Adolescents and young adults versus adults’ patients with large B-cell lymphoma: A matched-control analysis on 55 patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18526-e18526
Author(s):  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Diane Coso ◽  
Benjamin Esterni ◽  
Norbert Vey ◽  
Bruno Chetaille ◽  
...  

e18526 Background: Among non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) accounts for 60% in adolescents and young adults (AYA). There are no so many reports in the literature on LBCL in AYA patients. Moreover, there are no data available to suggest whether AYA patients with LBCL would benefit more from pediatric-chemotherapy regimen or from adult rituximab-chemotherapy treatment. In order to clarify this point, we conducted a matched-control analysis comparing AYA patients and adult’s patients with LBCL. Methods: We performed a clinical and pathological review of LBCL cases referred to our institution over a 15-year period from 1996 to 2010. Fifty-five AYA (16-30 years) were fully matched to 165 adult’s patients aged between 31 years and 65 years (ratio 1/3) for each of the following factors: international prognostic index (IPI), chemotherapy regimen, and rituximab delivery. Results: When compared to LBCL adults’ patients, pathological features in AYA showed a high incidence of primary mediastinal thymic LBCL subtype (33% vs. 5%, P= 0, 0001), while histological transformation was rare (2% vs. 14%, P= 0, 01). LBCL in AYA also presented with a bulky mediastinal mass (51% vs. 21%, P= 0, 0001), gastrointestinal tract involvement was less frequent (2% vs. 13%, P=0, 03), and LDH value was significantly higher (73% vs. 54%, P= 0, 01). The complete response rate to chemotherapy combination regimen was at 82% in AYA, with no difference with that observed in adult patients (82%, P=0, 8). With a median follow-up of 80 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of AYA patients were at 73% ± 12% and 68% ± 12%, respectively. The matched-control analysis showed no difference either for OS (P = 0.8) or EFS (P = 0.9). Conclusions: LBCL in AYA should be considered as a true clinical and pathological entity. However, age does not confer a prognostic value different from that observed in LBCL in patients older than 30 years.

Hematology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
pp. 297-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Sandlund

Abstract The SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) data for the years 1975–1998 show that children with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have a better treatment outcome than do adults. Many factors may contribute to this age-related difference. Some factors are related to the patient (e.g., drug distribution and clearance, performance status, compliance, sex) whereas others pertain to tumor histology and biology. The spectrum of NHL subtypes is well known to differ in children and adults. From ages 5 through 14 years, Burkitt lymphoma is the predominant histologic subtype, whereas diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is most common in the 15- to 29-year age range. Because different treatment strategies are often used in children and adults with NHL, the choice of therapy for adolescents and young adults (ages 15 through 29 years) is challenging and somewhat controversial. It is reasonable to consider pediatric strategies for some adolescents and very young adults with NHL, and pediatric strategies are currently used to treat adults with certain subtypes of NHL (Burkitt lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma). However, the use of pediatric strategies in adults does not guarantee a comparable outcome, as illustrated by trials for adult lymphoblastic lymphoma. There is clearly a need for further biologic study of NHL in children, adolescents, and young adults. Age-related differences in tumor biology have been demonstrated in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Additional biologic data will not only improve prognosis and treatment stratification but, more important, will lead to the identification of specific molecular targets for therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Takahiro Yano ◽  
Youko Suehiro ◽  
Hiromi Iwasaki ◽  
Michihiro Hidaka ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 548-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Y. Hong ◽  
D.H. Yoon ◽  
C. Suh ◽  
J. Huh ◽  
I.-G. Do ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5338-5338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changju Qu ◽  
Nana Ping ◽  
Danqing Kong ◽  
Fan Xia ◽  
Depei Wu ◽  
...  

Background: Chemo-resistance is a core challenge in successful treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). It has been previously reported that DNA hypermethylation and histone deacetylation are two major epigenetic modifications contributing to chemo-resistance in multiple tumors. Moreover, combination of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDI) and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTI) resulted in synergistic anti-lymphoma effect toward refractory and/or relapsed (R/R) DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo xenografts. R-GemOx (rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin), as a first-line chemotherapy regimen for elderly primary DLBCL patients or a salvage chemotherapy regimen for R/R DLBCL patients not candidates for high-dose therapy, has shown high activity with a relative low toxicity profile. Herein, we therefore aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of the dual epigenetic agents plus R-GemOx regimen (CD-R-GemOx) as a salvage treatment in R/R DLBCL patients. Methods: 13 R/R DLBCL patients including 8 males and 5 females, diagnosed with R/R DLBCL on the basis of the 2008 World Health Organization guidelines, who had failed from previous salvage treatment were exposed to dual epigenetic agents (Chidamide 30mg biw and Decitabine 10mg/m2 qd d1-d5) and sequential R-GemOx(rituximab 375 mg/m² qd d6; gemcitabine 1 g/m² d7,d14; and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² d8) for salvage chemotherapy. Median age of these patients was 56 (35-67) years old. Most (10/13) patients have advanced Ann Arbor stages. The cycle was repeated every 4 weeks. Clinical efficacy were assessed after two cycles. Results: All thirteen (100%) patients achieved disease control response. Ten (76.9%) patients achieved an overall response at the end of the treatment, with three (23.1%) achieving a complete response. Common grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological toxicities (thrombocytopenia in ten [76.9%] patients, anaemia in six [46.2%], and neutropenia in twelve [92.3%]) and gastrointestinal complications (nausea in four [30.8%] patients, vomiting in one [7.7%], diarrhoea in six [46.2%] and mucositis in six [46.2%]). Besides, 6/13 (46.2%) cases manifested with pyrexia; 3/13(23.8%) cases manifested with increase of ALT and hyperbilirubinemia. All above toxicities were reversible and recovered within 1 month after chemotherapy. No neurological toxicities and treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: Our study indicates that combination of dual epigenetic agents and R-GemOx is a safe and promising salvage approach to managing R/R DLBCL patients and may serve as an optimal salvage treatment for bridging autologous transplantation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Rimsza ◽  
Pedro Farinha ◽  
Deborah A. Fuchs ◽  
Hamid Masoudi ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document