Zoledronic acid for hormone-naive prostate cancer with bone metastasis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16092-e16092
Author(s):  
Masahiro Nozawa ◽  
Isao Hara ◽  
Kazuhiro Nagao ◽  
Hideyasu Matsuyama ◽  
Hirotsugu Uemura

e16092 Background: The potency of zoledronic acid for hormone-naïve prostate cancer is unclear. We conducted a phase II study to investigate the benefit of administering zoledronic acid concomitant with androgen-deprivation therapy in treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients with bone metastases, in which the primary endpoint was skeleton-related event (SRE)-free survival at 24 months after treatment. Methods: Treatment-naïve male patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and radiologic evidence of bone metastasis were eligible. Treatment consisted of bicalutamide 80 mg administered orally on Day 1 and every day, goserelin acetate 10.8 mg administered subcutaneously on Day 8 and every 12 weeks, and zoledronic acid 4 mg administered intravenously on Day 8 and every four weeks. Results: Between July 2008 and April 2010, a total of 53 patients were enrolled and 52 evaluable. Median age was 72 years (range, 55 - 86). Median primary PSA was 249.4 ng/ml (range, 2.19 –19201). Median follow-up period was 33.3 months. The SRE-free survival rate at 24 months after treatment was 82.7 %. Median time to PSA progression was 25.9 months (95% confidential interval, 17.97-24.43). The score of the extent of bone diseases was stable or decreased in 73 % of the patients at 24 months after treatment. The grade-3 osteonecrosis of the jaw was reported in three patients (5.8 %). Conclusions: Our results suggest the potency of the early introduction of zoledronic acid for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Future studies are certainly required to ascertain the most appropriate timing of the commencement of zoledronic acid for patients with bone-metastatic prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000007548.

Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (6) ◽  
pp. 1090-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
William K. Oh ◽  
Kevin Proctor ◽  
Mari Nakabayashi ◽  
Carolyn Evan ◽  
Lauren K. Tormey ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5161-5161
Author(s):  
C. McHugh ◽  
K. Madigan ◽  
A. Walsh ◽  
J. Fox ◽  
T. W. Leonard ◽  
...  

5161 Background: The primary objective of this study is to examine the pharmacodynamic effects of two different regimens of zoledronic acid, Orazol 20 mg tablets versus Zometa 4mg IV infusion once-monthly therapy on biomarkers in male bisphosphonate-naïve hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Methods: The study is an open-label, multi-center phase II clinical trial to compare oral Orazol 20 mg tablets weekly, to infusions of intravenous Zometa 4mg monthly, in males with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, bone metastases, and no prior bisphosphonate treatment. Patients were assigned into one of three cohorts. The three treatments administered were IV Zometa, 4 mg, 15 minute infusion, Day 0 and Day 28; Orazol po, 20 mg, Days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49; and Orazol po, 20 mg, Days 0, 1, 2, 3, 28, 35, 42, and 49. The study population consisted of men with hormone refractory prostate cancer as evidenced by history of rising PSA levels (last 2 of 3 PSA levels must be above nadir), who are bisphosphonate-naive, and have radiographically-confirmed bone metastases. Efficacy assessments: The primary endpoints are the assessment of response of four biomarkers, urinary NTX, serum CTX, serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase, and serum calcium on days -7, 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, and 56. Secondary endpoints are assessments of performance and pain scores based on ECOG performance status, BPI, and analgesic use. Safety assessments include physical examinations, vital signs and body weight, hematology panel, urinalysis, and blood chemistry panel. Results: The results demonstrated a rapid decrease for all four biomarkers. This decrease was seen at seven days, and was sustained throughout the study. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the treatments in the primary and secondary endpoints. Conclusions: From the results of MER-101–03, Orazol weekly therapy appears to be as effective as Zometa, based on the biomarkers analyzed. Orazol offers a substantial improvement in therapy over IV infusion for patients, with efficacy that is at least comparable based on the results obtained here. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Nutrisia Aquariushinta Sayuti ◽  
Tri Murti Andayani ◽  
Dwi Endarti ◽  
Kartika Widayati

Zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid are listed in the Indonesian national formulary to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients diagnosed with bone metastasis in multiple myeloma (MM), with limited evidence to compare their effectiveness. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid in delaying SRE. The method was the retrospective, with data obtained from the multicenter study for MM patients with bone metastasis (aged over 18 years), based on medical records between January 2016 and December 2018. Patients were assigned to zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid groups. The clinical outcome was the next SRE which consists of vertebral/bone fracture, spinal cord compression leading to the need for surgery or radiation, and adverse event (AE) due to 2 years of drugs usage. Result of this research was made up of a total of seventy (70) patients with  40  in the zoledronic acid group, and 30 in ibandronic acid. At median treatment duration of 8 months (range: 2 – 24 month), SRE incident in zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid were 20.0 % and 23.3 % respectively. Furthermore, their mean SRE free survival times were 21 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 19 - 23 months], and 19 months [95% CI, 16 – 22 months], respectively. Also, their time intervals were not significantly different (p>0.05). The osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was AE which occurred more in zoledronic acid than ibandronic acid. The conclusion was zoledronic acid tends to delay SRE time compared to ibandronic acid, although more ONJ occur.


2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 756-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marnix G. E. H. Lam ◽  
Amel Dahmane ◽  
Wil H. M. Stevens ◽  
Peter P. van Rijk ◽  
John M. H. de Klerk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document