Paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study.

PURPOSE To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and better tolerated sequence of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion plus bolus doxorubicin (DOX) and to evaluate antitumor efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five women with metastatic breast cancer (dominant visceral metastases in 56%, and involvement of > or = three sites in 67%) who never received chemotherapy of any type were studied. Paclitaxel every 3 weeks (125 mg/m2 starting dose) was increased by 25-mg/m2 steps in subsequent cohorts of patients. DOX (60 mg/m2 fixed dose) was administered 15 minutes before the start of or after the end of paclitaxel for a maximum of eight cycles. Subsequently, patients in continuous response could receive single-agent paclitaxel (175 to 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). The drug sequence was alternated in consecutive patients and in the first two cycles. RESULTS Severe neutropenia that lasted greater than 7 days (n = 4), febrile neutropenia (n = 7) and grade III oral mucositis (n = 6) defined the MTD of paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 in 34 assessable patients. Grade II peripheral neuropathy occurred in 33% of patients. Six women (18%) developed clinically reversible congestive heart failure (CHF) after a median of 480 mg/m2 total DOX. Drug sequence had no effect on toxicities. High efficacy on all metastatic sites in 32 assessable patients accounted for a 41% complete response (CR) rate (95% confidence interval [CI], 24% to 59%) and 94% overall-response rate (95% CI, 79% to 99%). After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 3 to 18), the median response duration is 8 months (range, 2+ to 18+) for complete responders and 11 months (range 1+ to 15+) for partial responders. CONCLUSION The rate of CR and incidence of CHF may be an expression of therapeutic and toxic enhancement due to the schedule used in this trial. Until clarification of this possibility, this promising combination should be used in investigational trials.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II trial of biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1996.14.4.1185 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 14 (4) ◽

pp. 1185-1191 ◽

Cited By ~ 40

Author(s):

K A Gelmon ◽

S E O'Reilly ◽

A W Tolcher ◽

C Campbell ◽

C Bryce ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Phase I ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

Previous Exposure ◽

Median Response ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Initial Starting

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) administered biweekly with a fixed dose of cisplatin, to assess the toxicity, and to evaluate the activity of this combination in a phase I/II trial in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled; 27 were assessable for response and 29 for toxicity. All but two of the women had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy, with 23 receiving anthracyclines and six previous cisplatin. RESULTS The initial starting dose of paclitxel 90 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 became the phase II dose due to dose-limiting neutropenia. Responses were seen in 85% of assessable patients, with three patients (11%) achieving a complete response (CR) and 20 patients (14%) a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66% to 96%). The time to disease progression for patients who achieved a CR was 110 to 200 days, and for those with a PR, it was 96 to 377+ days, with a median time to progression of 7.1 months and a median response duration of 7.9 months. Sites of CR were skin, soft tissue, and lung, and all occurred in women with previous exposure to anthracyclines. Septic events were rare, with two grade 3 infections (7%), only one of which required hospital admission. There were no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity and minimal grade 3 toxicity. A total of 251 chemotherapy cycles were given -- 16 with paclitaxel alone in five patients. Forty-five percent of patients required dose reductions, while 52% had delays due to neutropenia. CONCLUSION Biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin is an active combination in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, including for patients with previous exposure to anthracyclines.

Download Full-text

Phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly everolimus (RAD001) in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.1066 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 1066-1066

Author(s):

S. L. Moulder ◽

E. Rivera ◽

J. Ensor ◽

A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽

M. Christofanilli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Single Agent ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Entire Group ◽

Interpatient Variability ◽

Grade 3

1066 Background: Inhibition of mTOR with everolimus (E) may improve efficacy in combination with docetaxel (D), but both drugs are metabolized by CYP3A4, thus a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction may also exist. Methods: 15 patients (pts) with MBC were treated with docetaxel and everolimus using the continuous reassessment method (CRM) to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Docetaxel doses were 40–75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Everolimus doses were 20–50 mg PO on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (except cycle 2, where only day 8 was given to allow single agent PK analyses of both drugs). Response was measured every 2 cycles using RECIST. Results: Median age= 58 years and 77% of pts had >2 prior chemotherapies for MBC. Initially 2 of 2 pts treated (D= 75 mg/m2, E= 30 mg) developed DLT (neutropenic fever/infection), prompting a mandatory PK evaluation for all pts enrolled in subsequent cohorts. A second cohort of 3 patients (D=60 mg/m2, E=20mg) had no DLT, but no pts received day 8 of E due to grade 3–4 neutropenia. PK analyses demonstrated a 42% lowered (-42%) D clearance at the 60 mg/m2 in the presence of E (n=1). Subsequent cohorts were accrued at D=40 mg/m2 with escalating doses of E (Table). For the entire group, an 18% decrease (-18%) in D clearance was observed when D was administered concomitantly with E. High interpatient variability of D clearance was observed (range +16% to -135%). No pts had CR/PR, but 6 had SD>4 cycles and 2 had SD=8 cycles. Conclusions: Weekly everolimus appears to cause widely variable and unpredictable changes in docetaxel clearance making this combination unfeasible. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1989.7.5.560 ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 7 (5) ◽

pp. 560-571 ◽

Cited By ~ 174

Author(s):

I C Henderson ◽

J C Allegra ◽

T Woodcock ◽

S Wolff ◽

S Bryan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Response Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Severe Nausea ◽

Median Response ◽

Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽

Doxorubicin Group ◽

To Receive

Three hundred twenty-five women with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast who had failed one prior chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced disease were randomized to receive 14 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone or 75 mg/m2 of doxorubicin intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Enrollment was closed on October 31, 1984, after 165 patients were randomized to mitoxantrone and 160 patients to doxorubicin. Patients randomized to the two treatment groups were compared for response rate, duration of response, time to progression or death, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. The response rate to mitoxantrone was 20.6%, to doxorubicin 29.3% (P = .07). The median response duration was 151 days for the mitoxantrone group and 126 days for the doxorubicin group (P = .16). The median TTF was 70 days in the mitoxantrone group and 104 days in the doxorubicin group (P = .36). The median survival of patients initially randomized to receive mitoxantrone was 273 days; for doxorubicin 268 days (P = .40). There were three responses among 77 patients crossed over to mitoxantrone after initial treatment with doxorubicin. The major dose-limiting toxicity for both drugs was leukopenia. There was significantly less severe and less frequent toxicity with mitoxantrone administration. Severe nausea and vomiting occurred in 9.5% of mitoxantrone patients and 25.3% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). The incidence of severe stomatitis and mucositis was 0.6% in the mitoxantrone group and 8.4% in the doxorubicin group (P = .001). Severe alopecia occurred in 5.1% of mitoxantrone patients and 61.0% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). A life-table comparison of the cumulative dose to the development of a cardiac event showed that mitoxantrone had significantly less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin (P = .0005). This study demonstrates that mitoxantrone is active as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Compared with doxorubicin it appears to be marginally less active and significantly less toxic. We conclude that mitoxantrone can be used alone or with other standard drugs to palliate the symptoms of metastatic breast cancer, especially in settings where drug toxicity is an important consideration.

Download Full-text

Phase II study of irinotecan plus capecitabine in patients with anthracycline and taxane pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.1093 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 1093-1093

Author(s):

K. S. Lee ◽

J. Ro ◽

I. H. Park ◽

E. A. Kim ◽

B. Nam

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Single Agent ◽

Objective Response ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Cross Resistance ◽

Median Response

1093 Background: Irinotecan (I) and capecitabine (X) have demonstrated single agent activity against breast cancer by different antitumor mechanism without cross-resistance. To assess the objective response rate (RR) of IX combination in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) was the primary end point. Methods: Anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated pts with measurable disease, age ≥ 18 years, adequate organ functions, and ECOG performance score (PS) 0–2 were eligible. Sample size of 36 was calculated with Simon's two stage minimax design. Pts received I 80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 and X 1,000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1–14 of every 21-day cycle. Results: Between September 2006 and April 2008, 36 pts with median age of 50 years (range, 28–71) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 8.3+ - 27.7+). Among 35 evaluable pts excluding 1-consent withdrawal, 86% received at least one prior chemotherapy for MBC; 20% had stage IV disease with 66% lung/37% liver metastases; 80% had PS 0–1; 77% had hormone receptor (HR) positive tumors, 20% triple negative disease and 3% HER-2 positive tumors. Overall RR was 60% (95% CI, 43.5–74.5) with median response duration of 6.3 months (range, 1.0+-17.1+); 2 CR (6%), 19 PR (54%), 8 SD (23%), and 6 PD (17%) with similar RR between HR+ (63%) versus triple negative disease (57%). Median survival was not reached with 76% estimated survival at 1-year, and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months (range, 0.7–21.1+). Pts received a median of 8 cycles of treatment (range, 1–26+). G1, G2, and G3 hand-foot syndrome were observed in 34%, 17%, and 0%, respectively. NCI grade ≥ 3 adverse events were: neutropenia (60%); asthenia, diarrhea, and vomiting (9%, each); transaminase elevation and febrile neutropenia (6%, each); abdominal pain, anorexia, fatigue, myalgia, and nausea (3%, each). Conclusions: I and X combination by this schedule and doses is highly efficacious in anthracyline- and taxane-pretreated MBC pts with manageable toxicities. Further investigation of this combination in phase III trials is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Paclitaxel with mitoxantrone, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1996.14.5.1611 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 14 (5) ◽

pp. 1611-1616 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

J D Hainsworth ◽

S E Jones ◽

R G Mennel ◽

J L Blum ◽

F A Greco

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Single Agent ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

High Dose ◽

Combination Regimen ◽

Second Line ◽

Median Response ◽

Combination Regimens

PURPOSE Paclitaxel is a highly active single agent in the treatment of breast cancer. However, its optimal incorporation into combination regimens awaits definition. In this phase II study, we added paclitaxel, administered by 1-hour infusion, to a previously described combination regimen that included mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (5-FU), and high-dose leucovorin (NFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer received the following regimen as first- or second-line treatment: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus on day 1, 5-FU 350 mg2/m by i.v. bolus on days 1, 2, and 3, and leucovorin 300 mg i.v. over 30 to 60 minutes immediately preceding 5-FU on days 1, 2, and 3. Courses were administered at 3-week intervals for a total of eight courses in responding patients. RESULTS Twenty-three of 45 assessable patients (51%) had major responses. Previous chemotherapy, and in particular previous treatment with doxorubicin, did not affect response rate. The median response duration was 7.5 months. Myelosuppression was moderately severe, with 76% of courses resulting in grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Hospitalization for treatment of fever during neutropenia was required in 13% of courses, and two patients died as a result of sepsis. Two patients developed severe congestive heart failure after a large cumulative anthracycline dose. CONCLUSION This combination regimen was active as first- or second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer, although its activity compared with other combination regimens or with paclitaxel alone is unclear. Myelosuppression was more severe than anticipated based on previous results with the NFL regimen or with paclitaxel administered at this dose and schedule as a single agent. The infrequent development of cardiotoxicity in these patients suggests that the paclitaxel/mitoxantrone combination may not share the problems previously reported with the paclitaxel/doxorubicin combination.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Stealth Liposomal Doxorubicin in Combination With Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1716 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 19 (6) ◽

pp. 1716-1722 ◽

Cited By ~ 47

Author(s):

Edgardo Rivera ◽

Vicente Valero ◽

Laura Syrewicz ◽

Zia Rahman ◽

Francisco L. Esteva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Antitumor Activity ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Neutropenic Fever ◽

Fixed Dose

PURPOSE: We conducted a single-institution phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and define the toxic effects of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had disease progression with no limit on prior number of chemotherapy regimens. Prior treatment with liposomal doxorubicin and/or gemcitabine was not allowed. The starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin was 20 mg/m2 on day 1 only with a 20% dose escalation of the previous mg/m2 dose until MTD was reached. Gemcitabine was given as a fixed dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: We treated 27 patients of whom six had never received chemotherapy for their disease. Most had had visceral involvement as their dominant site of disease. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. However, neither neutropenic fever nor episodes of bleeding were major occurrences. Significant antitumor activity was also observed with a total of two complete and seven partial responses. The recommended phase II dose is liposomal doxorubicin 24 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. CONCLUSION: The combination of liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine is an active and well tolerated regimen when administered on a 21-day schedule. Myelosuppression limited further dose escalation, however, it did not increase the incidence of neutropenic fever. Significant antitumor activity seen in heavily and minimally pretreated patients warrants further evaluation of this combination.

Download Full-text