Trastuzumab prolonged administration: Safety and toxicity profile in heavily pre-treated patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10742-10742
Author(s):  
A. E. Tomadoni ◽  
R. C. Wainstein ◽  
M. N. Rondinón

10742 Background: HER2 over-expression was found to be an independent prognostic predictor of overall survival and time to relapse in breast cancer patients. Trastuzumab binds to the extracellular domain of HER2 cell receptor, thereby inhibiting the growth of breast cancer cells that over-express HER2. Objective: examine safety and toxicity profile of trastuzumab prolonged treatment (> 6 months) in heavily pre-treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: Between February 1999 and April 2005, 20 patients received weekly standard trastuzumab infusion until disease progression or serious adverse events. Population characteristics: median age: 46.6 years (30–65 years), ER+: 47.6%, PR+: 42.8%. Previous treatment: hormonotherapy: 12 patients (60%), two or more lines: 5 patients: (41.6%). All patients received previous chemotherapy: one line: 7 patients (35%), two lines: 10 (50%), three or more lines:3 (15%). Median trastuzumab treatment time was 11 months (6–36 months) Trastuzumab was administered as monotherapy in 5 patients (25%) and in combination in 15 patients (75%): 60% with docetaxel, 26.6% with paclitaxel, and 13.3 % with gemcitabine or vinorelbine Safety was primary trial end point, hence pre-treatment cardiac (baseline LVEF ≥55% by Echo or MUGA scan) and liver function assessment were required; and then, repeated each two months. Results: As regards cardiac adverse events, 2 patients (10%) receiving also docetaxel, developed supraventricular tachycardia reversible with 1 week treatment arrest. After 17 months, trastuzumab was discontinued in one of these two patients due to asymptomatic decrease in LVEF to 35 % (baseline LVEF:65%). An increase in transaninases (per 3ULN) was noted in one patient (5%) after 12 months of treatment. Liver function normalized after two weeks trastuzumab interruption. Allergic phenomena, as hot flashes or chills during first infusion was described in 3 patients (15%). In combination therapy, asthenia (20%), nausea (10%), anemia (10%), foot and hand syndrome (5%) and myalgia (5%) were observed. Conclusions: Prolonged tratuzumab administration in heavily pre-treated patients seems to be a safe approach with predictable profile and reversible toxicity with trastuzumab discontinuance and standard medical care. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 694-702
Author(s):  
Louai Alsaloumi ◽  
Shaima Shawagfeh ◽  
Abdikarim Abdi ◽  
Bilgen Basgut

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Capecitabine is frequently used alone or combined with other chemotherapy agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in relapsed patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of capecitabine monotherapy versus combination in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxane. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eligible randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy and safety of capecitabine alone compared to capecitabine combination were systematically searched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and grades 3–4 drug-related adverse events were the outcomes assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 6,714 patients of 9 trials were involved in the pooled analysis. Our findings demonstrated that capecitabine combination is significantly superior to capecitabine monotherapy in improving PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.13–1.54, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) and ORR (risk ratio [RR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.83, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), but it was insignificant in OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.12). On the other hand, the incidence of non-hematological adverse events such as hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea was lower in capecitabine combination compared to capecitabine monotherapy. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy showed superiority over capecitabine monotherapy in terms of PFS and ORR, with no significant difference in OS. Non-hematological adverse effects such as hand-foot syndrome were fewer with a combination regimen. However, hematological adverse events were fewer with capecitabine monotherapy regimen.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13017-13017
Author(s):  
T. Saeki ◽  
A. Okita ◽  
K. Aogi ◽  
T. Kakishita ◽  
R. Okita ◽  
...  

13017 Background: The mechanism of paclitaxel (PXL) resistance has been investigated. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on cell membrane could be an important target for improving efficacy of PXL. Toremifene (TOR) may moderate P-gp-related drug resistance in vitro. To determine safety and efficacy of PXL and TOR, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study for a combination chemo-endocrine treatment of PXL plus TOR for metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer, who were previously treated with a standard chemotherapy without PXL, were eligible. Patients received PXL 80 mg/m2(i.v.) weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in a cycle. Concurrently, toremifene 120mg/body (p.o.) was given dairy from day 1–28 in a cycle. For pharmacokinetic study, single agent of PXL was initially administrated on day 1, 8, and 15. From day 18, TOR 120mg/body was given dairy. On day 22, PXL administration in second cycle was skipped. On day 32, blood samples were collected from the patients received PXL 80 mg/m2 + TOR 120 mg/day/body. Samples were analyzed by HPLC (Unisil Q 5CN). Response was evaluated by WHO criteria and adverse events were evaluated by NCI•CTC Ver.2. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Out of 19, 15 patients had measurable disease, and 1 partial response, 8 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease were observed. The addition of TOR caused in no specific adverse events more than grade 3 and toxic profile in combination was similar that in PXL monotherapy. Pharmacokinetic profile of PXL was similar with/without TOR. In addition, Cmax of TOR was 1.85±0.71 mg/mL. Tmax was 2.9±1.8 hr were observed. AUC0–8 of TOR was not affected in the presence of PXL. AUC0- 8 of TOR-1, metabolite of TOR, also demonstrated the similar pharmacokinetic profile. Pharmacokinetic parameters of PXL did not reveal intra-patient variability in previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients. Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic profile in a combination of PXL and TOR was similar that in PXL monotherapy. The addition of TOR to PXL for previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients might be safety. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110061
Author(s):  
Ghazal Sadat Askarpour Moezian ◽  
Seyed Alireza Javadinia ◽  
Soodabeh Shahid Sales ◽  
Azar Fanipakdel ◽  
Sepideh Elyasi ◽  
...  

Background Chemotherapeutic agents, with or without other drugs and radiation, may cause indirect or direct hepatotoxicity. Doxorubicin-induced hepatotoxicity (DIH) is a major health concern in cancer patients receiving this cytotoxic drug that is mostly resulted from the production of reactive oxygen species leading to transient or permanent liver damages. Silymarin, a flavonoid extracted from the Silybum marianum, exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of systemic administration of silymarin in management of chemotherapy induced hepatotoxicity in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel (AC-T) regimen. Material: In this randomized, triple blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 30 patients who received AC-T who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated to silymarin (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15) groups to receive oral silymarin 140 mg three times a day or placebo tablets, respectively. Fatty liver severity was assessed by liver ultrasound imaging and FibroScan® and also measurement of liver function tests before and after the intervention. Results There was a non-significant trend toward more severe liver involvement in placebo group comparing to the silymarin group after intervention based on ultrasonography (p = 0.083). Besides, in silymarin group, hepatic involvement grade based on ultrasonography considerably reduced after intervention (p = 0.012). However, no difference was found between two groups based on FibroScan and liver function tests. Conclusion Oral administration of silymarin could significantly reduce hepatotoxicity severity after 1 month of treatment in non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with AC-T regimen.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Cazzaniga ◽  
V. Torri ◽  
F. Villa ◽  
N. Giuntini ◽  
F. Riva ◽  
...  

Background. Vinorelbine (VRB) and capecitabine (CAPE) are demonstrated to be active in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Different studies have demonstrated that the metronomic treatment is active with an acceptable toxicity profile. We designed a Phases I-II study to define the MTD of oral metronomic, VRB, and CAPE.Patients and Methods. Phase I: fixed dose of CAPE was 500 mg thrice a day, continuously. Level I of VRB was 20 mg/tot thrice a week for 3 weeks (1 cycle). Subsequent levels were 30 mg/tot and 40 mg/tot (Level III), respectively, if no Grades 3-4 toxicity were observed in the previous level. Phase II: further 32 patients received the MTD of VRB plus CAPE for a total of 187 cycles to confirm toxicity profile.Results. 12 patients were enrolled in Phase I and 22 in Phase II. Phase I: the MTD of VRB was 40 mg. Phase II: 187 cycles were delivered, observing 5.9% of Grades 3-4 toxicity. 31 patients are evaluable for efficacy, obtaining a clinical benefit rate of 58.1%.Conclusion. MTD of VRB with fixed dose of CAPE was 40 mg thrice a week and was the recommended dose for the ongoing Phase II multicenter study.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 609-609
Author(s):  
L. B. Michaud ◽  
E. Rivera ◽  
T. Madden ◽  
L. Esparza-Guerra ◽  
D. J. Booser ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document