factors. This combined with supportive family members, friends and colleagues led respondents to reflect on how well they coped. Barriers to coping included organisational challenges, personal challenges and professional challenges. Conclusion The importance of consistent communication, the need for staff to remain connected to their profession and the importance of engaging in meaningful occupations were highlighted as key to maintaining wellbeing during adversity.

Evaluation of Learning Guidelines During the Covid-19 Pandemic

The Covid-19 epidemic has led in significant changes across the board, particularly in the realm of education. Every level of education seems to be being 'forced' to adapt in order to accommodate students studying from home via online media. Educators are expected to be innovative in their delivery of curriculum using online learning medium. The Covid-19 epidemic is a worldwide pandemic, and the National Public Health Board has declared a national emergency. A number of preventative measures have been implemented by the government in order to avoid and reduce the spread of the virus. It is hoped that we would acquire acclimated to the existing system as a learning culture in educational institutions.

Management of Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term, at Northland District Health Board.

<p>Background Prelabour rupture of membranes at term (PROM) is a subject of interest to women and maternity care providers alike. Management of PROM varies internationally, and regionally within New Zealand, despite the presence of interprofessional consensus statements. Northland District Health Board (NDHB) policy differs from most maternity care facilities by enabling expectant management of labour for women at low risk of transmission of Group β Streptococcus to their baby to extend to 96 hours from time of rupture of membranes. This study aimed to explore whether the NDHB policy was applied in practice and safely served the needs of women and babies in this DHB. Methods A retrospective quantitative clinical notes review was conducted of files in a one-year sample. The clinical notes of 123 women who had duration from ROM to birth at term of 18 hours or more were reviewed. Statistical comparisons using percentages, means and odds-ratios were made to a one-year sample of all other births at term at NDHB facilities, and with birth data from the New Zealand College of Midwives Clinical Outcomes Research Database (COMCORD). Findings Variables including demographic data, antenatal and intrapartum care given, time factors and outcomes themselves were reviewed. Few variables impacted outcomes within the PROM sample, though use of intravenous oxytocin was associated with increased epidural use and increased incidence of instrumental birth. Wāhine Māori had an increased incidence of vaginal births but some variables and outcomes highlighted inequities, including reduced antenatal screening, a higher incidence of maternal smoking, severe postpartum haemorrhage, and admission to Special Care Baby Units. Duration splits at 48 and 96 hours were applied to identify whether time increased risks for women or babies, but duration did not appear to be a factor which increased risk. The phenomenon of PROM itself increased risk for women and babies, increasing rates of labour induction, augmentation, epidural use, operative births, postpartum haemorrhage, admission to Special Care Baby Units and decreased exclusive breastfeeding at discharge. Conclusions The NDHB PROM policy appeared to be applied consistently and did not appear to increase risk for women and babies. Risks were increased for all women with PROM, with some inequitable outcomes for wahine Māori and pēpi. This research provides a comparison which is informative for clinical practice, education, and future research, and supports women’s involvement in decision-making.</p>

Management of Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term, at Northland District Health Board.

<p>Background Prelabour rupture of membranes at term (PROM) is a subject of interest to women and maternity care providers alike. Management of PROM varies internationally, and regionally within New Zealand, despite the presence of interprofessional consensus statements. Northland District Health Board (NDHB) policy differs from most maternity care facilities by enabling expectant management of labour for women at low risk of transmission of Group β Streptococcus to their baby to extend to 96 hours from time of rupture of membranes. This study aimed to explore whether the NDHB policy was applied in practice and safely served the needs of women and babies in this DHB. Methods A retrospective quantitative clinical notes review was conducted of files in a one-year sample. The clinical notes of 123 women who had duration from ROM to birth at term of 18 hours or more were reviewed. Statistical comparisons using percentages, means and odds-ratios were made to a one-year sample of all other births at term at NDHB facilities, and with birth data from the New Zealand College of Midwives Clinical Outcomes Research Database (COMCORD). Findings Variables including demographic data, antenatal and intrapartum care given, time factors and outcomes themselves were reviewed. Few variables impacted outcomes within the PROM sample, though use of intravenous oxytocin was associated with increased epidural use and increased incidence of instrumental birth. Wāhine Māori had an increased incidence of vaginal births but some variables and outcomes highlighted inequities, including reduced antenatal screening, a higher incidence of maternal smoking, severe postpartum haemorrhage, and admission to Special Care Baby Units. Duration splits at 48 and 96 hours were applied to identify whether time increased risks for women or babies, but duration did not appear to be a factor which increased risk. The phenomenon of PROM itself increased risk for women and babies, increasing rates of labour induction, augmentation, epidural use, operative births, postpartum haemorrhage, admission to Special Care Baby Units and decreased exclusive breastfeeding at discharge. Conclusions The NDHB PROM policy appeared to be applied consistently and did not appear to increase risk for women and babies. Risks were increased for all women with PROM, with some inequitable outcomes for wahine Māori and pēpi. This research provides a comparison which is informative for clinical practice, education, and future research, and supports women’s involvement in decision-making.</p>

Strategies and processes emergency department nurses consider important to safely manage during an influenza pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study

<p>The influenza virus is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide each year, with influenza pandemics occurring every 10 to 50 years and responsible for millions of deaths and substantial economic impact. Increasing globalisation through travel and trade means New Zealand is vulnerable to the risks of pandemic influenza, placing a strain on the healthcare system, putting lives at risk and posing a significant cost to the country. Emergency Departments are at the frontline of New Zealand’s healthcare system and are a crucial component in the response to an influenza pandemic, however little research has been done on the impact such an event would have on the nursing staff who work in this area and the care they provide to influenza patients. This study aims to explore what New Zealand Emergency Department nurses perceive as the biggest challenges to nursing care and staff safety during an influenza pandemic, in order to provide information on how to ensure the engagement of these nurses at the frontline of the pandemic response. With a lack of evidence-based research available, a qualitative descriptive design was used to allow an exploration of the first-hand perspectives of Emergency Department nurses, gaining meaningful insights into a phenomena which has been little explored. Sixteen nurses from two Emergency Departments participated in face-to-face interviews conducted using semi-structured questions. Raw data was transcribed, and an inductive approach was taken to data analysis, guided by the principles of both content and thematic analysis. The findings demonstrate that Emergency Department nurses work in an environment that poses risk to patient and staff safety every day, and an understanding of these safety problems is provided in the theme ‘the everyday reality for Emergency Department nurses’. Working within this context shapes the fears that Emergency Department nurses hold about what could happen if an influenza pandemic were to affect New Zealand in the future, and are summarised within the theme ‘fears for a pandemic’. The final theme, ‘strategy and planning for pandemics’ provides insight into how Emergency Department nurses feel these issues could be managed within future pandemic planning at Emergency Department, District Health Board and government level. This thesis identifies both existing and potential future safety concerns in relation to the management of influenza in New Zealand Emergency Departments, affecting the safety of patients and staff. It also provides specific multi-level and multi-agency recommendations for future pandemic plans that could help to mitigate the significant risks highlighted by those who work within the system every day.</p>

Strategies and processes emergency department nurses consider important to safely manage during an influenza pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study

<p>The influenza virus is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide each year, with influenza pandemics occurring every 10 to 50 years and responsible for millions of deaths and substantial economic impact. Increasing globalisation through travel and trade means New Zealand is vulnerable to the risks of pandemic influenza, placing a strain on the healthcare system, putting lives at risk and posing a significant cost to the country. Emergency Departments are at the frontline of New Zealand’s healthcare system and are a crucial component in the response to an influenza pandemic, however little research has been done on the impact such an event would have on the nursing staff who work in this area and the care they provide to influenza patients. This study aims to explore what New Zealand Emergency Department nurses perceive as the biggest challenges to nursing care and staff safety during an influenza pandemic, in order to provide information on how to ensure the engagement of these nurses at the frontline of the pandemic response. With a lack of evidence-based research available, a qualitative descriptive design was used to allow an exploration of the first-hand perspectives of Emergency Department nurses, gaining meaningful insights into a phenomena which has been little explored. Sixteen nurses from two Emergency Departments participated in face-to-face interviews conducted using semi-structured questions. Raw data was transcribed, and an inductive approach was taken to data analysis, guided by the principles of both content and thematic analysis. The findings demonstrate that Emergency Department nurses work in an environment that poses risk to patient and staff safety every day, and an understanding of these safety problems is provided in the theme ‘the everyday reality for Emergency Department nurses’. Working within this context shapes the fears that Emergency Department nurses hold about what could happen if an influenza pandemic were to affect New Zealand in the future, and are summarised within the theme ‘fears for a pandemic’. The final theme, ‘strategy and planning for pandemics’ provides insight into how Emergency Department nurses feel these issues could be managed within future pandemic planning at Emergency Department, District Health Board and government level. This thesis identifies both existing and potential future safety concerns in relation to the management of influenza in New Zealand Emergency Departments, affecting the safety of patients and staff. It also provides specific multi-level and multi-agency recommendations for future pandemic plans that could help to mitigate the significant risks highlighted by those who work within the system every day.</p>

Promoting positive interactions between midwives and obstetricians at the primary/secondary interface

Background: Interprofessional communication is a critical component of safe maternity care. The literature reports circumstances in Aotearoa New Zealand and overseas when interprofessional collaboration works well between midwives and obstetricians, as well as descriptions of unsatisfactory communication between the two professions. Aim: To explore and define effective collaboration between midwives and obstetricians at the primary/secondary interface in maternity care, in order to generate suggestions to foster positive collaboration. Method: Eight primary care midwives, three obstetricians and two obstetric registrars from a single District Health Board in Aotearoa New Zealand were interviewed about their interactions at the primary/secondary interface and their understanding, and use, of the Referral Guidelines. The theoretical perspective was Appreciative Inquiry. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: Results indicate usually positive interprofessional interactions. Dominant emergent themes are the need to negotiate differing philosophies, to clarify blurred boundaries that sometimes lead to lack of clear lines of responsibility, and the importance of three-way conversations. Of the three themes, this article focuses on three-way communication between midwife, obstetrician/registrar and woman. Participants reported that, when effective three-way communication between woman, midwife and obstetrician occurred, philosophical difference could be negotiated, blurred boundaries clarified and understanding of the respective roles of the LMC midwife and the obstetric team promoted. Participants value the Referral Guidelines but report some limitations to their applicability. Conclusion: Effective three-way communication promotes good maternity care. This study has identified ways to support optimal communication.

PP215 An Evaluation Of The Scottish Medicine Consortium Detailed Advice Document

IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) conducts early health technology assessment (HTA) of new medicines. The advice is implemented at the local level by 14 Health Board Area Drug and Therapeutics Committees (ADTCs). The primary output is a published document, the Detailed Advice Document (DAD), which aims to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence considered and the rationale for the decision. We examined how the DAD is being used to determine areas for improvement.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of SMC and ADTC members and formulary pharmacists, who are one of the key audiences. Interviews were recorded and transcribed using Microsoft Teams and coded in NVivo. The results were assessed via thematic analysis, which included major themes such as the structure and content of the DAD and its usefulness in supporting implementation of the advice from an ADTC perspective.ResultsFollowing initial interviews (n = 7), some early themes have emerged. The DAD is a valued tool describing the assessment of a medicine's clinical and cost effectiveness. The current length of the DADs and the technical language used can limit the accessibility of information, and there have been suggestions on how to improve the structure and content. Additional interviews are still being completed and full interview results (available early 2021) will be analyzed to identify key themes.ConclusionsThe DAD is the primary output of SMC's HTA process, which includes decisions on whether a medicine can be routinely prescribed in the National Health Service Scotland. DADs have increased in length over the years, reflecting the increasing complexity of new medicines and a corresponding increase in the size of pharmaceutical company submissions. The interviews conducted to date suggest that the DADs are highly regarded and support implementation of new medicines advice by the ADTC. The findings of this evaluation will lead to an action plan for improvement.