A first-in-human phase I study of oral pan-CDK inhibitor BAY 1000394 in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation with an intermittent 3 days on/4 days off schedule.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3012-3012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rastislav Bahleda ◽  
Anas Gazzah ◽  
Andrea Varga ◽  
Prabhu Rajagopalan ◽  
David Andrew Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Oral Solution ◽  
Tablet Formulation ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antiemetic Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

3012 Background: BAY 1000394 (BAY) is an oral pan-CDK inhibitor targeting CDKs 1,2,4, 7 and 9 in the low nanomolar range. A phase I dose escalation study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: BAY was administered twice daily in a 3 days on / 4 days off schedule (cycle length 21 days, 3+3 design). PK was evaluated on cycle 1 day 1 and day 10. Response rate was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. PD markers included CK18 fragments in plasma. Results: As of Jan 08 2011, 34 pts were treated at doses of 0.6 (3 pts), 1.2 (4), 2.4 (3), 4.8 (3), 9.6 (3), 19.2 (6) mg per day as oral solution and at doses of 10 (4), 15 (6) and 20 (2) mg per day as tablet. Tumor types included 10 colorectal, 4 mesothelioma and 20 others. Cohort 9 (20 mg tablet) is ongoing. Frequent CTCAEv4 grade 1/2 drug related AEs occurring in more than 25% of patients up to cohort 8 were asthenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. DLTs (grade 3, 1 pt each) were hyponatremia, aphtous stomatitis at 19.2 mg solution and arterial thrombosis at 15 mg tablet. Aphthous stomatitis (20%) has not been observed with the tablet formulation. Other grade 3 related AEs were asthenia in 2 and nausea and vomiting in one pt each. Nausea and vomiting on treatment days were observed despite antiemetic treatment (aprepitant +/- setron). PK was dose proportional up to 9.6 mg, T1/2 was 10 hours, and relative bioavailability of tablet formulation was excellent; major metabolite levels were low (<10%). Levels of CK18 fragments did not correlate with dose or tumor response. Stable disease (SD) lasting for 2-4 months was observed in 9 patients, among others in 4 of 4 mesothelioma and 2 of 2 ovarian pts. One additional pt with cholangiocarcinoma has ongoing SD lasting for 5 months. One of the ovarian pts had a significant decline of CA125 lasting for 3 months. Conclusions: The tablet formulation of BAY 1000394 was better tolerated than oral solution. So far, doses up to a 15 mg per day with concomitant antiemetic treatment showed an acceptable tolerability. SD was observed in 10 of 25 heavily pretreated pts across cohorts 3 – 8.

A dose-escalation phase I study of oral pan-CDK inhibitor BAY 1000394 in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation with an intermittent 28 days on/14 days off schedule.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3046-3046
Author(s):  
Juneko E. Grilley-Olson ◽  
Glen J. Weiss ◽  
Prabhu Rajagopalan ◽  
David Andrew Henderson ◽  
Martin Kornacker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Metastatic Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Oral Solution ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

3046 Background: BAY 1000394 (BAY) is an oral pan-CDK inhibitor targeting CDKs 1, 2, 4, 7, and 9 in the low nanomolar range. A phase I dose escalation multicenter study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: BAY was administered twice daily as an oral solution on a 28 days on / 14 days off schedule (cycle length 42 days, 3+3 design). PK was evaluated on cycle 1 day 1, 2, and 15. Response rate was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Results: Ten pts were treated at doses of 0.6 (4 pts) and 1.0 (6 pts) mg per day. Tumor types included 3 non-small cell lung, 2 colorectal, 2 melanoma and 3 others. CTCAEv4 grade 1/2 drug related adverse events (AEs) occurring in more than 3 patients were nausea (5 pts), hot flashes (4), vomiting, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and fatigue (3). The median interval between start of treatment and occurrence of hot flashes was 23 days. Drug-related grade 3 AEs were hyponatremia (2 pts) and edema, lymphopenia, myalgia, fatigue, and hypokalemia in 1 pt each. Hyponatremia in one and hypokalemia in another patient were dose limiting toxicities in cohort 2. Enrollment has been stopped. BAY PK was dose proportional and T1/2 was 13 hours; major metabolite levels were low. One pt with metastatic malignant melanoma pretreated with interferon, talimogene laherparepvec, and ipilimumab (best prior response: progressive disease) achieved stable disease (SD) lasting for 5 months. Three pts had SD lasting for 2.5 - 3 months (thyroid, colorectal, squamous esophageal). Conclusions: BAY administered for 28 days on / 14 days off demonstrated a limited tolerability. This is in contrast to the ongoing 3 days on / 4 days off trial which is currently at a dose level of 20 mg per day. Hot flashes were an infrequent AE in the other dosing schedule but occurred in 4 of the 10 pts presented here. The long interval between start of treatment and occurrence of hot flashes suggests that the 28 days of continuous treatment contributed to the lower tolerability observed in this trial. The 3 days on / 4 days off schedule will be used in the further clinical development of BAY.

Phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 490-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima A. Rangwala ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Mark Kozloff ◽  
Christy Arrowood ◽  
Jennifer Meadows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Rectovaginal Fistula ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

490 Background: Everolimus (E), an oral rapamycin analogue, is a potent mTOR inhibitor. Combined inhibition of VEGF and mTOR pathways may increase anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity. We evaluated E in combination with capecitabine (C), oxaliplatin (O), and bevacizumab (B) in a phase I dose escalation study. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had advanced solid tumors, adequate organ function and no increased risk for class-related toxicities. B and O were given intravenously; C and E were orally administered. Cycle length was 21 days. Doses for level 1: C 850 mg/m2 on days 1-14; O 130 mg/m2 on day one; B 7.5 mg/kg on day one; and E 5 mg three times a week. Doses for level -1: C 680 mg/m2, O100mg/m2. An intermediate dose level (-1b) of E escalated to 5 mg five times weekly was added to maximize dose intensity. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed in cycle 1. Concomitant administration of CYP3A4 substrates, inhibitors or inducers was prohibited. Results: Dose escalation is complete with 27 pts evaluable for toxicity and 24 evaluable for efficacy. Two DLTs (grade 2 intolerable fatigue, anorexia, vomiting and grade 3 diarrhea) were observed in 6 pts in cohort 1. No DLTs were observed in cohort -1; one DLT (rectovaginal fistula) was observed in the -1b cohort. Possible grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events any time on study (n=1 except as indicated) included diarrhea (n=2), intestinal perforation/fistula, rectovaginal fistula, hypertriglyceridemia (n=3), hyperglycemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia (n=2), lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension (n=3), deep vein thrombosis, and arterial thrombosis. Adverse events were consistent with known class-related toxicities. For efficacy, 10 pts had a partial response (PR); 10 had stable disease as best response. Of 13 pts with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), 5 had a PR. Of 8 pts with chemonaive mCRC, 5 had a PR. Conclusions: E in combination with full dose C, O and B was associated with unacceptable toxicity, primarily GI toxicity. E at 5mg five times weekly, C at 680 mg/m2 on days 1-14, O at 100 mg/m2 and B at 7.5 mg/kg on day one appears well tolerated. Activity was noted in chemorefractory and chemonaive mCRC patients.

Phase I study of BPM 31510 in advanced solid tumors: Updated analysis of a novel treatment with promising activity.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3015-3015
Author(s):  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
Victoria S Chua ◽  
Lita Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Grade 3

3015 Background: BPM 31510 is a novel small molecule that targets the metabolic machinery of the cancer microenvironment to reverse the aerobic glycolytic phenotype of cancer cells. Effector downstream signaling results in re-capitulation of BCL-2 mediated apoptosis and disruption in tumor vasculature by modulation of VEGF. (NR Narain et al., Proceedings of AACR Meeting Abstracts 2011). Methods: A standard 3+3 phase I, dose-escalation study design was used in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment. Primary objectives were establishment of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety/pharmacokinetic (PK) correlates. Secondary objectives included exploratory pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy (RECIST-1.1) of BPM 31510 in sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 pts. Results: At time of submission, 34 patients with advanced cancer who had failed multiple chemotherapeutic regimens had been enrolled in 7 dose cohorts (ranging from 5.6 mg/kg to 78.2 mg/kg). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (1-7). 2 patients have had grade 3 elevation in PT/INR, otherwise there have been no grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities to date. The pharmacokinetics of BPM 31510 are linear and there were no sex differences in the parameters normalized by dose and body surface area. Tmax and Cmax are associated with the end of the infusion. The values for t1/2 ranged from 2.18 to 13.3 hr, with little or no dependence of t1/2 on dose. Objective tumor responses have been noted at the dose of 58.6mg/kg with 1 partial response (myxoid liposarcoma) and 1 minor response (pleomorphic sarcoma). Six patients (19%) have had disease stabilization (> 4 months). Conclusions: Interim data from this phase I study indicate that BPM 31510 is well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities to date. A partial response and minor response were observed and correlates with dose escalation. Taken together, there is strong rationale for further clinical development of this compound as an anti-cancer agent.

Phase I dose-finding study of oral ERK1/2 inhibitor LTT462 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3640-3640
Author(s):  
Filip Janku ◽  
Elena Elez ◽  
Gopa Iyer ◽  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

3640 Background: LTT462 is an investigational small molecule inhibitor of ERK1/2, which has demonstrated preclinical activity in multiple MAPK activated cancer cells and xenograft models. This first-in-human study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LTT462 in advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations (NCT02711345). Methods: The dose-escalation part of this Phase I, open-label study, enrolled adult and adolescent pts with advanced solid tumors harboring ≥1 documented MAPK pathway alteration with progressive disease (PD) despite standard therapy, or for whom there is no effective standard treatment. Oral LTT462 was given once daily (QD) at 45–600 mg or twice daily (BID) at 150 mg or 200 mg. Objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) using a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model guided by escalation with overdose control, and characterize safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of LTT462. Results: Sixty-five pts (median age 60 years) including 1 pt aged 15 were enrolled in the dose-escalation; most pts (22%) had 3 prior therapies. Most common primary sites for cancer were in the colon (n = 21; 32%), ovary (n = 9; 14%), and pancreas (n = 7; 11%). All pts discontinued, the majority due to PD (n = 44; 68%). Eleven pts experienced DLTs; 6 pts experienced Grade 3 eye disorder DLTs (4 pts retinopathy, 2 pts chorioretinopathy). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported for 89% of pts, most commonly ( > 30%) diarrhea (n = 25; 38%) and nausea (n = 22; 34%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 29% of pts; most common was retinopathy (n = 4; 6%). MTD of LTT462 was 400 mg QD and 150 mg BID. Overall, 8 pts (12%) had stable disease (SD) and 35 pts (54%) had PD. An unconfirmed partial response was reported in a pt with cholangiocarcinoma with BRAF mutation; best change in sum of target lesions per RECIST 1.1 was -33.9%. LTT462 increased plasma peak drug concentration and drug exposure at increasing doses between 45–450 mg QD. Exposure at LTT462 600 mg QD was lower than anticipated, indicating potential saturation of absorption at this dose. LTT462 inhibited ERK1/2 and reduced DUSP6 expression relative to baseline in most pts evaluated. Conclusions: LTT462 is well tolerated. Limited clinical activity was reported with single agent LTT462; best overall response was SD. An ongoing study is investigating LTT462 in combination with the RAF inhibitor, LXH254, in NSCLC and melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02711345 .

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

A first-in-human phase I study of CYH33, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) α selective inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15645-e15645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Li Wei ◽  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Hongyun Zhao ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Ben-Yan Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Selective Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

e15645 Background: PI3Kα is the only subtype in PI3K family of which activated mutations occur frequently in tumors. CYH33 is a potent PI3Kα–selective inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in xenograft models. An open-label, Phase I dose-escalation & expansion study of CYH33 monotherapy (NCT03544905) is underway in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This study evaluates the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity of CYH33 administered daily orally in 28-day cycles until intolerable toxicity or disease progression (PD). Adult pts with advanced solid tumors who have progressed despite standard therapies are enrolled to this trial, and pts with or without PIK3CA mutant are eligible for dose-escalation and pts with PIK3CA mutant are eligible for dose-expansion. Results: As of the cut-off date 20 Dec 2019, 17 pts (median age 47.0 y) were enrolled in the first 6 dose levels (1mg, 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, 40mg and 60mg) of the dose-escalation cohorts, and 3 pts were enrolled in expansion cohort of 40 mg. Cohorts 1 mg to 20 mg were completed without dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), cohort 40mg was completed with 1 DLT (Grade 3 hyperglycemia) out of 6 evaluable pts, and 3 enrolled pts at 60 mg are still in the DLT evaluation. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (all grades, ≥ 20%) included hyperglycemia (17 pts, 85%), decreased appetite (5 pts, 25%), diarrhea (4 pts, 20%). Grade≥3 TRAEs were hyperglycemia (8 pts, 40%), nausea (1 pt, 5%) and decreased appetite (1 pt, 5%). Hyperglycemia was generally manageable with anti-hyperglycemic medications. The preliminary PK profile of CYH33 showed dose proportionality across the tested dose levels, half-life (t1/2) was about 20 hours with minimum accumulation, and the maximum concentration (Cmax) achieved 2-4 hours after dosing. Over all, among 15 tumor response evaluable pts, partial response (PR) was observed in 2 pts treated with 40mg (1 colorectal cancer with unknown PIK3CA mutation status, 1 breast cancer with PIK3CA mutant), and stable disease (SD) was observed in 3 pts with unknown PIK3CA mutation status. After the cut-off date, 1 more pt (ovarian cancer with PIK3CA mutation) treated with 40mg achieved PR, so that 2 out of 3 enrolled PIK3CA mutant pts treated with 40mg achieved PR. Conclusions: The first-in-human study of the PI3Kα selective inhibitor CYH33 demonstrated a manageable safety profile, linear PK, and encouraging preliminary anti-tumor activity. CYH33 single agent and in combination with other anti-tumor agents have be planned in future studies. Clinical trial information: 03544905.

A First-in-human Phase I Study of TAS0728, an Oral Covalent Binding Inhibitor of HER2, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With HER2 or HER3 Aberrations.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarina A Piha-Paul ◽  
Analía Azaro ◽  
Hendrik Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Matthew D Galsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Covalent Binding ◽  
Temporal Association ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract TAS0728 is an oral covalent binding inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). A first-in-human open-label, dose-escalation, phase I study (NCT03410927) was initiated to investigate the safety and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose of TAS0728 in adults with advanced solid tumors with HER2 or HER3 overexpression, amplification or mutation. In total, 19 patients received TAS0728 at escalating doses from 50 to 200 mg BID for 21-day cycles. Following escalation of the dose to 200 mg BID, a total of two DLTs were observed, both cases of Grade 3 diarrhea (lasting >48 hours and not responsive to aggressive antidiarrheal treatment). Following de-escalation of the dose to 150 mg BID, another DLT of Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in one patient. Additionally, at 150 mg BID, one patient had a fatal cardiac arrest after receiving 1 cycle (21 days) of TAS0728. The etiology of the cardiac arrest event was not clear, however causal relationship to TAS0728 could not be excluded due to the temporal association observed. Partial responses were observed in 2 of 14 patients evaluable for TAS0728 treatment response. The study was stopped due to unacceptable toxicity during the dose-escalation as the overall risk-benefit ratio no longer favored the dose level being tested, therefore the MTD was not determined. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03410927; registered on January 25, 2018.

A phase I study of ridaforolimus (MK-8669) in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10027-10027
Author(s):  
Andrew DJ Pearson ◽  
Sara Michele Federico ◽  
Isabelle Aerts ◽  
Darren R Hargrave ◽  
Steven G. DuBois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Childhood Malignancies ◽  
Phosphorylated Akt ◽  
Orally Bioavailable ◽  
Grade 3

10027 Background: Deregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway occurs in many poor prognosis childhood malignancies and inhibition of this pathway is a promising novel therapeutic strategy. Ridaforolimus (MK-8669) is a highly selective orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of mTOR. This multi-centre, phase I dose escalation study of orally administered Ridaforolimus was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety profile, pharmacokinetic profile (PK), antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers (phosphorylated Akt [pAkt] in platelet-rich plasma). Methods: Patients (pts) from 6 to <18 years (yrs) with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. Dose escalation was by a modified Toxicity Probability Intervals method (mTPI, Ji Y, et al. Clin Trials 2007) targeting a 30% dose limiting toxicity (DLT) ratio. Pts received 28 day cycles of Ridaforolimus (MK-8669), orally, five days out of seven. Dosing started at 22 mg/m2, escalated to 28 and 33 mg/m2, with an expansion cohort treated at the maximum administered dose. Results: 19 pts, age 8-17 (median 13.5 years), were enrolled and 18 treated from 6 international sites. Diagnoses included ependymoma (5), osteosarcoma (3), Ewings sarcoma (3) and other histologies (7). Four pts received dose level (DL) 1; 3 DL 2 and 11 DL 3. Pts received between 1-12+ courses. There was only one DLT (DL 2: grade 3 elevated alanine transaminase [ALT]) and no other grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities. Preliminary analysis shows the most frequent drug-related adverse events were manageable grade 1-2 stomatitis (70.6%) and fatigue (52%). Dose escalation stopped at DL3 (33 mg/m2, 150% of the adult recommended phase 2 dose [RP2D]). There were no objective responses by RECIST1.1. Two pts remain on study, with continuing stable disease (pineoblastoma [12 courses], diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma [6 courses]). PK and PD analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Ridaforolimus is a safe and well tolerated, orally bioavailable mTOR inhibitor. The RP2D for Ridaforolimus in children is 33 mg/m2. Prolonged disease stabilization was observed in two patients. PK/PD data will provide further data to support the RP2D. Further combination studies are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01431547.

A phase IB study of the combination of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) and cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced solid tumors with an expansion cohort in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 609-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuradha Krishnamurthy ◽  
A. Dasari ◽  
Albert C. Lockhart ◽  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Cyclosporin A ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Wnt Pathway ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

609 Background: Targeting MEK is of interest in the development of novel agents for treatment of many malignancies. However, better strategies are needed to overcome acquired resistance to MEK inhibitors. Preclinical studies have shown Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, Selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A (CsA), a non-canonical WnT pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We are conducting an NCI CTEP-approved Phase I/IB trial (NCI # 9571/COMIRB # 13-2628) of selumetinib and CsA combination. Biomarkers of response to therapy are being co-developed. We hypothesize that this combination will be safe and potentially effective in patients with mCRC and that upregulation of FZD2 may predict for sensitivity. Methods: Phase I trial with initial dose escalation investigating the combination of selumetinib and CsA in patients with advanced solid tumors (n = 18) followed by an expansion cohort in patients with irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC (n = 20). The expansion cohort utilizes a selumetinib “run-in” to evaluate efficacy in RAS-WT and RAS-MT mCRC to identify those patients most likely to respond to the combination. Results: 18 patients were enrolled in the dose escalation phase and 10 patients have been enrolled in the dose expansion phase as of September 2016. Grade 1 or 2 nausea and rash were reported as the most common AEs. Most commonly reported Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertension, elevated liver enzymes and rash. Three DLTs were reported with Grade 3 hypertension noted at dose level 1 and 2 and grade 3 rash reported at dose level 2. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as Selumetinib 75 mg BID and CsA 2 mg/kg BID on a 28-day cycle. Two partial responses and sixteen stable disease responses have been observed. Six patients have exhibited progressive disease. Conclusions: Selumetinib in combination with cyclosporin A appears to be well-tolerated with evidence of activity in solid tumors. Expansion cohort will complete enrollment this month. Clinical trial information: NCT02188264.

scholarly journals A first-in-human phase I study of TAS0728, an oral covalent binding inhibitor of HER2, in patients with advanced solid tumors with HER2 or HER3 aberrations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarina A. Piha-Paul ◽  
Analía Azaro ◽  
Hendrik Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Matthew D. Galsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Covalent Binding ◽  
Temporal Association ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Grade 3

SummaryTAS0728 is an oral covalent binding inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). A first-in-human open-label, dose-escalation, phase I study (NCT03410927) was initiated to investigate the safety and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose of TAS0728 in adults with advanced solid tumors with HER2 or HER3 overexpression, amplification or mutation. In total, 19 patients received TAS0728 at escalating doses from 50 to 200 mg BID for 21-day cycles. Following escalation of the dose to 200 mg BID, a total of two DLTs were observed, both cases of Grade 3 diarrhea (lasting >48 h and not responsive to aggressive antidiarrheal treatment). Following de-escalation of the dose to 150 mg BID, another DLT of Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in one patient. Additionally, at 150 mg BID, one patient had a fatal cardiac arrest after receiving 1 cycle (21 days) of TAS0728. The etiology of the cardiac arrest event was not clear, however causal relationship to TAS0728 could not be excluded due to the temporal association observed. Partial responses were observed in 2 of 14 patients evaluable for TAS0728 treatment response. The study was stopped due to unacceptable toxicity during the dose-escalation as the overall risk-benefit ratio no longer favored the dose level being tested, therefore the MTD was not determined. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03410927; registered on January 25, 2018.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document