A phase II study of ixabepilone (BMS 247550) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14646-14646 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Posadas ◽  
S. Undevia ◽  
A. D. Colevas ◽  
E. Manchen ◽  
E. E. Vokes ◽  
...  

14646 Introduction Ixabepilone (BMS) is a semi-synthetic analog of Epothilone B that functions as a microtubule stabilizer and has anti-cancer effects in several cancers including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (Zhuang, ASCO 2004). The initial phase II study in RCC utilized a difficult and unconventional dosing schedule (6 mg/m2 IV days 1–5 every 21 days). Hence, this phase II study in RCC was designed to verify previous observations and to test the safety, feasibility, and activity of administering BMS once every 3 weeks- a schedule used in other malignancies. Methods Treatment consists of BMS 40 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks. Eligibility included metastatic RCC with clear or non-clear cell histology, no limits on the number of previous treatments, performance status 0–2, and normal organ function. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate by RECIST criteria on radiologic evaluation conducted every 9 weeks. Accrual to the full planned 41 patients (pts) will proceed provided that 2 or more responses are observed in the first 21 pts. Results Ten pts have enrolled (4 clear cell) with 1 declining participation prior to receiving any treatment. Eight pts have completed at least 3 cycles. Grade 3–4 toxicities include lymphopenia-2, diarrhea-2, alopecia-1, and infection-1. Grade 1–2 toxicities seen in more than 50% of pts include alopecia, neuropathy, nausea, fatigue, anemia, and lymphopenia. We have observed 1 unconfirmed partial response of short duration and 1 pt exhibited stable disease with a minor response but discontinued treatment due to excessive neurotoxicity. Three pts continue on treatment. Conclusions Toxicity at 40 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks is higher than previously reported with the daily x 5 schedule. While lymphopenia, diarrhea, neuropathy, and fatigue are all expected adverse events, the rates of toxicity across all grades is higher than previous reports. VHL mutation analysis is planned and will be correlated with response to therapy. Accrual and pt follow up continue. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5112-5112 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Plimack ◽  
E. Jonasch ◽  
B. N. Bekele ◽  
L. A. Smith ◽  
J. C. Araujo ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 577-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Sun Jung ◽  
Jinhyun Cho ◽  
Kwai Han Yoo ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
...  

577 Background: Targeted therapy has shown remarkable treatment efficacy on the outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, this advance for treatment outcomes with targeted agents has been limited to patents with clear cell histology. The optimal treatment strategy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains uncertained. Recently, several vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors have shown efficacies for nccRCC. Thus, we designed a single-arm, open label phase II study to determine the efficacy and toxicity of pazopanib in patients with nccRCC. Methods: Patients with metastatic nccRCC except for collecting duct or sarcomatoid type received 800mg/day of pazopanib daily until progression of the disease or intolerable toxicity was observed. The primary objectives were progression free survival (PFS) and second objectives were overall survival (OS), treatment response and safety profiles. Results: A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled from September 2012 to August 2014. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 30-77 years) and 21 patients were male. The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 4.0-12.6 months) and median OS was not reached (range, 1.5-34.7 months). Among all 29 patients, five patients (17.2%) are ongoing treatment without disease progression. Disease progression was observed in 16 patients (55.2%) during follow up period. Five patients (17.2%) experienced a treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or more during the study and they stopped treatment in the end. Eight patients (27%) expired during follow up period but, there were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: This prospective phase II study showed that pazopanib demonstrated promising activity and tolerable safety in patients with nccRCC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01538238). Clinical trial information: NCT01538238.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 488-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Sun Jung ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Se-Hoon Lee ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 529-529
Author(s):  
Hideki Sakai ◽  
Kojiro Ohba ◽  
Katsuyoshi Hashine ◽  
Yoshihiko Tomita ◽  
Nobuo Shinohara ◽  
...  

529 Background: The potential of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative anticancer agent, for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been shown in two phase II studies. We therefore studied the efficacy and safety profile of S-1 in combination with sorafenib in Japanese patients with mRCC. The recommended dosage of this combination therapy was based on the results of an associated phase I study, presented at the 2012 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium (Abstract #447). Methods: In this phase II study, we enrolled patients with clear-cell or papillary carcinoma who had received no previous treatment or not more than 1 regimen of cytokine therapy. S-1 was administered orally at 80-120 mg/day according to body surface area for 28 consecutive days of a 42-day cycle in combination with sorafenib (800 mg/day) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), reviewed by an independent review committee. Results: A total of 21 patients aged 41-78 years were enrolled and were fully assessable for efficacy and safety. Most patients (90.5%) had clear-cell carcinoma, and 8 (38.1%) had received prior cytokine treatment. The ORR was 52.4% (90% CI, 32.8-71.4). One (4.8%) of the 21 patients had a complete response to this combination therapy, 10 (47.6%) had partial responses, and 10 (47.6%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.5-14.3). There were no deaths. This combination therapy was well tolerated, and most adverse events were grade 2 or lower. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events were hypophosphatemia (71.4%) and elevated lipase levels (33.3%). Conclusions: Combination therapy with S-1 plus sorafenib showed promising results regarding the primary endpoint of ORR and had an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with mRCC. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-090973.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5104-5104 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jonasch ◽  
C. G. Wood ◽  
S. Matin ◽  
P. Tamboli ◽  
K. Do ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 2108-2114 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-L. Lee ◽  
J.-H. Ahn ◽  
H.Y. Lim ◽  
S.H. Park ◽  
S.H. Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document