scholarly journals BELIEFS REGARDING GERIATRICS PRIMARY CARE TOPICS AMONG MEDICAL STUDENTS AND INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S297-S297
Author(s):  
Dylan J Jester ◽  
Kathryn Hyer ◽  
Ross Andel

Abstract Our study evaluated and contrasted responses to 25 content areas essential to the primary care of older adults by medical students and residents, and identified attitudes toward aging amongst students and residents. One hundred and thirty-six medical students and 61 Internal Medicine residents completed a survey including the 25-item Geriatrics Clinician-Educator Survey and 18-item Images of Aging Scale. Students and residents rated importance and knowledge for content areas from 1 (low) to 10 (high). Gap scores reflecting the difference in ratings between importance and knowledge were calculated. The Images of Aging scale ranges between 0 (furthest from what you think) and 6 (closest to what you think). Results indicated that students and residents reflected similar beliefs about the importance of content areas, but students provided lower ratings in knowledge. Students revealed larger gap scores in areas that reflected general primary care (e.g., assess chronic conditions, medications), whereas residents revealed larger gap scores in areas that reflected specialists’ expertise (e.g., driving risk, cognition, psychiatric symptoms). Attitudes toward older adults did not differ appreciably between students and residents. In sum, primary care topics applicable for any age demographic were rated as most important by first-year medical students and Internal Medicine residents. Topics relevant to older populations – particularly those requiring specialists’ knowledge of or requiring sensitive discussion with older adults – were rated as less important and were less well mastered.

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Kalender-Rich ◽  
Jonathan D. Mahnken ◽  
Lei Dong ◽  
Anthony M. Paolo ◽  
Deon Cox Hayley ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The number of older adults needing primary care exceeds the capacity of trained geriatricians to accommodate them. All physicians should have basic knowledge of optimal outpatient care of older adults to enhance the capacity of the system to serve this patient group. To date, there is no knowledge-assessment tool that focuses specifically on geriatric ambulatory care. Objective We developed an examination to assess internal medicine residents' knowledge of ambulatory geriatrics. Methods A consensus panel developed a 30-question examination based on topics in the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Certification Examination Blueprint, the ABIM in-training examinations, and the American Geriatrics Society Goals and Objectives. Questions were reviewed, edited, and then administered to medical students, internal medicine residents, primary care providers, and geriatricians. Results Ninety-eight individuals (20 fourth-year medical students, 57 internal medicine residents, 11 primary care faculty members, and 10 geriatrics fellowship-trained physicians) took the examination. Based on psychometric analysis of the results, 5 questions were deleted because of poor discriminatory power. The Cronbach α coefficient of the remaining 25 questions was 0.48; however, assessment of interitem consistency may not be an appropriate measure, given the variety of clinical topics on which questions were based. Scores increased with higher levels of training in geriatrics (P < .001). Conclusion Our preliminary study suggests that the examination we developed is a reasonably valid method to assess knowledge of ambulatory geriatric care and may be useful in assessing residents.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-213
Author(s):  
Jasmin Hundal ◽  
Matthew J Hadfield ◽  
Alifaiz Saiyed ◽  
William Rabitaille

213 Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most commonly spread sexually transmitted infection and is implicated in the oncogenesis of several cancers, including cervical, anal,vaginal and oropharyngeal cancers. HPV vaccinations have a high efficacy, and recent data demonstrated adults aged 18-26 years old are not adequately fully vaccinated. Our objective was to assess the current practice regarding HPV vaccination among persons 9-45 years of age, knowledge about the HPV guidelines, and recommendation practice. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of Internal Medicine residents acting as primary care physicians at an urban clinic based in Hartford, Connecticut, USA. The survey was administered to internal medicine residents and attending physicians to assess the current practice regarding the HPV vaccination for adults and knowledge of the updated guidelines. The key drivers identified were resident knowledge, communication, insurance coverage, and availability of HPV vaccination in the clinic. An educational handout and lecture was provided with a follow-up survey. Results: A total of 347 charts were reviewed. Of those eligible to receive the HPV vaccine, it was found that only 5.2% received the total dosage. The response rate to our initial survey was 60%. 47.83% did not inquire about the HPV vaccination or recommended it to patients compared to 71.43% of attending physicians (AP) who inquired, but only 28.47% discussed it during precepting sessions. 27.7% of the residents and 71.43% AP correctly identified the updated guidelines. The biggest three barriers were unfamiliarity with the availability of HPV vaccination, insurance coverage, and current guidelines. A short educational review and summary were provided to close the gaps identified with the questionnaire.100% of residents correctly identified the updated guidelines, risks, benefits, importance of shared decision-making, and more likely recommend the HPV vaccination. However, 69.2% were unaware that HPV vaccination does not prevent the progression of HPV-related cancers. Conclusions: Adherence to CDC guidelines regarding vaccinating against HPV amongst resident physicians is poor. The percentage of patients, who received the complete Gardasil-9 vaccination series, was significantly below the national average. Our study highlights a large practice gap that exists amongst resident physicians regarding the HPV vaccine. There was minimal documentation amongst resident physicians regarding shared decision-making conversations with patients. We addressed the knowledge and resource deficit with an educational handout and information session. Our intervention demonstrated improved confidence in discussing the vaccine with the patients and resolved the concern of insurance coverage and availability of vaccines in the clinic and pharmacy.


2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (7) ◽  
pp. 698-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Nagoshi ◽  
Shellie Williams ◽  
Richard Kasuya ◽  
Damon Sakai ◽  
Kamal Masaki ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 120 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murtaza Cassoobhoy ◽  
Scott F. Wetterhall ◽  
Darren F. Collins ◽  
Paul T. Cantey ◽  
Christopher J. Iverson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document