Effect of front-line therapy with either high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue (HDT/ASCR) or dose-intensive therapy (R-Hypercvad) on outcome in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8067-8067 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Feldman ◽  
A. R. Mato ◽  
T. Zielonka ◽  
A. Masood ◽  
S. Goldberg ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3759-3759
Author(s):  
Andrew D Zelenetz ◽  
Craig Moskowitz ◽  
Jocelyn Maragulia ◽  
Carol S. Portlock ◽  
Julie Teruya-Feldstein

Abstract Introduction: Optimal management of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains undefined. However, recent data support the conclusion that upfront consolidation with high dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDT/ASCR) can improve the PFS (Dreyling, et al., 2005; Geisler, et al., 2008) and possibly OS (Geisler, et al. 2008). Based on gene expression profiling data, the proliferation signature has emerged as a critical determinant of prognosis in MCL (Rosenwald, et al., 2003). Immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation as estimated by MIB-1 (Ki-67) staining has been shown to predict outcome in patients with MCL treated with chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy. With conventional chemotherapy, the reported MIB-1 staining cutoff associated with poor prognosis reportedly varies from 10–30%. Since 1994 we have treated patients (pts) with MCL with sequential chemotherapy followed by HDT/ASCR. The current analysis is a retrospective review of our treatment program focused on the impact of upfront consolidation with HDT/ASCR on the prognostic significance of proliferation as measured by MIB-1 immunohistochemistry. Methods: Seventy-nine patients underwent upfront consolidation with HDT/ASCR for MCL. Fifty-two patients had evaluation of proliferation by MIB-1 immunohistochemistry. MIB-1 expression was estimated visually and assigned a percentage. Patients were binned into quintiles of MIB-1 expression: 0–20% (n=32, 61.5%); 21–40% (n=5, 9.6%); 41–60% (n=5, 9.6%); 61–80% (n=5, 9.6%); and 81–100% (n=5, 9.6%). Outcomes were analyzed by the method of Kaplan-Meier and comparisons were by log-rank. Results: The EFS and OS at 5 years was 65.1% and 61.4% respectively for the subset of patients with available MIB-1 staining (n=52); the outcomes for the entire group (n=79) did not differ from the subset. Outcomes (PFS, OS) were evaluated by MIB-1 quintile with successive cutoff values of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80%. MIB-1 cutoff values of 40% or less were not predictive of outcome. However, when the cutoff was 60% or 80%, both the PFS and OS were significantly worse for the high proliferation group. Nineteen percent of patients had a proliferation fraction of greater than 60%. For patients with MIB-1 staining of >60% the PFS was 4.2 years and was not reached for the group with staining ≤60% (p=0.004). Similarly, overall survival was significantly different, (p=0.031). Conclusions: These findings suggest that upfront consolidation with HDT/ASCR can partially overcome the adverse impact of proliferation on outcome and the adverse outcomes are seen in a subgroup of approximately 20% of patients with MIB-1 staining of greater than 60%.


Cancer ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 104 (7) ◽  
pp. 1434-1441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Daciana Antal ◽  
Laurence Lacotte-Thierry ◽  
Vincent Delwail ◽  
Daniel Espinouse ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (6) ◽  
pp. 999-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Rule ◽  
Gordon Cook ◽  
Nigel H. Russell ◽  
Ann Hunter ◽  
Stephen Robinson ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1226-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rony Schaffel ◽  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Jocelyn C. Maragulia ◽  
Carol S. Portlock ◽  
Cyrus V. Hedvat ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1226 Poster Board I-248 Background The value of FDG-PET in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has not been addressed in a homogeneous group of pts. The optimal initial therapy is controversial; however, intensified therapy followed by consolidation with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue (HDT-ASCR) is associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to CHOP-based therapy. In this study, we examined the prognostic value of FDG-PET in a group of uniformly treated pts with upfront HDT-ASCR consolidation. The role of FDG-PET was evaluated: at baseline; as a predictor of proliferation index (PI); and as interim evaluation after induction therapy prior to HDT-ASCR. Pts and Methods Pts received sequential therapy consisting of sequential R-CHOP-14 × 4 followed by RICE x 2-3 cycles and consolidation with HDT-ASCR. FDG-PET and diagnostic CT imaging was obtained at baseline and after R-CHOP (N=75). The number of cycles of RICE was determined by the PET and CT response after induction with R-CHOP-14×4; pts with FDG-avid disease received a third cycle. Additional therapy was administered in 10 pts who had persistent FDG-avid disease after RICE with the objective of achieving the best response prior to the HDT-ASCR. Therapy included bortezomib in 7 cases and other treatment in 3 cases. The PI was determined by quantitative image analysis of Ki-67 stained slides (N=39). The median follow-up was 3.4 years. Results The median age was 59 years, 71% had bone marrow disease and 85% had stage 4 disease. According to the MIPI score, 50% had low-risk, 35% had intermediate-risk and 15% had high-risk disease. The baseline FDG-PET was positive in 71 pts (95%) and the median SUV was 5.5 (1.6-14). The baseline SUV was not prognostic after the stratification of the pts by the median SUV (PFS 81% vs 84% and overall survival (OS) 100% vs 74%, p=0.15). The median PI was 22% for the pts with an SUV below the median and 36% for the other group (P=0.03, Mann-Whitney). Interim FDG-PET evaluation after induction with R-CHOP-14 was available in 69 pts among the 71 with a positive test at baseline, the exam was negative in 49 pts (71%). A negative interim FDG-PET was associated with a better PFS (84% v 40% at 4years, p<0.0001) and a better OS (94% v 70% at 4 years, p=0.019). When FDG-PET results were added to response determined by CT scan, there was no difference in PFS between FDG-PET negative with either a CT CR (N=28) or CT PR (N=20) (91% vs 73% at 4 years, P=0.89). In contrast, patients with a CT PR had an inferior PFS and OS when the FDG-PET was positive (N=19) compared when the FDG-PET was negative (42% vs 76% at 4 years, P=0.008). The 4-year OS was 96% for FDG-PET negative CT CR, 91% for FDG-PET negative CT PR and 70% for FDG-PET positive CT PR (P=0.08). Conclusions In MCL, a baseline FDG-PET is useful as not all cases are positive. Though SUV correlates with the PI, the pretreatment SUV alone is not prognostic. Pts in PR by CT are separated by the FDG-PET result with negative pts having a superior outcome. The interim FDG-PET after induction with R-CHOP-14 × 4 is prognostic for PFS and OS in a program of sequential therapy with upfront consolidation with HDT/ASCR. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1256-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Yoon Cheah ◽  
John F. Seymour ◽  
Michael L. Wang

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma previously considered to have a poor prognosis. Large gains were made in the first decade of the new century when clinical trials established the importance of high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell rescue and high-dose cytarabine in younger patients and the benefits of maintenance rituximab and bendamustine in older patients. In particular, greater depth of understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of MCL has resulted in an explosion of specifically targeted new efficacious agents. In particular, agents recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration include the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, immunomodulator lenalidomide, and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. We review recent advances in the understanding of MCL biology and outline our recommended approach to therapy, including choice of chemoimmunotherapy, the role of stem-cell transplantation, and mechanism-based targeted therapies, on the basis of a synthesis of the data from published clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document