A phase I/II trial of erlotinib S-1 therapy in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma: Thoracic Oncology Reseach Group (TORG) 0808/0913.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18099-e18099
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Nogami ◽  
Tetsu Shinkai ◽  
Toshiyuki Kozuki ◽  
Atsuko Ogino ◽  
Yuka Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Basic Studies

e18099 Background: Gefitinib has been shown in basic studies to reduce the expression of thymidilate synthase, the target enzyme for the 5-FU-based chemotherapy, at the protein and mRNA levels, and synergistic effects of gefitinib used in combination with S-1 have been reported. Erlotinib also reduced TS expression and activity. The present studies were designed as study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of erlotinib/ S-1 combination therapy as a 2nd/3rd-line therapy for recurrent/advanced NSCLC. Methods: Chemotherapy consisted of two 3-week cycles of erlotinib and S-1 treatment. Erlotinib was orally administered once daily at a dose of 150 mg/body, and patients received an oral dose of S-1 twice daily after meals from days 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. In phase I trial(TORG0808), the primary endpoint was to evaluate the DLT and the MTD for the following phase II study, and the secondary endpoint was to evaluate the antitumor activity and safety. Based on the phase I trial, we conducted a phase II trial (TORG0913) of this combination with pretreated EGFR negative NSCLC to determine the ORR. The secondary endpoints were PFS, disease control rate, OS, and safety. Results: 7 patients with good PS (0 or 1) and 10 patients with PS 0-2 participated in phase I and phase II trial. In phase I trial, the recommended doses for the phase II study were determined to be 150mg/body and 80mg/m2. The ORR was 67%, and 3/4 responders are EGFR positive patients. In phase II trial, the ORR was very low (only one patient).Myelosuppression was relatively mild, but Grade 3 or worse non-hematological toxicities including diarrhea, mucositis, and dermatitis were observed in 6 patients, which resulted in two treatment-related deaths. Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended the early termination, and the clinical trial was terminated due to adverse events. Conclusions: Phase I study showed the favorable efficacy and moderate safety profiles of this combination especially in EGFR positive patients, but less effective and too toxic in EGFR negative patients in phase II trial.

Phase I study of obatoclax mesylate (GX15–070MS), a bcl-2 antagonist, plus topotecan in relapsed small cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3504-3504
Author(s):  
A. B. Brown ◽  
C. Rudin ◽  
N. Rizvi ◽  
W. Travis ◽  
N. Takebe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

3504 Background: Bcl-2 is a rational target in SCLC since it is overexpressed in 60%-90% of tumors and may play a role in resistance of SCLC to chemotherapy. Obatoclax is a small molecule BH3 mimetic that blocks bcl-2 binding to proapoptotic family members. Obatoclax has growth inhibitory effects in several solid tumor cell lines and xenografts, with at least additive effects in combination with topotecan. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of obatoclax plus topotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC and other solid tumors. Methods: We conducted a phase I dose escalation study using a standard “3+3” design. Obatoclax was administered at 14 or 20 mg/m2 over 3 hours on day 1 every 21 days. A subsequent cohort received obatoclax 14mg/m2 on days 1 and 3. Topotecan was given at 1.25 mg/m2 days 1–5. All patients received pegfilgrastim on day 8. Eligible patients were adults with solid tumors appropriate for treatment with topotecan. Patients with neurologically stable, treated brain mets were eligible. Results: 14 patients have been treated including 8 SCLC, 3 extrapulmonary small cell, 1 carcinoid, 1 Merkel cell and 1 melanoma previously treated with 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy. Nearly all patients experienced neurologic toxicities during the obatoclax infusion which included ataxia, dysarthria, somnolence and/or mood alteration; these typically resolved 1–2 hours after completion of the infusion. The MTD of obatoclax was 20 mg/m2 on day 1 with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) including grade 3 neurotoxicity (2 pts) and febrile neutropenia. Hematologic toxicity included grade 3/4 anemia (6 pts), thrombocytopenia (5 pts) and neutropenia (5 pts). Other toxicities included mild nausea/vomiting, fatigue, pruritus, and constipation. Clinical activity was seen in patients with SCLC including 1 PR and 4 SD out of 7 evaluable. The median TTP for these SCLC patients was 11 weeks. Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose is obatoclax 14 mg/m2 on days 1 and 3 with topotecan 1.25 mg/m2 on days 1–5 in 21 day cycles. A phase II study in second-line SCLC is open. Supported by NCI U01-CA69856. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of SIR-sphere plus sorafenib as first-line treatment in patients with nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: The Asia-Pacific Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials Group protocol 05 (AHCC05)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15538-e15538 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Chow ◽  
D. Poon ◽  
S. Choo ◽  
H. Lai ◽  
A. Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Tumour Regression ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy ◽  
Radio Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

e15538 Background: Sorafenib has been shown to significantly prolong survival in patients with nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without however significant tumour regression. The addition of radio-ablative therapy could confer additional survival benefit. This phase I trial was carried out to ascertain the toxicities and safety of this combination and was designed as a prelude to a phase II trial. Methods: Eligible patients were administered SIR-sphere (max dose 3 GBq) and subsequently given Sorafenib therapy (400mg bd) either 14 days (Cohort 1: first 3 patients) or 11 days (Cohort 2: subsequent patients) later. Assessment was carried out for 30 days after commencement of Sorafenib. Results: 10 patients were recruited into this phase I trial. The second patient became ineligible for sorafenib therapy after SIR-sphere due to pulmonary bleeding not related to radio-therapy and was excluded from assessment. The characteristics of the patients are in the Table. At the end of the study period, there was no adverse events (AE) of grade 3 or 4 for Cohort 1 and 3 for Cohort 2. The only serious adverse event (SAE) recorded was from Cohort 2. Conclusions: Starting sorafenib 14 days after SIR-sphere therapy is associated fewer AEs and SAEs. The phase II trial has commenced withsorafenib starting 14 days after SIR-sphere. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document