Are Electrocardiogram Abnormalities More Difficult to Identify Than Define?: A Study of Medical Students and Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine Residents

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (5Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S190-S190
Author(s):  
D. A. Wald
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S297-S297
Author(s):  
Dylan J Jester ◽  
Kathryn Hyer ◽  
Ross Andel

Abstract Our study evaluated and contrasted responses to 25 content areas essential to the primary care of older adults by medical students and residents, and identified attitudes toward aging amongst students and residents. One hundred and thirty-six medical students and 61 Internal Medicine residents completed a survey including the 25-item Geriatrics Clinician-Educator Survey and 18-item Images of Aging Scale. Students and residents rated importance and knowledge for content areas from 1 (low) to 10 (high). Gap scores reflecting the difference in ratings between importance and knowledge were calculated. The Images of Aging scale ranges between 0 (furthest from what you think) and 6 (closest to what you think). Results indicated that students and residents reflected similar beliefs about the importance of content areas, but students provided lower ratings in knowledge. Students revealed larger gap scores in areas that reflected general primary care (e.g., assess chronic conditions, medications), whereas residents revealed larger gap scores in areas that reflected specialists’ expertise (e.g., driving risk, cognition, psychiatric symptoms). Attitudes toward older adults did not differ appreciably between students and residents. In sum, primary care topics applicable for any age demographic were rated as most important by first-year medical students and Internal Medicine residents. Topics relevant to older populations – particularly those requiring specialists’ knowledge of or requiring sensitive discussion with older adults – were rated as less important and were less well mastered.


2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (7) ◽  
pp. 698-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Nagoshi ◽  
Shellie Williams ◽  
Richard Kasuya ◽  
Damon Sakai ◽  
Kamal Masaki ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 120 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murtaza Cassoobhoy ◽  
Scott F. Wetterhall ◽  
Darren F. Collins ◽  
Paul T. Cantey ◽  
Christopher J. Iverson ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsumasa Kishimoto ◽  
Michael Nagoshi ◽  
Shellie Williams ◽  
Kamal H. Masaki ◽  
Patricia Lanoie Blanchette

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenya Ie ◽  
Akiko Murata ◽  
Masao Tahara ◽  
Manabu Komiyama ◽  
Shuhei Ichikawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Backgrounds The shortage of physicians in several specialties has been brought to public attention in several countries. However, little is known about factors affecting medical students’ specialty choice. The objectives of our study were to illustrate medical students’ career priority clusters and to assess their association with specialty preference. Methods We conducted a nationwide multicenter survey in 2015 at 17 medical schools. The study participants were asked their top three specialty preferences, demographic characteristics, and 14 career priority questions. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of each variables on student career choice. Results A total of 1,264 responses were included in the analyses. The top five specialty choice were internal medicine: 833, general practice: 408, paediatrics: 372, surgery: 344, and emergency medicine: 244. An exploratory factor analysis mapped the 14 career priorities into 3-factor solution; “primary care orientation”, “advanced and specific care”, and “personal life orientation”. Multilevel logistic regression models yielded satisfactory accuracy with the highest ROC curve (AUROC) noted in surgery (0.818), general practice (0.769), and emergency medicine (0.744). The career priorities under “primary care orientation” had positive association with choosing general practice, emergency medicine, internal medicine, and paediatrics. The “advanced and specific care” career priorities facilitated surgery and emergency medicine choice, while reducing the likelihood of choosing less procedure-oriented specialties, such as internal medicine, general practice, and paediatrics. Conclusions Our results demonstrated medical students’ career priorities and their association with specialty preference. Individualized career support may be beneficial for both medical students and each specialty fields.


2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (12) ◽  
pp. 1135-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Martínez ◽  
Eduardo Guarda ◽  
Ricardo Baeza ◽  
Bernardita Garayar ◽  
Gastón Chamorro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document