A dose-escalation phase I study of oral pan-CDK inhibitor BAY 1000394 in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation with an intermittent 28 days on/14 days off schedule.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3046-3046
Author(s):  
Juneko E. Grilley-Olson ◽  
Glen J. Weiss ◽  
Prabhu Rajagopalan ◽  
David Andrew Henderson ◽  
Martin Kornacker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Metastatic Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Oral Solution ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

3046 Background: BAY 1000394 (BAY) is an oral pan-CDK inhibitor targeting CDKs 1, 2, 4, 7, and 9 in the low nanomolar range. A phase I dose escalation multicenter study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: BAY was administered twice daily as an oral solution on a 28 days on / 14 days off schedule (cycle length 42 days, 3+3 design). PK was evaluated on cycle 1 day 1, 2, and 15. Response rate was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Results: Ten pts were treated at doses of 0.6 (4 pts) and 1.0 (6 pts) mg per day. Tumor types included 3 non-small cell lung, 2 colorectal, 2 melanoma and 3 others. CTCAEv4 grade 1/2 drug related adverse events (AEs) occurring in more than 3 patients were nausea (5 pts), hot flashes (4), vomiting, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and fatigue (3). The median interval between start of treatment and occurrence of hot flashes was 23 days. Drug-related grade 3 AEs were hyponatremia (2 pts) and edema, lymphopenia, myalgia, fatigue, and hypokalemia in 1 pt each. Hyponatremia in one and hypokalemia in another patient were dose limiting toxicities in cohort 2. Enrollment has been stopped. BAY PK was dose proportional and T1/2 was 13 hours; major metabolite levels were low. One pt with metastatic malignant melanoma pretreated with interferon, talimogene laherparepvec, and ipilimumab (best prior response: progressive disease) achieved stable disease (SD) lasting for 5 months. Three pts had SD lasting for 2.5 - 3 months (thyroid, colorectal, squamous esophageal). Conclusions: BAY administered for 28 days on / 14 days off demonstrated a limited tolerability. This is in contrast to the ongoing 3 days on / 4 days off trial which is currently at a dose level of 20 mg per day. Hot flashes were an infrequent AE in the other dosing schedule but occurred in 4 of the 10 pts presented here. The long interval between start of treatment and occurrence of hot flashes suggests that the 28 days of continuous treatment contributed to the lower tolerability observed in this trial. The 3 days on / 4 days off schedule will be used in the further clinical development of BAY.

A first-in-human phase I study of oral pan-CDK inhibitor BAY 1000394 in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation with an intermittent 3 days on/4 days off schedule.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3012-3012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rastislav Bahleda ◽  
Anas Gazzah ◽  
Andrea Varga ◽  
Prabhu Rajagopalan ◽  
David Andrew Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Oral Solution ◽  
Tablet Formulation ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antiemetic Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

3012 Background: BAY 1000394 (BAY) is an oral pan-CDK inhibitor targeting CDKs 1,2,4, 7 and 9 in the low nanomolar range. A phase I dose escalation study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: BAY was administered twice daily in a 3 days on / 4 days off schedule (cycle length 21 days, 3+3 design). PK was evaluated on cycle 1 day 1 and day 10. Response rate was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. PD markers included CK18 fragments in plasma. Results: As of Jan 08 2011, 34 pts were treated at doses of 0.6 (3 pts), 1.2 (4), 2.4 (3), 4.8 (3), 9.6 (3), 19.2 (6) mg per day as oral solution and at doses of 10 (4), 15 (6) and 20 (2) mg per day as tablet. Tumor types included 10 colorectal, 4 mesothelioma and 20 others. Cohort 9 (20 mg tablet) is ongoing. Frequent CTCAEv4 grade 1/2 drug related AEs occurring in more than 25% of patients up to cohort 8 were asthenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. DLTs (grade 3, 1 pt each) were hyponatremia, aphtous stomatitis at 19.2 mg solution and arterial thrombosis at 15 mg tablet. Aphthous stomatitis (20%) has not been observed with the tablet formulation. Other grade 3 related AEs were asthenia in 2 and nausea and vomiting in one pt each. Nausea and vomiting on treatment days were observed despite antiemetic treatment (aprepitant +/- setron). PK was dose proportional up to 9.6 mg, T1/2 was 10 hours, and relative bioavailability of tablet formulation was excellent; major metabolite levels were low (<10%). Levels of CK18 fragments did not correlate with dose or tumor response. Stable disease (SD) lasting for 2-4 months was observed in 9 patients, among others in 4 of 4 mesothelioma and 2 of 2 ovarian pts. One additional pt with cholangiocarcinoma has ongoing SD lasting for 5 months. One of the ovarian pts had a significant decline of CA125 lasting for 3 months. Conclusions: The tablet formulation of BAY 1000394 was better tolerated than oral solution. So far, doses up to a 15 mg per day with concomitant antiemetic treatment showed an acceptable tolerability. SD was observed in 10 of 25 heavily pretreated pts across cohorts 3 – 8.

A first-in-human phase I study of CZ48, a lactone ring protected oral camptothecin, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2578-2578
Author(s):  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Montaser F. Shaheen ◽  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Steven Weitman ◽  
Beppino C. Giovanella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

2578 Background: CZ48, the 20-O-propionate ester of camptothecin (CPT), is a prodrug of CPT first described by Cao et al. in 1998. The side-chain is enzymatically cleaved in tissues. This gives rise to CPT, a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Methods: An open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CZ48 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Initial dosing started qd po 80mg/m2, advancing to 2560mg/m2 for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. Dosing was restarted in cohorts of 3 patients tid po at 18mg/m2 and escalated to 1g/m2on a 5 days on, 2 days off schedule for 28 days. Patients were prescreened by measuring CPT levels in plasma following a single pilot dose of CZ48. Dose was doubled until occurrence of at least Grade 2 adverse event, at which time 3+3 patient cohorts with a dose escalation of 33%-100% were implemented. DLT in 2/6 patients defined the MTD as the preceding DLT dose. PK parameters were measured prior to dosing, days 1-5, and day 28 of Cycle 1. Results: Poor absorption led to initial qd dosing reaching 2560mg/m2 with no signs of DLT. Subsequent tid dosing showed improved plasma levels and arrival at DLT. 34 patients were treated across 8 dose levels from 18 to 1000 mg/m2. The most frequent study-related adverse effects were cystitis, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. Grade IV toxicities observed were febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary PK data in the qd dosing showed poor correlation between dose and Cmax or AUC, while PK in tid patients showed slightly improved correlation between dose and both CZ48 AUC (Pearson's correlation coefficient ϱ=0.476, p<0.01) and CZ48 Cmax(ϱ =0.51, p<0.01). Evidence of clinical activity with stable disease ≥ 6 months was observed in 2 heavily pre-treated colon and one breast cancer patient. Conclusions: The MTD of tid po CZ48 administered 5 days on, 2 days off of 28-day cycle is between 750 mg/m2 and 576 mg/m2. Overall toxicity is relatively mild, with DLT being cystitis and myelosuppression. Even with tid dosing, PK values correlate poorly to dose. A new formulation with 3-5 fold higher preclinical absorption values is being considered for introduction into the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT00947739.

Phase I study of BPM 31510 in advanced solid tumors: Updated analysis of a novel treatment with promising activity.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3015-3015
Author(s):  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
Victoria S Chua ◽  
Lita Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Grade 3

3015 Background: BPM 31510 is a novel small molecule that targets the metabolic machinery of the cancer microenvironment to reverse the aerobic glycolytic phenotype of cancer cells. Effector downstream signaling results in re-capitulation of BCL-2 mediated apoptosis and disruption in tumor vasculature by modulation of VEGF. (NR Narain et al., Proceedings of AACR Meeting Abstracts 2011). Methods: A standard 3+3 phase I, dose-escalation study design was used in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment. Primary objectives were establishment of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety/pharmacokinetic (PK) correlates. Secondary objectives included exploratory pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy (RECIST-1.1) of BPM 31510 in sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 pts. Results: At time of submission, 34 patients with advanced cancer who had failed multiple chemotherapeutic regimens had been enrolled in 7 dose cohorts (ranging from 5.6 mg/kg to 78.2 mg/kg). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (1-7). 2 patients have had grade 3 elevation in PT/INR, otherwise there have been no grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities to date. The pharmacokinetics of BPM 31510 are linear and there were no sex differences in the parameters normalized by dose and body surface area. Tmax and Cmax are associated with the end of the infusion. The values for t1/2 ranged from 2.18 to 13.3 hr, with little or no dependence of t1/2 on dose. Objective tumor responses have been noted at the dose of 58.6mg/kg with 1 partial response (myxoid liposarcoma) and 1 minor response (pleomorphic sarcoma). Six patients (19%) have had disease stabilization (> 4 months). Conclusions: Interim data from this phase I study indicate that BPM 31510 is well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities to date. A partial response and minor response were observed and correlates with dose escalation. Taken together, there is strong rationale for further clinical development of this compound as an anti-cancer agent.

A phase I study of Debio 0932, an oral HSP90 inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3026-3026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Yann Berge ◽  
Hein van Ingen ◽  
Silvano Brienza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

3026 Background: Debio 0932 is an oral second-generation heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor that has shown extended tumor retention, blood-brain-barrier penetration, and promising anti-tumor activity both as monotherapy and combination against a broad range of tumors in pre-clinical models. Here we report the results of the dose escalation part of a phase I study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma (NCT01168752). Methods: This was an open-label, non-randomized, 3 + 3 dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Debio 0932 when given QD or Q2D during the first 30 days of treatment in patients with advanced solid tumours or lymphoma resistant to standard therapy. The starting dose in both treatment groups was 50mg. Doses were increased according to an algorithm based on observed toxicity and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics and results are summarized below. DLTs occurred at 1600mg in both dose groups. Adverse events (AE) were mostly CTCAE grade 1 or 2, with no apparent dose relationship. No ocular or cardiac toxicity was observed. The main reason for treatment withdrawal was progressive disease. Investigator-reported cases of SD and PR were observed. Conclusions: Debio 0932 mono-therapy was generally well tolerated and showed promising signs of efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. The recommended phase II dose, established at 1000mg QD, will be tested in an additional 30 patients in an ongoing expansion study. A phase I-II study of Debio 0932 in combination with standard of care in the first- and second-line treatment of NSCLC is planned. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A Phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of navitoclax plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Puglisi ◽  
L Rhoda Molife ◽  
Maja JA de Jonge ◽  
Khurum H Khan ◽  
Leni van Doorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Optimal Schedule ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration

Aim: This Phase I study investigated safety of navitoclax and docetaxel in patients (n = 41) with advanced solid tumors. Patients & methods: Two navitoclax plus docetaxel dosing schedules (21 and 28 days) were evaluated. Maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities and preliminary antitumor activity were assessed. Results: Ten (24%) patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities; dose-escalation cohorts: n = 7 (21-day schedule: n = 5; 28-day schedule: n = 2) and 21-day expanded safety cohort: n = 3. Navitoclax 150-mg days 1–5 every 21 days with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1 was the maximum tolerated dose and optimal schedule. Adverse events included thrombocytopenia (63%), fatigue (61%), nausea (59%) and neutropenia (51%). Four confirmed partial responses occurred. Conclusion: Navitoclax 150-mg orally once/day was safely administered with docetaxel. Myelosuppression limited dose escalation; antitumor activity was observed. Clinical trial registration: NCT00888108 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

An open-label, phase I trial of BI 754091 alone and in combination with BI 754111 in Asian patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3054-3054
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatocellular Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

3054 Background: Dual blockade of immune checkpoint molecules, PD-1 and LAG-3, may enhance the anti-tumor response versus PD-1 blockade alone. This Phase I trial investigated BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754111, an anti-LAG-3 antibody, in Asian pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This trial comprised 3 parts. Parts 1 and 2 (dose escalation) were in pts with unresectable/metastatic solid tumors. In Part 1, pts received BI 754091 240 mg intravenously (iv), every 3 weeks (q3w); in Part 2, pts received BI 754091 240 mg in combination with BI 754111 (400 mg, 600 mg or 800 mg iv, q3w). Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model, with overdose control. The primary endpoint in Parts 1 and 2 was maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 754091 alone or in combination with BI 754111, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1. In Part 3, BI 754091 240 mg plus BI 754111 600 mg q3w was assessed in 4 expansion cohorts. Cohorts A–C included pts with: A) gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer; B) esophageal cancer; C) hepatocellular cancer; all had received ≥1 line of prior systemic therapy and no prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Cohort D included pts who had received prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy for the tumor types in Cohorts A–C. The primary endpoint in Part 3 was objective response (confirmed complete response or partial response [PR] per RECIST 1.1). Results: In Part 1, 6 pts received BI 754091 240 mg. In Part 2, 9 pts received BI 754091 240 mg plus BI 754111 (400 mg/600 mg/800 mg; n = 3 per cohort). No DLTs were reported in Parts 1 and 2. In Part 3, 121 pts were treated (97 [80%] male, median age 61 years [range 23–80]); Cohorts A/B/C/D included 33/33/20/35 pts. All-grade adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were experienced by 96 (79%) and 47 (39%) pts, respectively. The most commonly reported AEs (all/≥G3) were pyrexia (21%/0%), decreased appetite (17%/2%), anemia (11%/6%), and nausea (9%/0%). 36 (30%) pts reported immune-related AEs, most commonly hypothyroidism, in 7 (6%) pts. Confirmed PR was observed in 6 pts (5%; Cohort A/B, n = 4/2) and 35 (29%) pts had stable disease (Cohort A/B/C/D, n = 9/11/10/5). Conclusions: MTD was not reached for BI 754091 monotherapy or for BI 754091 in combination with BI 754111. The recommended dose for the combination was determined as BI 754091 240 mg plus BI 754111 600 mg q3w. Treatment was well tolerated and consistent with that observed in the global trial. Preliminary anti-tumor activity was seen. Clinical trial information: NCT03433898 .

A phase I, open label, multicenter dose escalation study of AZD2811 nanoparticle in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3098-3098
Author(s):  
Melissa Lynne Johnson ◽  
Jan G. C. E. Cosaert ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
Donald Strickland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Aurora Kinase B

3098 Background: Aurora kinase B (AURKB) represents a potential target for therapy in solid and hematological malignancies. AURKB inhibitor AZD1152 (barasertib) was previously investigated in solid tumor pts in a phase I setting. AZD2811-nanoparticle (np) is a novel, encapsulated slow release AURKB inhibitor offering several advantages over AZD1152 (Ashton S et al., Sci Transl Med 2016). We report the completed dose-escalation safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary activity and defined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AZD2811-np in pts with advanced solid tumors (NCT02579226). Methods: Adult pts with advanced solid tumors received AZD2811-np IV on Day 1 (D1) and 4 (D4) Q4 week (wk) in six cohorts 15-200 mg/infusion without the use of g-csf in cycle 1. D1 Q4wk and Q3wk schedules were investigated up to 600 mg/infusion (including cohorts with mandatory g-csf prophylaxis on day 8). A standard 3+3 design was used. PK was assessed in cycle 1. Results: 50 pts were recruited into 12 cohorts. D1, D4 Q4wk schedule: 24 pts (15, 25,38, 50, 100 mg/infusion (n=3/cohort), 200 mg/infusion (n=9)). All cohorts were tolerated. Transient grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 7/9 pts at 200 mg/infusion, including 1 DLT (gr4 > 7 days) D1 Q4wk: 200 mg(n=3) was tolerated. D1 Q3wk: 23 pts were evaluated (200/400 mg (n=3,7), and 400/600/500 mg with mandatory g-csf (n=3/5/6)). 400 mg without g-csf was not tolerated (1 gr3 mucosal inflammation & 1 gr4 neutropenia > 7 days). 600 mg with g-csf was not tolerated (gr3 febrile neutropenia & gr3 fatigue). 25/50 pts experienced AE ≥gr 3 (21 considered AZD2811-np-related, 19 neutropenia-related, no deaths within-DLT period). AZD2811-np caused transient gr1/2 fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea and mucosal inflammation. AZD2811 total blood PK appears dose proportional with a t1/2 of 30-50 hours irrespective of schedule. Released AZD2811 concentrations ~1% of total. 14 pts (28%) had disease stabilisation. 1 prostate ca. pt had a confirmed partial response (PR) (continued tx to 451 days). Conclusions: The MTD for AZD2811-np is 500 mg D1 Q3wk. AZD2811-np is now being investigated in a small cell lung cancer expansion. Clinical trial information: NCT02579226.

A phase I, dose escalation, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and food-effect study of α2 integrin inhibitor E7820 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Milojkovic Kerklaan ◽  
S. Slater ◽  
M. Flynn ◽  
A. Greystoke ◽  
P. O. Witteveen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Food Effect ◽  
Effect Study ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Integrin Inhibitor

A phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of vatalanib (PTK787/ZK 222584) in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Srikar Malireddy ◽  
Anne E. Younger ◽  
David R. Jones ◽  
Mary-Jane Waddell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

A phase I study of an IDO inhibitor (SHR9146) plus camrelizumab and in combination with/without apatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: Safety and efficacy analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3101-3101
Author(s):  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jinhua Xu ◽  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

3101 Background: IDO is an enzyme of interest in immuno-oncology because of the immunosuppressive effects that result from its role in tryptophan catabolism. Clinical trials of IDO inhibitors with immunotherapy are under active investigation. The addition of angiogenesis inhibitor may further enhance the anti-tumor immune responses. Here we report the safety and efficacy results of SHR9146 (IDO inhibitor) plus camrelizumab (PD-1 antibody) with/without apatinib (VEGFR-2 inhibitor) in patients (pts) with advanced solid cancers who failed standard antitumor therapies. Methods: This was an open-label, phase I study. Eligible puts would receive SHR9146 (escalated dose) plus camrelizumab (200 mg IV, q2w) alone (Cohort A) or in combination with apatinib (250 mg p.o. qd) (Cohort B). Each cohort was conducted according to a 3+3 dose escalation design. The starting dose of SHR9146 was 100mg bid, followed by 200, 400, 600 mg bid. The two primary endpoints were Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MDT). The secondary objective was to analysis the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and efficacy. Results: As of Oct 31, 2020, 23 pts have been enrolled (Cohort A:14, Cohort B: 9; median age: 54 years; median prior therapies: 2 lines;). Cohort A was escalating at 600mg, and Cohort B was escalating at 400mg. Two pts experienced DLTs: one DLT (G4 hypercalcemia) was observed at 600mg in Cohort A; the other DLT (G3 rash) was observed at 400mg in Cohort B. MDT was not reached and the study was still ongoing. In Cohort A, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 21.4% (3/14, all confirmed) and 42.9% (6/14). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with liver cancer (1/3), renal cancer (1/3), and cervix cancer (1/3). In Cohort B, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 33.3%(3/9, all confirmed) and 77.8%(7/9). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with SCLC (1/3), prostate cancer (1/3) and renal cancer (1/3). The incidence of pts with TRAEs and grade>=3 TRAEs were 91.3% (21/23) and 39.1% (9/23) respectively. The most common grade>=3 TRAEs were hypercalcemia (26.1%, 6/23), fatigue (17.4%, 4/23) and nausea (13.0%, 3/23). No fatal AEs were observed. G3 nausea, G3 lipase increased and G2 GGT increased resulted in SHR9146 dose reduction in 3 pts (Cohort A). Conclusions: SHR9146 plus camrelizumab in combination with/without apatinib demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with acceptable safety in pts with advanced solid tumors. Further study is needed to validate the efficacy and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03491631.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document