A QTc study of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 257-257
Author(s):  
James Lloyd Wade ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
Frederick E. Millard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

257 Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) improves overall survival in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure, compared with mitoxantrone (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59–0.83; P < 0.0001). Following Cbz approval for the treatment of mCRPC, this study was undertaken to evaluate any effect of Cbz on the QTc interval. Methods: This prospective, multinational, open-label study ( NCT01087021 ) enrolled pts with advanced solid tumors (without other therapeutic options). Cbz 25 mg/m² IV was administered on Day 1 Q3W. QTc and other ECG intervals were assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Triplicate ECGs were obtained from 12-lead Holter recordings and concomitant serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the corrected QTc interval (according to the Fridericia formula QTcF). Results: A total of 96 pts were enrolled; 32 pts under the original protocol (6-h Holter) and 64 pts following protocol amendment 1, which extended ECG and PK monitoring (24-h Holter). Median age was 63 yrs (69.8% male), 30.5% and 57.9% of pts were ECOG PS 0 and 1 respectively; 33 pts (34.4%) had prostate cancer. Screening ECG was abnormal but not clinically significant in 39.6% of pts. The majority (n = 65) of pts received ≥ 3 treatment cycles; safety and ECG parameters were evaluated in 95 and 94 pts, respectively. In the 24-h Holter group (n = 63), the maximum least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in QTcF was 4.8 msec (90% CI 2.1–7.5), returning to baseline by 24 h. Similar results were observed in the overall population (n = 94). At Cmax, Cbz concentration had no effect on QTcF change from baseline; the mean (CV%) Cmax (n = 91) and AUC (n = 92) were 276 ng/ml (63%) and 1245 ng.h/ml (82%). The LS mean change from baseline in heart rate increased up to 24 h but remained < 10 beats per minute. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (27.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.6%), fatigue (12.6%) and dehydration (5.3%). No Grade 3/4 cardiac AEs were reported. Of the 6 deaths reported, 1 (infection) was study drug related. Conclusions: Cbz had no significant effect on QTc interval in pts with advanced tumors. The Cbz safety profile is consistent with previous findings and with other taxane-based therapies.

A QTc study of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15115-e15115
Author(s):  
James Lloyd Wade ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
Frederick E. Millard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Interval Methods ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

e15115 Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) improves overall survival in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure, compared with mitoxantrone (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59–0.83; p<0.0001). Following Cbz approval for the treatment of mCRPC, this study was undertaken to evaluate any effect of Cbz on the QTc interval. Methods: This prospective, multinational, open-label study (NCT01087021) enrolled pts with advanced solid tumors (without other therapeutic options). Cbz 25 mg/m² IV was administered on Day 1 Q3W. QTc and other ECG intervals were assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Triplicate ECGs were obtained from 12-lead Holter recordings and concomitant serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the corrected QTc interval (according to the Fridericia formula [QTcF]). Results: A total of 96 pts were enrolled; 32 pts under the original protocol (6-h Holter) and 64 pts following protocol amendment 1, which extended ECG and PK monitoring (24-h Holter). Median age was 63 yrs (69.8% male), 30.5% and 57.9% of pts were ECOG PS 0 and 1 respectively; 33 pts (34.4%) had prostate cancer. Screening ECG was abnormal but not clinically significant in 39.6% of pts. The majority (n=65) of pts received ≥ 3 treatment cycles; safety and ECG parameters were evaluated in 95 and 94 pts, respectively. In the 24-h Holter group (n=63), the maximum least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in QTcF was 4.8 msec (90% CI 2.1–7.5), returning to baseline by 24 h. Similar results were observed in the overall population (n=94). At Cmax, Cbz concentration had no effect on QTcF change from baseline; the mean (CV%) Cmax (n=91) and AUC (n=92) were 276 ng/ml (63%) and 1245 ng.h/ml (82%). The LS mean change from baseline in heart rate increased up to 24 h but remained < 10 beats per minute. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (27.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.6%), fatigue (12.6%) and dehydration (5.3%). No grade 3/4 cardiac AEs were reported. Of the 6 deaths reported, 1 (infection) was study drug related. Conclusions: Cbz had no significant effect on QTc interval in pts with advanced tumors. The Cbz safety profile is consistent with previous findings and with other taxane-based therapies.

Comparison of two doses of cabazitaxel plus prednisone in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with a docetaxel (D)-containing regimen.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4692-TPS4692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario A. Eisenberger ◽  
Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard ◽  
Loic Mourey ◽  
Paul N. Mainwaring ◽  
Daniel Ford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

TPS4692^ Background: The phase III TROPIC study (NCT00417079) reported a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for cabazitaxel (Cbz) + prednisone (P;CbzP) (25 mg/m2 IV Q3W/10 mg PO QD) vs mitoxantrone (M) + P (MP) (median OS 15.1 vs 12.7 mos; HR 0.70; P < 0.0001) in pts with mCRPC (also known as hormone-refractory prostate cancer) previously treated with a D-containing regimen. CbzP is approved by the FDA, EMA and other health authorities for the treatment of pts with mCRPC that has progressed after a D-containing regimen. Cbz toxicity is consistent with other taxanes; compared with M, more hematologic toxicities are reported (primarily Grade 3–4 neutropenia). Phase I/II studies identified 20 and 25 mg/m2 as recommended doses; 25 mg/m2 was selected for the phase III TROPIC study. As pooled data show Grade 3–4 neutropenia incidence is lower with Cbz < 25 mg/m2 (61%) vs ≥ 25 mg/m2 (74%), it is of interest to assess if reducing the Cbz approved dose in mCRPC lessens hematologic toxicity and is non-inferior in terms of efficacy. Methods: PROSELICA (NCT01308580) is a randomized, open-label, multinational, phase III study comparing 20 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2 Cbz for efficacy and tolerability. Pts with a life expectancy > 6 mos, ECOG PS ≤ 2, histologically/cytologically confirmed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma resistant to hormone therapy and previously treated with a D-containing regimen are eligible. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive Cbz 20 mg/m² or 25 mg/m² IV Q3W + P 10 mg PO QD, treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent (max 10 cycles), and stratified according to ECOG PS, measurable disease (yes/no) and region. The primary endpoint is OS (non-inferiority design). Secondary endpoints include safety, progression-free survival (PCWG2 criteria), PSA and pain progression and response, tumor response in pts with measurable disease and health-related quality of life. Cbz PK and pharmacogenomics will be assessed in pt subgroups. Planned enrollment is 1,200 pts. Study start was in May 2011; as of Jan 2012, 270 pts had been enrolled. The first DMC meeting recommended continuing the study without change.

Phase I trial of the investigational aurora A kinase (AAK) inhibitor MLN8237 (alisertib) in combination with docetaxel (DTX) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, including castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 217-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Noah M. Hahn ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
E. Jane Leonard ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Aurora A Kinase ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

217 Background: Overexpression of AAK, a key regulator of mitosis, is seen in various solid tumors, including prostate cancer. This open-label, Phase 1 trial investigated the safety/tolerability of MLN8237, an oral selective AAK inhibitor, combined with DTX in pts with advanced solid tumors, including CRPC. Methods: Previously treated pts aged ≥18 y who were candidates for DTX received 21-day cycles of MLN8237 10–50 mg BID on days 1–7, escalated in 3+3 dosing cohorts, plus DTX 60 or 75 mg/m2 on day 1. To manage toxicity, a 5-day MLN8237 regimen was later evaluated with DTX 60 or 75 mg/m2+ G-CSF support. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability and recommended phase II dose/schedule (RP2D). Pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity (RECIST 1.1/PSA) were also assessed. Results: 35 pts (median age 63 y [25–87]; 71% male; 17 CRPC) recruited into 8 cohorts received a median of 3 (1–33) cycles; 15 pts (11 CRPC) had ≥6 cycles. 14 DLTs were seen in 11 pts (5 CRPC) in Cycle 1: G4 neutropenia >7 days (n=3), G3/4 febrile neutropenia (FN; n=7), G3 stomatitis (n=3), and G3 urinary tract infection (n=1). The RP2D was MLN8237 20 mg BID on Days 1–7 + DTX 75 mg/m2 in 21-day cycles without G-CSF. Common G≥3 drug-related AEs included neutropenia (86%), leukopenia (31%), FN (23%) and stomatitis (14%). 20 (57%) pts reported SAEs, most commonly FN (n=8). 2 pts withdrew due to AEs, inc. 1 death (G3 FN; G3 mucositis); 4 pts continue on study. On-study deaths (n=2; disease progression) were not considered drug-related. Steady-state MLN8237 exposure (AUCss) increased approximately dose-proportionally over 10–30 mg BID when combined with DTX (n=16). Analysis of the effect of MLN8237 on DTX PK at RP2D is ongoing. Among 11 evaluable CRPC pts, 6 had PR (4 had PSA50) and 6 had SD (4 with PSA50). 2 other pts (bladder cancer and angiosarcoma) also had PR. Conclusions: The RP2D was MLN8237 20 mg BID on days 1–7 + DTX 75 mg/m2 on day 1. Despite myelosuppression, the combination of MLN8237 and DTX had a generally manageable toxicity profile in pts with advanced solid tumors. Further clinical study of this combination, particularly in CRPC pts, is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01094288.

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

Ixabepilone, mitoxantrone, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer refractory to docetaxel-based therapy: A phase II study of the DOD Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5058-5058
Author(s):  
E. Small ◽  
A. Harzstark ◽  
V. K. Weinberg ◽  
D. C. Smith ◽  
P. Mathew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Vasovagal Syncope ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

5058 Background: Mitoxantrone (M) plus prednisone (P) and ixabepilone (Ix) each have modest, non cross-resistant activity as second line chemotherapy regimens in docetaxel-refractory patients with CRPC. These agents were therefore combined in a phase I study which demonstrated anti-cancer activity and defined the recommended phase II dose used in this trial. Methods: Patients with metastatic CRPC and progression after 3 or more cycles of docetaxel were enrolled in a phase II multicenter study of the combination of prednisone 5 mg BID, Ix (35 mg/m2) and M (12 mg/m2) administered intravenously on day 1 every 21 days, with pegfilgrastim (6 mg on day 2) support. Results: To date, 43 pts have been enrolled and have received a median of 4 cycles. Of 37 patients currently evaluable for response, 14 (38%; 95% CI: 22–55%) have had a confirmed ≥50% decline in PSA and 19 (51%; 95% CI 34–68%) have had a confirmed ≥30% decline in PSA. Two of 15 patients with evaluable measurable disease (13%) have had a RECIST-defined objective response. All 43 patients are evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was seen in 6 pts (17%) and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 3 (8%). Nonhematologic grade 3/4 events possibly related to study drug have included grade 3 fatigue (3 pts), grade 3 pneumonia (2 pts), and grade 3 atrial fibrillation, grade 4 myocardial infarction, grade 4 prostatitis, grade 3 nausea/vomiting, grade 3 neuropathy, grade 3 elevated transaminases, grade 3 dizziness, grade 3 dehydration, grade 3 shortness of breath, and grade 4 vasovagal syncope (1 pt each). Grade 2 neuropathy has been seen in 4 patients. Conclusions: The Ix, M, P regimen is active as second-line therapy in CRPC patients with progressive disease after docetaxel therapy and is reasonably well tolerated. Further investigation of this regimen is warranted. This study was supported in part by CTEP/NCI and the DOD Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of patupilone (P) and RAD001 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2529-2529
Author(s):  
M. N. Stein ◽  
B. Knox ◽  
E. Wesolowsky ◽  
M. Levitt ◽  
R. Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Models ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Tumor Types

2529 Background: P is an epothilone with activity in solid tumors including docetaxel (D) resistant prostate cancer. R is an oral mTOR inhibitor that demonstrates synergy with P in pre-clinical models, possibly by decreasing resistance to apoptosis. This on-going phase I study is assessing the tolerability of P in combination with R in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients with ECOG PS 0–2, adequate organ function and no more than 3 prior chemotherapy treatment received P every 21 days and weekly R using a standard 3+3 dose escalation schema in a 21 day(d) cycle starting at 50% of the phase II dose of P and 60% of the standard weekly dosing of R. Dosing levels are (1) P 5mg/m2 D1, R 30mg D1; (2) P 7.5mg/m2 D1, R 30mg D1 (3) P 7.5mg/m2 D1 R 30mg D1, D8 (3A) P 7.5mg/m2 D1 R 30mg D1, D8, D15 (3B) P 8mg/m2 D1 R 50mg D1, D8 (4) P 10 mg/m2 D1, D8 R 30mg D1, D8 (5) P 10 mg/m2 D1, D8 R 50mg D1, D8. Pharmacokinetic (PK) levels of R were obtained D1, D2 and PBMC were obtained to assess phospho-S6 and to assess markers of apoptosis and autophagy. Results: A total of 24 pts have been enrolled and 23 pts are evaluable for toxicity (tumor types: colon-7, prostate-6, lung-3, ampulla-3, leiomyosarcoma-2, cervical cancer-1). DLTs of grade(g) 3 diarrhea, g3 colitis and g3 fatigue were observed in dose levels 5, 4 and 1 pt in cohort 3A with a colostomy. Cohorts 1–3 were well tolerated with the common AEs of g1 diarrhea, g2 neuropathy after cycle 7, g1/g2 anemia, g1 triglycerides. In pts with prostate cancer (all previously pretreated with D) PSA declines of >50% occurred in 3/5 pts treated with >2 cycles; 1/7 pts with colon cancer had a PR and 3/7 pts with colon cancer had stable disease (SD) > 8 cycles; 1/3 pts with ampullary ca had a PR and a pt with cervical ca had SD x10 cycles. Conclusions: P 7.5mg/m2 and R 30mg D1, D8 is safe and well tolerated. Encouraging evidence of clinical activity is observed in prostate, colon and other tumor types. Enrollment to cohort 3A is ongoing. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

Phase I dose-escalating study of PM02734 in a 24-hour infusion schedule every 21 days in advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2511-2511
Author(s):  
T. R. Evans ◽  
A. Oaknin ◽  
R. J. Jones ◽  
A. Vandermeeren ◽  
C. Coronado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Escalating

2511 Background: PM02734 is a chemically synthesized depsipeptide with a broad spectrum of activity against solid tumors in vitro (breast, colon, lung, neuroblastoma, prostate, sarcoma and thyroid) and in vivo (breast, prostate, melanoma); as well as an acceptable non-clinical toxicology profile. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic or advanced solid tumors were enrolled in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalating study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose (RD) of PM02734 infused over 24 hours every 21 days (d). The starting dose was 0.48 mg/m2. Cohorts of 1–6 pts were treated at different dose levels. Results: Thirty seven pts were treated in this study. The median age was 55 years (40–75), sex: males/females 20/19. The median PS was 1 (range 0–2). The most frequent cancer types were colon/ gastric/ sarcoma (n=8/5/5). Most patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of prior therapy lines of 4 (1–12). Patients were treated at 8 dose levels (0.48, 0.72, 1.0, 1.6, 2.4, 3.6, 5.4, and 6.8 mg/m2), the MTD was 6.8 mg/m2 and the RD was 5.4 mg/m2 (10 mg flat dose).Common toxicities grade ≤ 2 included asthenia, nausea/emesis, lymphopenia, injection site reactions and asymptomatic elevated transaminases (TAs). DLT were grade 3 asymptomatic, reversible TA elevations at 6.8 mg/m2. Preliminary PK data is characterized by long half life (>100 h), a wide distribution and high inter-patient variability. Clearance was not correlated with dose or body surface area (BSA), therefore, flat dose was implemented and the RD was explored with this schedule. Efficacy data showed one complete response (CR) of +28 months observed in a pt with metastatic large cell esophageal carcinoma, and five more showed stable disease (SD) for more than 3 months in different histologies. Conclusions: PM02734 shows to be safe, well tolerated and with evidence of activity (1 CR and 5 SD > 3 months) in pts with advanced solid tumors. The DLT was grade 3 asymptomatic and reversible TA elevations, and the RD for further phase II studies is 10 mg. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document