scholarly journals Proportionality of legal discrimination

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Partha Gangopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Legal Duty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Health Legislation

Sir: The article by Zigmond (2009) made for interesting reading. Mental health law is about balancing the need to detain people in order to protect them or other people from harm and the need to respect people's human rights and autonomy. In the UK, there was much concern during the development of recent mental health legislation, in particular the Mental Capacity Act 2005, that the government had got this balance wrong. Many of these concerns have been addressed in the updated Code of Practice to the 1983 Mental Health Act, which is an essential guide to practising under the Act (Department of Health, 2008). There is no legal duty to comply with the Code, but professionals must have regard to it and record the reason for any departure from the guidance (which can be subject to legal challenge).

Mental Health Legislation

2019 ◽  
pp. 11-22
Author(s):  
Julie Chalmers
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Mental Health Act ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Human Rights Act ◽  
Human Rights Act 1998 ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
Health Legislation

This chapter gives an overview of the mental health legislation of England and Wales as it applies to inpatient psychiatric wards, discusses some key concepts such as capacity and deprivation of liberty, and highlights the principles underpinning the Human Rights Act 1998, the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and the Mental Health Act 1983. The use of legislation at the point of admission and in the provision of treatment particularly in the absence of consent will be considered. The safeguards protecting the patient detained under the Mental Health Act will be highlighted and the use of community treatment orders on leaving hospital will be briefly touched upon. Finally, governance of the use of the Mental Health Act and some future challenges to the basis of legislation will be discussed.

scholarly journals Code of Practice 1999: navigating before reform of the Mental Health Act 1983

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Julian C. Hughes ◽  
Tony Lawson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Public Safety ◽  
Green Paper ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Mental Health Act ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Health Legislation

Mental health legislation must steer a course between Scylla and Charybdis. Scylla represents the notion of individual liberties; Charybdis represents the notion of safety and, in particular, public safety. At the time of writing a Green Paper is expected in 1999, so reform of the Mental Health Act 1983 is on its way. Meanwhile, does the new Code of Practice (Department of Health & Welsh Office, 1999), in force since 1 April 1999, give us any indication as to the course we might be steering?

scholarly journals Least restrictive alternative – advance statements and the new mental health legislation

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 246-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Atkinson ◽  
H. C. Garner
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Home Office ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Advance Statements ◽  
Restrictive Environment ◽  
The Patient’S View ◽  
Health Legislation ◽  
Least Restrictive Alternative

Proposals for new mental health legislation make the case for using the ‘least restrictive alternative’ (Scottish Executive, 2001) and the ‘least restrictive environment’ (Department of Health & Home Office, 2000) as guiding principles in deciding the management and treatment of the patient. This appears to be the case made for introducing compulsory treatment in the community. The patient living in the community, while maintained on medication, rather than the hospital would appear to be defined as on the ‘least restrictive alternative’. This, however, takes only a limited approach to what is ‘restrictive’, which should be interpreted more widely, including the patient's view as well as that of clinicians and policy makers. Thus, a patient may see it as less restrictive during an acute phase to be in hospital and not on medication, than in the community but on medication. It is likely, given our knowledge of patients' attitudes to medication (Eastwood & Pugh, 1997), that many patients will prefer to be on oral medication rather than depot, which they see as less restrictive.

8. Mental health

2021 ◽  
pp. 134-155
Author(s):  
Jo Samanta ◽  
Ash Samanta
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Disorders ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Legal Reforms ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Health Disorders ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
Discharge From Hospital

This chapter focuses on statutory provisions governing mental health and mental health disorders, with particular reference to the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. It first outlines modern approaches to mental disorders, including legal reforms and the MHA 1983 Code of Practice (2015). It considers the main routes by which patients are admitted to the mental health system (voluntary or involuntary), deprivation of liberty, including Cheshire West and the proposed liberty protection safeguards, and the issue of consent with regards to medical treatment. Finally, the chapter discusses community care that must be provided to people with mental health disorders following discharge from hospital, particularly aftercare and supervised community treatment orders. Relevant cases are considered.

scholarly journals Mental health legislation in Egypt

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 64-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser Loza ◽  
Mohamed El Nawawi
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Psychiatric Services ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Mental Health Act ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
History Of ◽  
Health Legislation

This paper first briefly reviews the history of psychiatric services in Egypt. It then details the legislation in place during the last years of the Mubarak regime and goes on to set out recent developments, in particular the Code of Practice introduced for the Mental Health Act of 2009.

Advocacy, Ethics, and Values in Mental Health

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakki Cowley
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Information Support ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Professional Obligations ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
History Of ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
The Uk

This chapter discusses mental health advocacy in the UK and how the history of mental health care has influenced current practice, as well as how the advocacy sector in general has shaped government policy and legislation. The emphasis is on England and Wales, although advocacy delivery in Scotland and Northern Ireland is also considered. The chapter first defines advocacy and outlines its history in the UK before analyzing recent developments in the country. It then examines the principles of advocacy (independence; empowerment; representation, information, support; accountability; confidentiality), together with different forms of advocacy in the UK and key legislation, including the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales. Finally, it looks at issues and challenges faced by mental health advocates with regard to ethics and values, such as conflicts of interest and duty, the nature of professional obligations and neutrality, and social justice.

scholarly journals The Mental Capacity Act and mental healthcare in prison: opportunities and challenges

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 241-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Davies ◽  
Claire Dimond
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
People With Mental Illness ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
The Uk

SummaryThe UK Mental Health Act 1983 does not apply in prison. The legal framework for the care and treatment of people with mental illness in prison is provided by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. We raise dilemmas about its use. We highlight how assessing best interests and defining harm involves making challenging judgements. How best interests and harm are interpreted has a potentially significant impact on clinical practice within a prison context.

scholarly journals A new legislative framework for mental capacity and mental health legislation in Northern Ireland: an analysis of the current proposals

2014 ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Maura McCallion ◽  
Ursula O'Hare
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Health Legislation

<p>When the Bamford Review of Mental Health and Learning Disability completed its work in the autumn of 2007, it drew to a close an extensive consultation and analysis of mental health and learning disability services and the law in Northern Ireland. Its last report on A Comprehensive Legislative Framework made<br />a compelling case for a major overhaul of the law that the Review team itself described as ‘quite radical’. The Review identified the case for reform in the need to ensure that mental health law conforms to the requirements of human rights law, reflects changes to professional practice, reflects the needs of service<br />users and their carers, and keeps pace with reform elsewhere in the UK. Alone of all the jurisdictions in the UK, Northern Ireland has been operating largely in a legislative vacuum in relation to mental capacity law. The Review’s proposals for reform therefore extended to reform of mental health law and the introduction of mental capacity law.</p><p>In the autumn of 2008 the NI Executive published its response to the Bamford Review indicating that it intended to develop the law sequentially: reform of the Mental Health (NI) Order 1986 by 2011 followed by the introduction of mental capacity law in 2014. Responses to the Executive’s consultation resulted in<br />the Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS) revising its approach and it signalled its intention to bring forward mental capacity and mental health legislation together. This reated a unique opportunity in Northern Ireland for fusion of incapacity and mental health legislation. A further consultation paper was issued in January 2009, setting out the key approaches to the content<br />of two bills. However as a result of the consultation, the Health Minister Michael McGimpsey announced in September 2009 that there would be a single bill with an overall principle of autonomy. His press statement noted: “ A strong body of opinion, particularly from professional groups and lead voluntary organisations, which considered that separate mental health legislation continues to be stigmatising and recommended that mental capacity and mental health provisions should instead be encompassed into a single piece of legislation”</p><p>This short paper provides an overview of the current direction of travel on law reform in Northern Ireland. It comments on the policy climate and arguments for a fusion of mental capacity and mental health legislation. It also highlights some of the key policy issues that will need to be further explored as the Department develops its law reform proposals and concludes with some hopes and fears for the new legislation.</p>

scholarly journals Different laws, same principles: mental health and incapacity legislation across the UK

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-160
Author(s):  
Donald Lyons
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Ethical Practice ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Critical Issues ◽  
Care And Treatment ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Health Legislation

SummaryEngland and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are all at different stages in developing their mental health legislation. All jurisdictions have encountered problems in interpretation and operation of the various acts. As an introduction to a series of articles to appear in Advances on mental health and incapacity law, this editorial offers a commentary on some of the critical issues and suggests some key principles that everyone should follow in order to provide care and treatment that accords with best legal and ethical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document