A phase II study of oral S-1 with pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomic investigation in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4072-4072
Author(s):  
S. Y. Rha ◽  
H. C. Jeung ◽  
H. K. Kim ◽  
S. Y. Kim ◽  
S. Y. Kim ◽  
...  

4072 Background: Present study describes the first phase II study of S-1 including pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic evaluation for extra-Japanese Asian population with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Chemo-naive advanced gastric cancer with measurable disease was enrolled. Initial dose of S-1 was b.i.d. at 35, then 40 mg/m2 according to devised dosing method (range, 90–160 mg/day) for 28 days every 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetic study was performed after 28-day administration at cycle 1 and 3. Microarray based CGH was performed with genomic DNA from peripheral mononuclear cells to detect the toxicity-related genetic changes. Results: When first 31 patients were enrolled, protocol was amended to conduct the study by two steps for additional patients at 40 mg/m2 without dose escalation in initial 31 patients of 35 mg/m2, because these patients showed neither significant nor cumulative toxicity. Of 62 patients enrolled, median relative dose intensity was 0.99. Overall response rate was 19.3% (95% CI, 9.2–29.5). With 558-day follow-up duration, median TTP and OS were 126 and 264 days, respectively. One-year survival rate was 33.9%. Toxicity increased with dose escalation, but there was no grade 4 toxicity. The most common significant toxicity was anemia. Pharmacokinetics parameters were similar to those of Japanese population. In microarray-CGH, we selected 18 genes with different copy numbers of 13 amplified and 5 deleted genes in patients with anemia. Conclusions: Our phase II study showed the feasibility of S-1 in gastric cancer at the dose of 35 mg/m2, and we suggested that selected 18 genes might be candidate markers for predicting anemia with S-1 treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15052-15052
Author(s):  
S. Cho ◽  
H. Shim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
J. Ahn ◽  
D. Yang ◽  
...  

15052 Background: Taxane has been used widely in advanced gastric cancer, but toxicities are problematic. To avoid the bone marrow suppression, docetaxel could be replaced paclitaxel to reduce bone marrow suppression and to improve the efficacy, we planned to augmentation of the dose intensity. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma, ECOG PS = 2, at least one measurable lesion and adequate organ functions were eligible. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) were given as a 1-h intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2) as a 24-h continuous infusion for 5 days. This cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. Results: Forty-five eligible patients (median age 56 years) were treated in this way. Of the 41 patients in whom efficacy was evaluable, an objective response rate (ORR) was seen in 20 (48.8%), a complete response in two, and a partial response in 18 patients. The median time to progression was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.86–7.94), and the median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.83–17.37). The main hematological toxicity was neutropenia and greater than grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 67 cycles (25%). Febrile neutropenia developed in three patients (7.3%). The major non-hematological toxicities were asthenia and peripheral neuropathy, but grade 3 or 4 toxicity was not seen. Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU is a promising regimen, and was well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS183-TPS183
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ishiguro ◽  
Yasuyuki Kawamoto ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Yoshimitsu Kobayashi ◽  
Kazuaki Harada ◽  
...  

TPS183 Background: As second-line chemotherapy for gastric cancer, a survival benefit has been shown in several clinical trials. Irinotecan and taxanes are recommended as second-line regimen. However, therapeutic outcomes have remained unsatisfactory and more effective treatment are expected. Ramucirumab (RAM) is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) antibody that prevents ligand binding of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D and the receptor-mediated pathway activation in endothelial cells, subsequently inhibiting neovascularization. In the REGARD study, RAM monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma improved median overall survival (mOS) compared with placebo. Moreover, in the RAINBOW study, RAM plus paclitaxel (PTX) versus placebo plus PTX, mOS showed significantly longer in RAM plus PTX group than in placebo plus PTX group. In contrast, there are no data on the efficacy of RAM and irinotecan in the second-line treatment for gastric cancer. The WJOG 4007 study demonstrated an equivalent efficacy between irinotecan and PTX. In this study, we propose to examine the efficacy of RAM plus irinotecan. Methods: This study is carried out as a multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, prospective, phase II study. The patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer that is refractory or intolerance to primary chemotherapy are eligible for this study. RAM and irinotecan combination therapy is administered every two weeks, which is continued until progression or emergence of adverse events requiring discontinuation. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival rate at six months, and the secondary endpoints are OS, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and dose intensity for each drug. A total of 35 cases areplanned for registration. This study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030372.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. ii28
Author(s):  
Goto Masahiro ◽  
Imamura Hiroshi ◽  
Kawase Tomono ◽  
Kimura Yutaka ◽  
Ueda Shugo ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1013-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunori Emi ◽  
Manabu Yamamoto ◽  
Ikuo Takahashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Orita ◽  
Yoshihiro Kakeji ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.Y. Kim ◽  
J.H. Kim ◽  
S.-H. Lee ◽  
T.Y. Kim ◽  
D.S. Heo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. ii39
Author(s):  
Iwasa Satoru ◽  
Hamaguchi Tetsuya ◽  
Nagashima Kengo ◽  
Goto Masahiro ◽  
Okazaki Shunsuke ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-196
Author(s):  
Akihito Kawazoe ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Chin Keisho ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Takashi Ikeno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document