Standardizing quality breast cancer care throughout all New York university facilities.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 160-160
Author(s):  
Anna C. Pavlick ◽  
Freya Ruth Schnabel ◽  
Amy Tiersten ◽  
Matthew Volm ◽  
Jennifer J. Wu ◽  
...  

160 Background: NYU physicians provide breast cancer care (BCC) at several locations throughout New York. The NYU Clinical Cancer Center (NYUCCC) is a private, university-based facility while Bellevue and Woodhull Hospitals are city hospitals. The diversity of BCC provided to patients (pts) in city hospitals can vary greatly from that of private centers and intra-center physician variability also diversifies care. This variability can impact on pt satisfaction and outcomes. Breast cancer (Br Ca) pts make up the greatest number of pts seen and treated at all NYU affiliated sites, therefore, a "Br Ca Quality of Care Program" will be incorporated into the electronic medical record (EMR) at all facilities. A treatment algorithm based on the pt’s stage and a simple "drop-down menus" will simplify use. It will encompass diagnostic imaging, pathology, biopsy procedures, surgery, radiation, chemo, and hormonal therapy as well as survivorship guidelines for maintaining wellness. Methods: Leaders of each Br Ca program have identified potential barriers to care and rectifiable issues. Algorithms and “drop down menus” in the EMR will be presented to the NYUCCC Br Ca physicians for feedback. This tool will then be refined and launched at NYUCCC. After evaluating this program at NYUCCC, the data will be presented to the all NYUCCC faculty. Achieving the city hospitals to adopt this EMR program will be the ultimate success and standardized quality care will be the result. Results: An assessment of the endpoints of physician adherence to guidelines, cost effectiveness and pt/provider satisfaction will be conducted 6 months later. Random audits of breast cancer pt charts will evaluate provider compliance. A cost analysis of this care will be done and compared to a random sampling of previously treated pt charts. Review and analysis of this data would be presented to the NYUCCC faculty, then programs launched at both city-hospitals. Conclusions: If the endpoints of quality standardized care, cost effectiveness and pt/provider satisfaction are met, incorporation of similar programs into other high volume oncologic disease entities seen at all NYU facilities would be developed.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16566-e16566 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Higashi ◽  
F. Nakamura ◽  
H. Mukai ◽  
T. Sobue ◽  
E. Mekata ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikmat Abdel-Razeq ◽  
Asem Mansour ◽  
Dima Jaddan

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in Jordan and the third leading cause of cancer death after lung and colorectal cancers. Although the incidence of breast cancer in Jordan is lower than that in industrialized nations, the number of new cases has been significantly increasing, and women present with breast cancer at a younger age and with more advanced disease than women in Western countries. Jordan is a medium-income country with limited resources and a young population structure. Therefore, breast cancer poses a particularly challenging burden on the country’s health care system. Despite ongoing endeavors to improve breast cancer care at both public and private levels, more work is needed to achieve downstaging of the disease and improve access, awareness, and participation in early detection. Multimodality treatment facilities and supportive care are available; however, the quality of care varies widely according to where the patient is treated, and most treatment facilities remain located centrally, thus, creating access difficulties. The King Hussein Cancer Center, the only comprehensive cancer center in Jordan, has changed the practice of oncology in the country via implementation of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment, monitoring of treatment outcomes, and investments in ongoing cancer research. However, there remains no national system for ensuring provision of high-quality cancer care nationwide. Here, we review the epidemiology of breast cancer and the current status of breast cancer care in Jordan, we compare our treatment outcomes with international ones, and we highlight challenges and improvement opportunities.


Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 420-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Hassett ◽  
Maria J. Schymura ◽  
Kun Chen ◽  
Francis P. Boscoe ◽  
Foster C. Gesten ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 207 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Baliski ◽  
Colleen E. McGahan ◽  
Caitlyn M. Liberto ◽  
Sandra Broughton ◽  
Susan Ellard ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S-5-S-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Bunnell ◽  
Katya Losk ◽  
Sarah Kadish ◽  
Nancy Lin ◽  
Judith Hirshfield-Bartek ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 107-107
Author(s):  
Rashmi Krishna Murthy ◽  
Susan E Ferguson ◽  
Welela Tereffe ◽  
Isabelle Bedrosian ◽  
Stacy L. Moulder

107 Background: The multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer care provides a coordinated mechanism for evaluating and treating new patients. Improving the structure of clinic models may further enhance the delivery of cancer care. Methods: In May 2013, multi-team (MT) clinics were introduced in the breast center at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Local patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were scheduled to be seen in a MT clinic with testing coordinated for the same day. Patient cases were first reviewed and examined concurrently by physicians from each discipline (surgical, medical, radiation), followed by sequential visits with each clinician for a more detailed discussion. The goal of this program was to determine whether a highly integrated multidisciplinary clinic model would improve the efficient delivery of cancer treatment. Results: From 5/2013 – 5/2014, 211 newly diagnosed and untreated breast cancer patients were seen in the MT clinic. Clinical metrics were reviewed retrospectively and compared to newly diagnosed and untreated patients who entered the clinic using the standard model (non-MT patients) (n=1944). Please see Table for details of the data. Conclusions: Multi-team clinics improved clinical metrics leading to efficiency and timeliness of access. The model enriched for a population of patients who were more likely to receive treatment within the breast center, utilize institutional resources, and enroll into clinical trials. [Table: see text]


Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (14) ◽  
pp. 2524-2531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohua Basu ◽  
Jared Linebarger ◽  
Sheryl G. A. Gabram ◽  
Sharla Gayle Patterson ◽  
Miral Amin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document