Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: A prospective study of the outcome of 500 inguinal basins assessed in a single institution.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4640-4640
Author(s):  
Wayne Lam ◽  
Hussain M Alnajjar ◽  
Susannah La-Touche ◽  
Matthew Perry ◽  
Catherine M Corbishley ◽  
...  

4640 Background: Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) in combination with ultrasound scan (USS) has been the technique of choice at our centre since 2004 for the assessment of non palpable inguinal lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCp). Sensitivity/false-negative rates may vary depending on whether results are reported per patient or per node basin and with and without USS. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome of DSNB and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in our cohort of newly diagnosed patients and to analyse any variation in sensitivity of the procedure. Methods: A prospective cohort study over 6 years (2004 to 2010). Inclusion criteria: New diagnosis SCCp, T1G2 or greater definitive histology, non-palpable nodes in inguinal basin. Exclusion: patient with persistent/untreated local disease. Sensitivity of the procedure was calculated, per node basin, per patient, DSNB alone, USS/DSNB combined. Minimum follow up 12 months. Results: 500 inguinal basins in 264 patients underwent USS+/-FNAC and DSNB. 70 (14%) positive inguinal basins in 57(22%) patients were identified. 9 (2%) inguinal basins had no tracer uptake. 2 inguinal basins were confirmed false negative at 8 and 12 months. 2 inguinal basins had positive USS+FNAC and negative DSNB. Overall sensitivity of the technique is reported in the table. Conclusions: DSNB in combination with USS has excellent performance characteristics to stage patients with clinically node-negative penile cancer with a 3% false negative rate. USS improves performance by 4% over DSNB alone. There is no difference in performance of the combined technique if it is reported per node basin or per patient. [Table: see text]

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (20) ◽  
pp. 3325-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost A.P. Leijte ◽  
Ben Hughes ◽  
Niels M. Graafland ◽  
Bin K. Kroon ◽  
Renato A. Valdés Olmos ◽  
...  

Purpose Sentinel node biopsy is used to evaluate the nodal status of patients with clinically node-negative penile carcinoma. Its use is not widespread, and the majority of patients with clinically node-negative disease undergo an elective inguinal lymph node dissection. Reservations about the use of sentinel node biopsy include the fact that most current results come from one institution and the supposedly long learning curve associated with the procedure. The purpose of this study was to address these issues by analyzing results from two centers and by evaluating the learning curve. Patients and Methods All patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy for penile carcinoma at two centers were included. The sentinel node identification rate, false-negative rate, and morbidity of the procedure were calculated. Results from the first 30 procedures were assessed for a potential learning curve. Results A total of 323 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma, which included 611 clinically node-negative groins, were scheduled for sentinel node biopsy. A sentinel node was found in 572 of the 592 groins (97%) that proceeded to sentinel node biopsy. In 79 groins, a sentinel node was positive for tumor. Six inguinal node recurrences occurred after a negative sentinel node procedure, all within 15 months after sentinel node biopsy. The combined false-negative rate was 7%. Complications occurred in 4.7% of explored groins. None of the false-negative procedures occurred in the initial 30 procedures. Conclusion Sentinel node biopsy is a suitable procedure to stage clinically node-negative penile cancer, and it has a low complication rate. No learning curve was demonstrated in this study.


2012 ◽  
Vol 106 (7) ◽  
pp. 816-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie S. Vorburger ◽  
Martina A. Broglie ◽  
Alex Soltermann ◽  
Stephan K. Haerle ◽  
Sarah R. Haile ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1020-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Ferris ◽  
Patrick Stefanika ◽  
Liqiang Xi ◽  
William Gooding ◽  
Raja R. Seethala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document