Initial Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Managed at Chinese Academic Centers in the Rituximab Era: A Real-World Study

PurposeThe aim of the study was to delineate the disease characteristics, the initial treatment patterns, and survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) managed in the real world.MethodsData of 518 MCL patients from 5 major Chinese Hematology Centers in the period from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsThe median age was 58 years. Of the patients, 88.6% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0–1 and 80.7% had advanced-stage disease. Ki67 expression was <30% in 39.6% of the patients, and 43.2% of patients were categorized into a low-risk group based on the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) scoring system. Overall, 73.4% of the patients received rituximab as their first-line therapy. The most commonly used chemotherapy was the CHOP-like (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunomycin, oncovin, and prednisone) regimen (45.2%), followed by high-dose cytarabine-containing chemotherapy (31.3%) and bendamustine (3.3%). Of the patients, 13.7% (n = 71) underwent consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and 19.3% (n = 100) received novel agents containing first-line regimens. With a median follow-up time of 52 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 73.7% and 61.4%, respectively. Age ≤60 years, ECOG PS 0–1, stages I–II, normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), absence of bone marrow involvement, Ki67 <30%, and lower-risk IPI/MIPI scores were significantly associated with improved OS (p < 0.05). The inclusion of rituximab improved the 5-year OS, with borderline significance (62.5% vs. 55.2%, p = 0.076). High-dose cytarabine-containing chemotherapy showed significant clinical benefit in 5-year OS (72.1% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.010). Patients with ASCT had better 5-year OS in the younger (≤60 years) age group (87.2% vs. 64.8%, p = 0.002).ConclusionThis large retrospective dataset unequivocally confirmed the survival advantage afforded by cytarabine-containing regimen and ASCT in a first-line setting under real-world management in the rituximab era.

A Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of G-CSF and G-CSF/GM-CSF for the Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells by Mitoxantrone and High-Dose Cytarabine Chemotherapy

We investigated the efficiency of mitoxantrone (MIT) and high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) chemotherapy followed by G-CSF and G-CSF/GM-CSF treatments for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in patients with leukemia and lymphoma. MIT was intravenously injected at 10 mg/(m2·d) for 2 to 3 days, followed by Ara-C injected intravenously at 2 g/m2 every 12 hours for 1 to 2 days. When white blood cell count recovered from the lowest value, 5 to 7.5 μg/ (kg·d) G-CSF was administered in 23 patients for 5 to 7 successive days. Another 27 patients received 3-5 μg/ (kg·d) G-CSF and 3-5μg/ (kg·d) GM-CSF. Autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected. Levels of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells were determined after unfreezing. The CD34+ cells and CFU-GM yields of 27 patients in G-CSF plus GM-CSF combination group [(8.79±3.11)×106/kg, (3.52±1.34)×105/kg, respectively] were significantly higher than those of patients receiving G-CSF alone (n=23) [(6.14±2.06)×106/kg, (2.03±1.06)×105/kg, respectively (P < 0.05)]. No obvious changes of T lymphocyte subsets in patients were observed when using G-CSF/GM-CSF, but levels of CD34+ cells increased gradually (P>0.05). The end-point separation blood volume was all above trebling TBV. No severe complications were observed during the mobilization and collection. Autologous PBSCT obtained quick hematopoietic reconstitution. In conclusion, MA chemotherapy combined with G-CSF alone and G-CSF/GM-CSF can safely and effectively mobilize autologous PBSCs, while G-CSF plus GM-CSF is superior to G-CSF alone. Large volume leukapheresis is an important method to enhance the production rate of stem cells and decrease harvesting time.

Phase I Dose-Finding Study of Eltrombopag Following High Dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background: Thrombocytopenia is prevalent at presentation and following induction chemotherapy (chemo) regimens in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Eltrombopag (EPAG), oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin (TPO)-receptor agonist, is currently approved for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia, hepatitis-associated thrombocytopenia, and aplastic anemia. It has also been evaluated as a strategy to mitigate chemo-induced thrombocytopenia in pts with solid tumors, myelodysplastic syndrome, and following allotransplant. Prior studies have demonstrated that EPAG can directly inhibit the proliferation of human AML cells in vitro. Although EPAG has been studied following induction and consolidation chemo in the frontline AML setting, to date, the tolerability and efficacy of EPAG in pts receiving salvage chemo for R/R AML is not known. Objectives: This study's objectives were to (a) estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of EPAG, (b) examine platelet (plt) response (defined as plt count ≥ 100 x 10 9/L), and (c) anti-leukemic activity of EPAG in pts receiving high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) and mitoxantrone (Mito) for R/R AML. Methods: In this phase I open-label study, adult pts (³ 18 yrs) with R/R AML with adequate organ functions and grade 4 thrombocytopenia following HiDAC (given every 12 hrs (3 g/m 2 for age &lt; 50; 1.5 g/m 2 for age ≥50) for 12 doses) and Mito (dosed at 12 mg/m 2 x 3 doses every other day) were eligible. All pts must have had marrow hypoplasia demonstrated on Day 14 ± 3 days from the initiation of HiDAC. EPAG was started daily on Day 14 ± 3 days with dose determined using a standard '3+3' dose-escalation design. EPAG was discontinued if an adequate plt response was achieved or following 9 weeks of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) window was defined as the first 15 days of EPAG dosing. Results: Nine pts with R/R AML were enrolled (Table 1). Median age was 64 yrs (range, 33-80), and 5 pts were men. All pts had intermediate (6/9, 67%), adverse (2/9, 22%), or unknown (1/9, 11%) cytogenetic risk disease. One (1/9) pt had NPM1+FLT3-ITD+ disease. Five pts (56%) had relapsed disease (2pts had prior allotransplant). All pts received HiDAC+Mito chemo and started on EPAG on Day 14 ± 3 days. Three received EPAG 150 mg, and 6 pts received 200 mg daily. The median duration on EPAG was 26 days (range, 11-82). One pt experienced a DLT of grade 3 myocardial ischemia while receiving EPAG 200 mg/day and was taken off study. No other DLTs were reported, and no MTD was determined. The most frequent grade ³3 adverse events (AEs, Table 2): were bacteremia (56%), neutropenic fever (44%), and hyperbilirubinemia (33%). Similarly, common grade 1-2 AEs consisted of hyperbilirubinemia, tachycardia, and confusion (33% each, respectively). At a median follow-up of 30.3 months (mo), all 9 pts had discontinued EPAG. Six pts (67%) achieved plt response (3 each in 150 mg and 200 mg/day dose level). The median time to achieve plt response and the duration of plt response was 27 days (range, 14-41) and 40.5 mo (range, 2-49.6), respectively. Three other pts discontinued EPAG therapy: 1 each due to cardiac ischemia, donor lymphocyte infusion, and patient choice, respectively (Table 3). Of note, 7/9 pts (78%) had clinical response: CR in 5 (56%), CRc (CR+CRp) in 6 (67%), MLFS in 1 (11%, Table 4). Two (2/7 responders) went on to subsequent allotransplant, and 6 died; 2-progressive disease, one each from pneumonia, failure to thrive, encephalopathy, and unknown cause, respectively. Among the 6 pts who achieved plt recovery on EPAG, 5 achieved CR and 1-MLFS following HiDAC+Mito. Conclusion: This phase 1 dose-finding study demonstrated that EPAG 150-200 mg daily following HiDAC+Mito chemo for R/R AML was well tolerated with one DLT of cardiac ischemia (200 mg dose). Two-thirds (67%) of pts achieved plt recovery on EPAG after a median of 27 days (range, 14-41). In these small number of pts (n=9), addition of EPAG therapy did not seem to adversely affect clinical outcomes (CRc 67%) and may have contributed to long-term platelet recovery. Further studies are required to determine the optimal schedule and potential benefit of EPAG added to chemo regimens for R/R AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Przespolewski: Jazz: Research Funding. Griffiths: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Taiho Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Elshoury: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Other: advisory board. Wang: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, steering committee, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data safety monitoring committee; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Genentech: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy.

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment and Outcome of Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Large, Multicenter Retrospective Analysis in China

Background Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon heterogeneous subtype of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, most MCL cases have a rapid evolution and an aggressive behavior with an unfavorable outcome. Clinical features in mantle cell lymphoma appeared regional characteristics and the epidemiology of MCL in Asia is not accurate documented. MCL treatment opinions are not uniform between country/region within Asia and China. At present, the large-scale Asian patient-specific data for the treatment of MCL are lacking. Aims To obtain 'real world' clinical characteristics,treatment patterns and prognosis factors of MCL patients in China and to address the knowledge gap in Chinese MCL patients. Methods Patients diagnosed with MCL between April 1999 and December 2019 at 19 comprehensive hospitals in China were included in this retrospective analysis. The median follow-up times was 36.0 months. The data of total 805 patients with mantle cell lymphoma were collected, 112 patients with incomplete clinical data, no chemotherapy and missing follow-up data were excluded. Finally, 693 patients with complete clinical data, treatment information and survival follow-up data were included in this study.Fully detailed information of patients, disease characteristics, treatments and outcomes were collected. Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-squared test were used to compare categorical variables.Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier. Results The median age of the cohort was 60.0 years with a male-to-female ratio of 3.36:1. 477 patients (68.8%) were younger than 65 years at diagnosis.Advanced stage of diseases were 90.0%. Extranodal organ involvement was 83.4% and the most frequently involved extranodal organs were bone marrow(46.2%), spleen(36.1%), gastrointestinal tract(24.8) and oropharynx(17.7%). Blastic/pleomorphic mantle cell lymphoma accounted for 12.8%, and non-nodular mantle cell lymphoma accounted for 3.3%. Ki-67 more than 30% was 57.7% and Ki-67 ≥ 50% was 26.1%. The intermediate /high risk group was 49.8% according to MIPI score. The first-line therapeutic schedule is not completely unified, the most frequently regimen was CHOP/CHOP-like±R (n=312,45.0%) ,then high-dose cytarabine (n=222,32.0%), VR-CAP(n=44,6.3%), BR(n=30,4.3%), R-EPOCH (n = 17, 2.5%), FC / FCM±R regimen (n = 13,1.9%),and 55 patients(7.9%) uesd chemo-free regimen including IR / R2 / IR2 .Only 80 patients (11.5%) received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as consolidation therapy after chemotherapy remission. The ORR rate was 85.0%with 46.6% CR and 38.4% PR in the initial treatment.During the follow-up to June 2021(2-204months), 222 patients(32.0%) had died. The 5-year PFS and OS was 30.9% and 65.0%respectively.In the multivariate Cox regression model, ki67 ≥ 50% (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.01-1.60, p = 0.038) ,stageⅢ/Ⅳ (HR1.56, 95%CI 1.05-2.33, p = 0.029),high- intermediate/high risk group accouding to MIPI-c (HR1.56, 95%CI 1.05-2.33, p = 0.008),spleen involvment (HR1.35, 95%CI 1.08-1.69, p = 0.009),without maintenance treatment (HR0.71, 95%CI 0.56-0.88, p = 0.003) ,SD/PD in inital treatment (HR6.20, 95%CI4.71-8.14, p &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with poorer PFS while ki67 ≥50% (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.31-2.31, p&lt; 0.001),B symtom (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.15-2.00, p = 0.003), high-intermediate/high risk group accouding to MIPI-c (HR1.43, 95%CI 1.24-1.64, p &lt; 0.001),without high-dose cytarabine (HR0.47, 95%CI 0.31-0.70 ,p &lt; 0.001) ,without maintenance treatment (HR0.40, 95%CI 0.28-0.58,p &lt; 0.001)and relapse/refractory state (HR 4.04, 95%CI 2.21-7.39, p &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with poorer OS. Conclusions This study describes the characteristics of mantle cell lymphoma in Chinese population with younger onset age and a higher tumor proliferation index. High dose cytarabine treatment and maintenance treatment have shown survival benefits in real-world.Recurrence and refractory is an important factor affecting survival,the strategy of combining molecular biological characteristics with novel strategies may improve outcome in these patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Implementation of a High-Dose Cytarabine Outpatient Program for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in a Limited-Source Setting

Background: The management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients usually requires long inpatient treatments that can affect the limited care facilities, the quality of life, and increases healthcare costs. Additionally, leukemia treating centers in developing countries face limited sources to deliver high-dose chemotherapies as inpatient treatments. Therefore, several reports have established the feasibility and safety of outpatient consolidation. We aimed to implement a high-dose cytarabine outpatient program for AML in a limited-source institution at a public center in Peru.Methods: We conducted a prospective pilot study starting in January 2019 and ending before the COVID-19 Pandemic in March 2020. Eligible patients were ≥ age 14, met inclusion criteria for inpatient induction regimens, were without active infection, and had the following: normal chest x-ray and biochemistry, complete remission after one cycle of 7+3 induction. Logistical requirements included a 3-hours distance residence near the treatment center, caregiver support, trained nursing staff, infusion room capacity, and participation in follow-up. Patients received prophylactic antimicrobials such as oral levofloxacin, fluconazole, and acyclovir and were admitted to the hospital for predetermined complications of therapy (fever, G3-4 toxicity, febrile neutropenia, bleeding or refractory thrombocytopenia). Risk stratification was based on conventional cytogenetics and multiplex PCR using Leukemia.net criteria. Results: Forty-two patients were included during the study period. The median age was 38 years (16-63) and Female/Male ratio 4:3. According to Leukemia.net, 24% were classified as high, 50% intermediate and 26% as low risk group. Including FLT3 mutations in 26% of cases. Twenty-two and 20 subjects received 1-2 and 3-4 cycles of ambulatory HiDAC, respectively. About one-third of cases had emergency admissions during consolidation and 74% complete at least 3 cycles of cytarabine. Only 4 patients underwent sibling-donor allo-SCT. Sixty-four percent experienced relapses, and at 2 years follow-up only 21 subjects were alive. Median OS was 15 months, a better survival was shown among patients who received 3-4 cycles of ambulatory HiDAC (2-year OS 18 vs 23%, p=0.031). Conclusion: Our pilot study shows the feasibility to deliver HiDAC as outpatient consolidation in selected AML cases in a limited setting. Additionally, a high rate of relapses and poor survival was noted in our cohort that requires further consideration. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Omission of High-Dose Cytarabine during Consolidation Therapy of Ph-Positive ALL Patients Treated with Nilotinib and Low-Intensity Chemotherapy Results in an Increased Risk of Relapses Despite Non-Inferior Levels of Late BCR-ABL1 MRD Response. First Results of the Randomized Graaph-2014 Study

On behalf of the GRAALL group. Introduction. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the outcome of patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In a previous randomized trial (GRAAPH-2005; Chalandon Y., Blood 2015), our group demonstrated that anthracycline and cyclophosphamide could be safely omitted during the first Hyper-CVAD chemotherapy cycle when combined to imatinib. In the present GRAAPH-2014 trial, we investigated whether the use of nilotinib, a 2 nd generation TKI, would allow further decreasing chemotherapy intensity through the omission of high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) during consolidation cycles 2 and 4. Methods. From March 2016, patients aged 18-60 years old were randomized frontline to receive 4 cycles (1=3, 2=4) of chemotherapy combined with continuous nilotinib 400 mg bid. Cycle 1 and 3 were similar in both arms, identical to the less-intensive first cycle of the previous GRAAPH-2005 trial with weekly vincristine and dexamethasone and nilotinib instead of imatinib. Cycle 2 and 4 differed between control arm A (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h, HD-AraC 3 g/sqm/12h for 2 days) and experimental arm B (MTX 1 g/sqm over 24h only). Marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by both BCR-ABL1 and IG-TCR qPCR after each cycle (MRD1-4). Patients in complete remission (CR) after cycle 4 were eligible to receive allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Non allografted patients had the option to receive autologous SCT (autoSCT) if a major molecular response (MMolR) (MRD4 BCR-ABL1 &lt;0.1%) was achieved. AlloSCT and autoSCT were followed by a 2-year imatinib maintenance. The randomization was stratified on age (≤40y, &gt;40y) and BCR-ABL1 breakpoint region (M/m-bcr). MMolR rate at MRD4 was the primary endpoint of this non-inferiority study, with a margin set at 0.15. In February 2019, the study DSMB decided to stop the randomizations after an unplanned analysis demonstrating a significant excess of relapse in arm B (without HD-AraC). An intention-to-treat analysis is provided. All patients gave informed consent. The study is registered at EudraCT under the number: 2014-002146-44. Results. A total of 156 patients were randomized (77 in arm A, and 79 in arm B). Median age was 47.1 years old (range 18.1-59.9). One-hundred and ten patients had the m-bcr (70.5%) and 46 (29.5%) the M-bcr. An IKZF1 intragenic deletion was found in 87/153 (56.9%). Median follow-up was 2.8 years (95%CI 2.6-3.1). All evaluable patients reached CR after a maximum of two cycles. Three patients died during cycle 1 (2 in arm A, 1 in arm B), and 2 during cycle 2 (1 per arm). Most patients received the 4 scheduled cycles (n=143, 91,7%). AlloSCT was performed in 91 patients (58.3%), whereas 41 patients received an autoSCT (26.3%) with no difference in allo/autoSCT rates between arms. A non-inferiority in late MRD response (MRD4) between the two arms was observed (primary endpoint). MMolR was reached in 55/75 (73.3%) and 61/78 (78.2%) of CR patients in arm A and B, respectively, with an estimated 95% CI of difference of -11% to +16% (-9.2% to +20.8% in the ITT analysis treating missing data as failures). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) was 86.0% in arm A versus 74.2% in arm B (p=.08, Figure A). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 79.6% in arm A versus 57.2% in arm B (p=.008, Figure B). Thirty-one patients experienced hematological relapse (8 in arm A and 23 in arm B). Twenty-height out of 31 relapsed patients were tested for the acquisition of BCR-ABL1 mutations, 20/28 (71%) had at least one mutation and 10/28 (36%) had a T315I mutation. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 21.3%, significantly higher in arm B than in arm A (30.8% vs 10.6%, p=.007). When analyzing the CIR considering alloSCT as a competing event for relapse, a significant higher CIR was still observed in arm B as compared to arm A (Figure C). Conclusion. Four cycles of the combined administration of nilotinib and chemotherapy is very efficient for bridging younger adults with Ph-positive ALL to SCT. However, omitting HD-AraC is associated with a higher relapse incidence despite non-inferior levels of BCR-ABL1 MRD4. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Amgen: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Vincent: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Raffoux: PFIZER: Consultancy; CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy; ASTELLAS: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy. Boissel: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Nilotinib as a therapy for PH-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Reducing Length of Stay for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Inpatient High-Dose Cytarabine Consolidation Chemotherapy

Background For patients receiving high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) at the University of Virginia Health System between 10/2019 and 10/2020, median length of stay (LOS) from time of clinic appointment to hospital discharge exceeded the expected standard treatment time (119.4 hours vs 112 hours). Despite the final dose of chemotherapy being scheduled for completion by 9:00 am on the planned day of discharge, only 50% of patients receiving HiDAC were successfully discharged by 12:00 pm (3 hours post-chemotherapy completion). Though there are no national standards for duration of inpatient stay for planned chemotherapy, LOS that extends beyond the standard treatment time results in increased cost, overutilization of hospital resources, delayed admissions for future patients, and patient dissatisfaction. Methods A multidisciplinary team of licensed providers, pharmacists, and nurses was formed. Due to inconsistency in admission times, the team focused on the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm as a surrogate marker for LOS. The aim was to increase the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm to 65%. Reviewing the baseline data revealed an unstable process with a 3-sigma XmR statistical process control chart. The team developed current and ideal process state maps, a Pareto chart, and a priority matrix to determine an action plan. The most common identified causes for delay in discharge included: lack of standardized discharge checklist, discharge order placed after 10:00 am, medications dispensed from the outpatient pharmacy after 11:00 am, licensed providers not prioritizing patients who were pending discharge, and medication reconciliation not completed prior to day of discharge. Results From 10/2020 to 5/2021, the first PDSA cycle focused on standardizing the discharge process to correct the instability in the process. A discharge checklist was created based on the ideal process map, which allowed providers to have a consistent process at discharge. A 3-sigma XmR chart demonstrated a newly stable process and an increase in percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm to 58% (14 of 24). The second PDSA cycle from 6/2021 to 8/2021 addressed the high impact/easy effort interventions identified in the priority matrix: providers completed medication reconciliation the day before discharge, prioritized seeing HiDAC discharge patients first during morning rounds, and ensured discharge orders were placed prior to completion of the last chemotherapy infusion. Following these interventions, the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm increased to 66% (4 of 6). Conclusions Using quality improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team developed an action plan for patients receiving HiDAC that has increased the percentage of patients discharged by 12:00 pm. This outcome may lead to decreased length of stay, reduced hospitalization costs, and increased bed availability for other hematology/oncology patients. Further PDSA cycles are planned and will focus on the pharmacy medication delivery service, and continuous evaluation of the process is ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures El Chaer: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

The Intensity of the Induction Regimen Does Not Affect Post-Transplant Survival Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

The routine use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission have significantly improved outcomes for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (Hermann et al, jco 2009). The choice of the most appropriate induction regimen prior to transplant remains a controversial topic. Adding high dose cytarabine to RCHOP among young patients (&lt;65 years) results in superior PFS, higher toxicity but no improvement in overall survival when compared to RCHOP alone (Hermine O et al, Lancet 2016). The use of bendamustine/Rituxan (BR) compared to RCHOP in 2 randomized studies showed lower toxicity, higher PFS but similar overall survival. In this study, we investigated the effect of induction regimen intensity and the use of high dose cytarabine on post autologous stem cell transplant outcomes among MCL patients treated at our center. 59 patients who received ASCT for MCL between 2010 and 2020 were included in this analysis. Data were retrieved from our database where it was entered prospectively. Median age at diagnosis was 60 (45,76) years, stage IV (85%), B symptoms (32%), MIPI score (low 17%, intermediate 47%, high 28%) and ECOG performance 0-1 (81%). Induction regimen included BR (n=14), RCHOP (n=11), R-Hyper CVAD (n=14), RBAC(n=2) and RCHOP/RDHAP (n=18). 85% of patients were in CR and 15% in PR at time of transplant. All patients underwent chemo mobilization with a median time from diagnosis to transplant of 251 (119,1372) days. 30 patients (51%) received post-transplant rituximab maintenance. Patients were compared into 2 groups based on the use of high dose cytarabine in their induction regimen (table 1). Patients who received high dose cytarabine were younger and had a shorter time from diagnosis to transplant that patients who were treated without cytarabine. Survival endpoints for cytarabine based and no cytarabine based induction at 5 years post-transplant were as follows OS (82% vs 69%), DFS (65% vs 50%), Non-relapse mortality (4% vs 9%) and relapse (31% vs 41%) respectively ( figure 1). A multivariable cox analysis for OS, DFS, NRM and relapse showed that cytarabine had no effect on any of the endpoints. For OS, B symptoms and worse ECOG performance at Diagnosis (&gt;=2) were associated with worse OS. For relapse, higher MIPI score and no use of Rituxan maintenance resulted in higher relapse. In conclusion, our data shows that among MCL patients receiving ASCT, the use of more intensive cytarabine based induction does not clearly improve long-term outcomes It is possible that use of ASCT compensates for the use of a less intense induction regimen. Disease (MIPI), Patient (ECOG)characteristics and use of post-transplant maintenance are factors that contribute to post transplant outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Solh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Partner Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Safety and feasibility of outpatient high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Introduction The standard of care consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, which are traditionally given inpatient. At Moffitt Cancer Center, we have moved the administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine to the outpatient setting through the inpatient/outpatient program. To facilitate outpatient administration, high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine are given in a shorter interval of every 10 h instead of 12 h. The safety of a shorter duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of administering high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy in the inpatient/outpatient setting. Methods This is a retrospective chart review to analyze acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with inpatient/outpatient high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center from January 1, 2015, through November 1, 2018. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of hospitalization during the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. Results Two hundred fifty-three of 255 cycles of high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 118 patients. No patients receiving outpatient high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Our incidence of hospitalization (24%) after chemotherapy is consistent with the reported literature. Through the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine, 1265 inpatient days were saved with an approximate revenue of $3,135,176 generated in our study period. Conclusion Inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is both safe and feasible. Moving high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine administration to the outpatient setting resulted in significant additional revenue vs. inpatient administration.