PEGylated Liposomes Remotely Loaded with the Combination of Doxorubicin, Quinine, and Indocyanine Green Enable Successful Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tumors

Multidrug resistance (MDR) of cancer cells remains a major obstacle to favorable outcomes of treatment with many drugs, including doxorubicin. Most of the clinical trials failed to demonstrate the benefit of the drug efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors to circumvent P-gp-mediated drug resistance in vivo. The present study explored the therapeutic potential of combined treatment with liposomal doxorubicin, P-gp inhibitor quinine, and the photodynamic therapy (PDT) using indocyanine green (ICG) in the adenocarcinoma drug-resistant tumor model. Liposomes were actively co-remotely loaded with doxorubicin and quinine, and ICG was passively adsorbed. The liposomes were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and cryogenic transmission microscopy (Cryo-TEM). We found that quinine impaired the crystalline structure of doxorubicin. In vitro, treatment with single agents themselves was insufficient to inhibit the growth of HT-29 MDR1 cells. However, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and quinine (PLDQ) significantly diminished HT-29 MDR1 cell survival. Furthermore, survival inhibition intensified by the addition of ICG to the PLDQ (ICG + PLDQ). In vivo, ICG + PLDQ significantly decreased tumor growth when combined with tumor irradiation with NIR light (** p < 0.01). ICG + PLDQ + irradiation was superior to single treatments or combinational treatments without irradiation. These findings suggest that ICG + PLDQ can overcome P-gp-mediated MDR in cancer cells.

Case Report: Postoperative Recurrence of Adrenal Epithelioid Angiosarcoma Achieved Complete Response by Combination Chemotherapy With Liposomal Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel

BackgroundPrimary adrenal epithelioid angiosarcoma is an extremely rare cancer with a poor prognosis. Because of the rarity of this disease, treatment options have not been well-studied.Case presentationA 51-year-old man was admitted to Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, diagnosed with a recurrence of adrenal epithelioid angiosarcoma. He had undergone a surgical resection seven months earlier. Combination chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel was administered. After two cycles of chemotherapy, his pain was relieved. Computed tomography (CT) suggested that the soft tissue tumour lesions in the surgical area had disappeared, mediastinal and mediastinal-hilar lymph nodes were significantly reduced or had disappeared, and the patient had achieved a partial response (PR). CT after six cycles of chemotherapy indicated that the patient had achieved a complete response (CR).ConclusionCombination chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel may be a preferred therapy for recurrent or advanced adrenal epithelioid angiosarcoma.

The effectiveness of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride in combination with cyclophosphan in the treatment of breast cancer in an experiment

Purpose of the study. To evaluate the antitumor efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride in combination with tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer.Materials and methods. The study included mongrel white rats (n = 30). A model of carcinogenesis (Walker 256 tumors) was created for all animals. Then we divided these rats into 3 equal groups: 1 control group (n = 10) - animals were monitored without treatment; 2 group (n = 10) - animals received neoadjuvant therapy: liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride + cyclophosphan; 3 group (n = 10) - animals received neoadjuvant therapy with doxorubicin hydrochloride (non-liposomal) and cyclophosphan. Animals of the second and third groups received two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. All animals were monitored for 1.5 months. We evaluated the effectiveness of antitumor therapy by measuring the size of tumors, the dynamics of their regression, and counting the number of metastases in the lungs. The toxic effects of doxorubicin hydrochloride were assessed by blood parameters: platelet and lymphocyte levels.Results. We recorded a significant inhibition of the growth of tumor nodes in the second group of rats on the 25th day from the start of the experiment compared with the first and third groups: 36004.7, 86112.1 and 38962.4 mm3, respectively. By the end of the 3rd week of the experiment, we also noted the formation of a tumor regression trend in the 2nd and 3rd groups of animals, which was reliably maintained until the end of the observation. At the end of the experiment, the number of metastases in the first group of animals was 3 times more, in the third group almost 1.5 times more than in the second (p < 0.05)Conclusion. The treatment of Walker 256 tumor with liposomal doxorubicin showed better efficacy and safety in comparison with non-liposomal doxorubicin. The tumor volume becomes smaller against the background of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride compared with its non-liposomal form, while there is no pronounced decrease in platelets and lymphocytes. We also recorded a significantly lower number of lung metastases in animals of the second group compared to other groups.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx®) as Adjuvant Treatment in Early-Stage Luminal B-like Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Phase II Trial

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for Luminal B-like breast cancers usually includes anthracycline-based regimens. However, some patients are reluctant to receive chemotherapy because of side-effects, especially alopecia, and ask for a “less intensive” or personalized approach. Patients and methods: We conducted a phase II feasibility trial to evaluate pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Caelyx®) as adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who received surgery for pT1-3, any N, and luminal B-like early-stage breast cancer (EBC) candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy were included. PLD was administered intravenously at 20 mg/m2 biweekly for eight courses. Endocrine therapy was given according to menopausal status. Trastuzumab was administered in HER2-positive disease. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the feasibility of this regimen, defined as the ability of a patient to achieve a relative dose intensity (RDI) of at least 85% of the eight cycles of treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), tolerability, breast cancer-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Results: From March 2016 to July 2018, 63 patients were included in the trial. Median age was 49 years (range: 33–76), with mostly pre- and peri-menopausal (65%) and stage I–II (94%). Only 5% of patients had HER2-positive EBC. Median RDI was 100% (range: 12.5–100%; interquartile range, IQR: 87.5–100%). The proportion of patients meeting the primary endpoint was 84% (95% confidence interval, CI: 73–92%). Overall, 55 out of 63 enrolled patients completed treatment (87%, 95% CI: 77–94%). Most common AEs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (12.2%), fatigue (10.4%), and mucositis (8.5%). Only 13% of patients had G3 AEs. None had alopecia. After a median follow-up of 3.9 years (range: 0.3–4.7) two distant events were observed, and all patients were alive at the date of last visit. Conclusions: The trial successfully met its primary endpoint: the regimen was feasible and well tolerated and could be considered for further evaluation as a treatment option for patients with contraindications to standard anthracyclines or requiring a personalized, less intensive approach.

Effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus epirubicin as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a real-world study

Background Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an improved formulation of doxorubicin with comparable effectiveness but significantly lower cardiotoxicity than conventional anthracycline. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of PLD versus epirubicin as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Methods Clinical data of invasive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with PLD or epirubicin were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the risk of selection bias. The molecular typing of these patients included Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, and basal-like/triple-negative. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR) rate for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for adjuvant chemotherapy. Noninferiority was suggested if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the 3-year DFS rate difference was greater than − 10%. The secondary outcome was adverse reactions. Results A total of 1213 patients were included (neoadjuvant, n = 274; adjuvant, n = 939). pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) rates of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 11.6% for the PLD group and 7.0% for the epirubicin group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.4578). The 3-year DFS rate of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was 94.9% [95%CI, 91.1–98.6%] for the PLD group and 95.4% [95%CI, 93.0–97.9%] for the epirubicin group (P = 0.5684). Rate difference between the two groups and its 95% CI was - 0.55 [− 5.02, 3.92]. The lower limit of the 95% CI was − 5.0% > − 10.0%, suggesting that PLD is not be inferior to epirubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The incidences of myelosuppression, decreased appetite, alopecia, gastrointestinal reactions, and cardiotoxicity were lower in the PLD group than in the epirubicin group, while the incidence of nausea was higher in the PLD group. Conclusions In the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, effectiveness is similar but toxicities are different between the PLD-containing regimen and epirubicin-containing regimen. Therefore, further study is warranted to explore PLD-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.