BIM deletion polymorphism to predict systemic treatment outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8055-8055
Author(s):  
Jih-hsiang Lee ◽  
Yu-lin Lin ◽  
Hsuan-Yu Chen ◽  
Yeun-Chung Chang ◽  
Chong-Jen Yu ◽  
...  

8055 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapies are treatments for EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We explored the predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on first-line EGFR-TKIs and second-line chemotherapies in NSCLC patients. Methods: One hundred and six chemonaïve NSCLC patients who received first line gefitinib in a phase II study were prospectively followed until death. Clinical and molecular biomakers were correlated with PFS and OS. Results: The OS and PFS of first-line gefitinib treatment were 19.4 (95% CI 15.6-23.3) months and 7.4 (95% CI 6.7-8.1) months, respectively. Sixty-nine patients (65%) received subsequent second-line chemotherapy. Median PFS and OS of second-line chemotherapy were 5.7 (95% CI 4.8-6.6) and 15.1 (95% CI 10.5-20.2) months. Bcl-2-like protein 11 (also named as BIM) deletion polymorphism was found in 17 out of 101 (16.8%) patients tested. The median PFS from first-line gefitinib in patients carrying normal BIM and deletion polymorphism were 8.1 months and 3.6 months, respectively (p<0.001), and the median OS were 22.1 months and 14.1 months, respectively (p=0.041); in 44 patients with common EGFR mutations (del 19 or L858R), the PFS for patients carrying normal BIM and deletion polymorphism were 9.6 months and 7.4 months, respectively (p=0.034). A multivariate analysis suggested that BIM deletion polymorphism and EGFR mutational status were independent predictors for gefitinib PFS (hazard ratio 2.83, p=0.001, and 0.63, p=0.03, respectively). Conclusions: BIM deletion polymorphism predicts shorter PFS in EGFR mutation NSCLC patients treated with first line gefitinib.

Lung Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenn-Yu Wu ◽  
Chong-Jen Yu ◽  
Jin-Yuan Shih ◽  
Chih-Hsin Yang ◽  
Pan-Chyr Yang

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 3722-3730 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Huisman ◽  
E.F. Smit ◽  
G. Giaccone ◽  
P.E. Postmus

PURPOSE: Since the increased use of first-line chemotherapy for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may nowadays be considered for a growing group of patients. Guidelines for second-line treatment have to be developed yet. METHODS: We reviewed the published literature on second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC with emphasis on the role of factors such as pretreatment, response to first-line treatment, and length of disease-free-interval. RESULTS: Thirty-four single-agent-studies and 24 multidrug-studies on second-line treatment were identified. Docetaxel has been studied most extensively and is the only agent that has been studied in randomized phase III trials. Different definitions of sensitivity applied by different authors and conflicting results have been reported about the influence of response to prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Since most patients are treated with a platinum-based regimen in the first line, platinum resistance usually is a major consideration for the use of second-line agents. We argue, however, that a more general definition of drug resistance is more appropriate than resistance to platinum only. Criteria to select NSCLC patients for second-line treatment have not been defined yet. This is also important in light of the upcoming necessity to test new drugs in pretreated instead of treated patients. Guidelines for second-line treatment of NSCLC based on clinical information on drug sensitivity to first-line therapy need to be developed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20591-e20591
Author(s):  
Fengchun Mu ◽  
Bingjie Fan ◽  
Butuo Li ◽  
Wenru Qin ◽  
Xinyu Fan ◽  
...  

e20591 Background: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor versus second-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who have failure to the first-line standard treatment. Methods: We retrospectively collected patients’ data from medical records between January 2015 to July 2020 in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute. Consecutive 42 patients who were treated with nab-PTX plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor were enrolled and compared with, 126 patients who received second-line chemotherapy (1:3 matched with patient and tumor characteristics). Progress free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated for each group. Results: Patients treated with nab-PTX plus immunotherapy group and second-line chemotherapy group achieved the median PFS of 5.6 months and 3.3 months ( p = 0.043), respectively. The median OS were 7.7 months and 6.3 months ( p = 0.021), respectively. The ORR and DCR were also higher in nab-PTX plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group (ORR: 33.3% vs 20.6%, p = 0.094; DCR: 61.9% vs 41.3%, p = 0.020, respectively). The most common incidences of grade ≥3 adverse events were leukopenia and neutropenia, there were no significance difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Albumin-bound paclitaxel plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor conferred higher ORR and DCR, and improved PFS and OS in SCLC patients failed with first-line treatment. Further prospective and randomized trial that directly compares the treatments is urgently warranted.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S92
Author(s):  
Pedro S. Barradas ◽  
Ana S. Oliveira ◽  
Agostino S. Costa ◽  
Ana M. Figueiredo ◽  
Ana P. Alves ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3034-3034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth A. Quoix ◽  
Frederic Forget ◽  
Zsolt Papai-Szekely ◽  
Christian H.H Ottensmeier ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document