Axillary node staging for microinvasive breast cancer: Is it justified?

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
J. M. Lyons ◽  
M. Stempel ◽  
K. J. Van Zee ◽  
H. S. Cody

7 Background: DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) is a lesion for which prognosis may be intermediate between that of DCIS and invasive breast cancer, but for which the role of axillary lymph node staging remains controversial. Here we report clinical characteristics and outcome in 112 patients with DCISM, with a particular focus on the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Methods: From our prospective database we retrospectively identified 112 patients with a diagnosis of DCISM who had undergone SLN biopsy between 1996 and 2004 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Median follow up was 6 years. Results: We found positive SLN in 12% (14/112) of all patients, macrometastases in 2.7% (3/112) and micrometastases in 10% (11/112). We performed axillary dissection (ALND) in all patients with macrometastases (3/3), finding additional positive nodes in 66% (2/3), and in 27% of those with micrometastases (3/11), finding no additional positive nodes. Among patients with negative SLN (38% of whom received systemic therapy), there were 5 loco-regional recurrences (1 in the ipsilateral axilla, and 4 in the ipsilateral breast, all DCIS) and 4 contralateral second primary breast cancers. Among patients with positive SLN (86% of whom received systemic adjuvant therapy), there were no loco-regional or distant recurrences. Conclusions: Positive SLN were present in 12% of our patients with DCISM, none of whom experienced recurrence at 6 years’ follow up. SLN biopsy may be justified for DCISM, but is clearly most beneficial to identify a very small subset of DCISM patients (2.7%, with SLN macrometastases) who could benefit from systemic adjuvant therapy. Our data imply that between 125 and 250 SLN biopsy procedures would be required to avoid breast cancer mortality in 1 patient, and do not support the routine use of ALND for SLN-positive patients. We recommend a critical reappraisal of routine SLN biopsy for DCISM.

Breast Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Niehoff ◽  
Silla Hey-Koch

Breast cancer treatment has undergone major changes in the last 20 years. Specifically, the role of axillary lymph node dissection has changed from radical axillary dissection with excision of a high number of lymph nodes to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This paradigm shift is associated with a controversial debate regarding the significance of axillary staging, the need for surgery, and the role of radiotherapy. Looking ahead, lymph node staging and axillary treatment might shift from SLNB and/or axillary dissection to ultrasound-guided needle biopsy and irradiation of regional lymph nodes in order to reduce treatment-related sequelae in early-stage breast cancer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 859-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jhii-Hyun Ahn ◽  
Eun Ju Son ◽  
Jeong-Ah Kim ◽  
Ji Hyun Youk ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
...  

Breast Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
pp. 157-167
Author(s):  
Flavio Crippa ◽  
Alberto Gerali ◽  
Alessandra Alessi ◽  
Roberto Agresti ◽  
Emilio Bombardieri

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Spanu ◽  
G Dettori ◽  
P Chiaramida ◽  
P Cottu ◽  
A Falchi ◽  
...  

Breast Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakuni Noguchi ◽  
Emi Morioka ◽  
Yukako Ohno ◽  
Miki Noguchi ◽  
Yasuharu Nakano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Enver Özkurt ◽  
Stephanie Wong ◽  
Esther Rhei ◽  
Mehra Golshan ◽  
Jane Brock ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (17) ◽  
pp. 2800-2808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Coutant ◽  
Camille Olivier ◽  
Eric Lambaudie ◽  
Eric Fondrinier ◽  
Fréderic Marchal ◽  
...  

Purpose Several models have been developed to predict nonsentinel lymph node (non-SN) status in patients with breast cancer with sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis. The purpose of our investigation was to compare available models in a prospective, multicenter study. Patients and Methods In a cohort of 561 positive-SN patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection, we evaluated the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), calibration, rates of false negatives (FN), and number of patients in the group at low risk for non-SN calculated from nine models. We also evaluated these parameters in the subgroup of patients with micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the SN. Results At least one non-SN was metastatic in 147 patients (26.2%). Only two of nine models had an AUC greater than 0.75. Three models were well calibrated. Two models yielded an FN rate less than 5%. Three models were able to assign more than a third of patients in the low-risk group. Overall, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram and Tenon score outperform other methods for all patients, including the subgroup of patients with only SN micrometastases or ITC. Conclusion Our study suggests that all models do not perform equally, especially for the subgroup of patients with only micrometastasis or ITC in the SN. We point out available evaluation methods to assess their performance and provide guidance for clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document