Secondary leukemia following high cumulative doses of etoposide in patients treated for advanced germ cell tumors.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 3386-3391 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kollmannsberger ◽  
J Beyer ◽  
J P Droz ◽  
A Harstrick ◽  
J T Hartmann ◽  
...  

PURPOSE High cumulative epipodophyllotoxin dosages are reported to be associated with an elevated risk for secondary acute myeloid leukemia (s-AML). This study examined the risk of s-AML following cumulative etoposide doses greater than 2 g/m2 in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS The incidence of s-AML was retrospectively assessed in patients treated within clinical trials between January 1986 and February 1996 at four university centers. All patients received high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus autologous stem-cell support for metastatic GCT, including high cumulative etoposide doses (> 2 g/m2). Minimum patient follow-up was 12 months. Standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) was calculated to estimate the risk associated with high cumulative etoposide doses, as compared with the general population. RESULTS A total of 302 patients with a median age of 29 years (range, 15 to 55) received a median cumulative etoposide dose of 5 g/m2 (range, 2.4 to 14 g/m2). Four cases of s-AML were observed, which resulted in a cumulative incidence of 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38% to 3.59%) at 52 months of median follow-up (range, 12 to 198). Two cases of secondary myelodysplasia (s-MDS) developed in patients with primary mediastinal GCT. Based on the observed four cases of AML, which are most likely etoposide-related, the risk for developing s-AML (SMR, 160 [95% CI, 43.7 to 411.2]) is significantly increased in comparison to the age-matched general population. CONCLUSION Due to the low incidence of AML in the general population, the significantly elevated risk for developing s-AML affects only 1.3% of all patients who receive etoposide doses greater than 2 g/m2. HDCT, including etoposide doses greater than 2 g/m2, is associated with an acceptably low incidence of s-AML in patients with advanced GCT.

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. S97
Author(s):  
F. Morelli ◽  
A. Cisternino ◽  
A.M. Capotorto ◽  
G. Palomba ◽  
P. Setola ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15503-e15503
Author(s):  
John WT Walker ◽  
Scott A. North ◽  
Naveen S. Basappa ◽  
Peter M. Venner

e15503 Background: Primary mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (PMNSGCT) bear a worse prognosis than stage-matched testicular primaries, with a five year survival rate of 50%. In contrast to relapsed testicular NSGCT, retrospective analyses have not shown benefit to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HDCT/ ASCT) in PMNSGCT patients. Since publication of these studies, advancements in treatment regimens and supportive care have occurred, with emerging evidence suggesting HDCT/ASCT may benefit patients with PMNSGCT - both as first-line sequential treatment after standard-dose chemotherapy and at relapse. Objectives: Review the experience of patients presenting with PMNSGCT to a regional referral cancer center as a quality control assessment. Assess the benefit of salvage HDCT/ASCT to relapsed PMNSGCT patients. Methods: Patients presenting with PMNSGCT from 1980-2010 were abstracted from a Provincial cancer registry and records were retrospectively reviewed. Data includes patient demographics, cancer treatments and outcomes. Results: Fourteen male patients (median age 29; range: 17-54 years) with PMNSGCT were identified. Seven of 13 (54%) patients remain continuously disease-free with 1 patient lost to follow-up. Mean duration of follow-up in these patients is 57 (34-100) months. Three patients died having received ≤ 1 cycle of chemotherapy; exclusion of these patients results in a treatment failure rate of 30%. Six of the 7 cancer-free patients required salvage surgery. Three patients received tandem HDCT/ASCT (carboplatin 550 mg/m2 and etoposide 150 mg/m2daily for 4 days) at subsequent relapse despite second-line chemotherapy. Two remain disease-free at 45 and 74 months respectively, while the third patient died of their disease 14 months post-transplant. Conclusions: Our experience with PMNSGCT is generally consistent with published outcomes in that ≈50% of patients are cured. However, in this series 2/3 heavily pretreated patients were salvaged with HDCT/ASCT, refuting the published historical experience. This study is limited by its small sample size, but provides impetus to re-examine HDCT/ASCT for high-risk patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2778-2784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Lorch ◽  
Christian Kollmannsberger ◽  
Joerg Thomas Hartmann ◽  
Bernd Metzner ◽  
Ingo G.H. Schmidt-Wolf ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare single versus sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as first or subsequent salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCTs). Patients and Methods Between November 1999 and November 2004, 230 patients were planned to be recruited in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing one cycle of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, etoposide 375 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 6 g/m2 (VIP) plus three cycles of high-dose carboplatin 1,500 mg/m2 and etoposide 1,500 mg/m2 (CE; arm A) versus three cycles of VIP plus one cycle of high-dose carboplatin 2,200 mg/m2, etoposide 1,800 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 6,400 mg/m2 (CEC; arm B). Results The study was stopped prematurely after recruitment of 216 patients as a result of excess treatment-related mortality in arm B. One hundred eleven (51%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to sequential HDCT, and 105 (47%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to single HDCT. Five (2%) of 216 patients had to be excluded because of non-GCT histologies at review. With a median follow-up time of 36 months, 109 (52%) of 211 patients were alive, and 91 (43%) of 211 patients were progression free. At 1 year, event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 40%, 53%, and 80%, respectively, in arm A compared with 37%, 49%, and 61%, respectively, in arm B (P > .05 for all comparisons). Treatment-related deaths, mainly as a result of sepsis and cardiac toxicity, were less frequent in arm A (four of 108 patients, 4%) compared with arm B (16 of 103 patients, 16%; P < .01). Conclusion We found no difference in survival probabilities between single HDCT using CE and sequential HDCT using CEC. Sequential HDCT was better tolerated and resulted in fewer treatment-related deaths.


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. De Giorgi ◽  
T. Demirer ◽  
H. Wandt ◽  
C. Taverna ◽  
W. Siegert ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natraj Reddy Ammakkanavar ◽  
Daniela Matei ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Lawrence H. Einhorn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document