Novel factor to improve prediction of sentinel node positivity in patients with clinical T1/T2 breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Miraj G. Shah-Khan ◽  
Tiffany Torstensen ◽  
Tanya L. Hoskin ◽  
Marilyn Morton ◽  
Darcy Adamczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sentinel Node ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression ◽  
Good Discrimination ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Mskcc Nomogram ◽  
Md Anderson

49 Background: Predicting nodal positivity can guide surgical planning in breast cancer. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) have established nomograms to predict sentinel node positivity. We propose that addition of distance of tumor from the nipple (DFN) can improve their performance. Methods: With IRB approval clinical T1/T2 tumors with pre-biopsy ultrasound were reviewed. MSKCC and MDACC nomogram predictions and the AUC-ROC were calculated. The addition of DFN was examined using multiple logistic regression and comparison of AUC-ROC values. Results: 401 breast cancers with clinical T1 (85%) or T2 (15%) tumors in 395 patients were included; of which 79/401 (19.7%) were node positive. Tumors were significantly closer to the nipple in those with positive nodes. 17/33 (51.5%) tumors within 2 cm of the nipple were node-positive versus 62/368 (16.8%) tumors > 2 cm from the nipple (p<0.0001). The MSKCC and MDACC nomograms each demonstrated good discrimination between node positive and negative patients with AUC-ROC values of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.77) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.81), respectively. When added to the MSKCC nomogram, DFN ≤2 cm contributed significantly (OR 4.78, p=0.0001) to prediction of node positivity and improved the AUC-ROC to 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.80). Similarly, DFN ≤2 cm was significant (OR 4.73, p=0.0002) when added to the MDACC nomogram and improved the AUC to 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.82). Within nomogram probability categories, the proportion with positive nodes was consistently higher with DFN ≤2 cm. Conclusions: Tumor distance from nipple is associated with nodal positivity. When added to nomograms it improves prediction of node positivity. DFN should be considered when considering likelihood of nodal positivity for treatment planning. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Non-sentinel Node Involvement in Sentinel Node Positive Patients and Validation of MSKCC Nomogram in Indian Breast Cancer Population

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen Padmanabhan ◽  
Muhamed Faizal Ayub ◽  
Khadher Hussain ◽  
Ann Kurien ◽  
Selvi Radhakrishna
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sentinel Node ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Mskcc Nomogram ◽  
Node Involvement

scholarly journals Influence of Germline BRCA Genotype on the Survival of Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-147
Author(s):  
Cynthia Villarreal-Garza ◽  
Ana S. Ferrigno ◽  
Alejandro Aranda-Gutierrez ◽  
Paul H. Frankel ◽  
Nora H. Ruel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Mutational Status

The presence of BRCA pathogenic variants (PV) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a distinctive genomic profile that makes the tumor particularly susceptible to DNA-damaging treatments. However, patients with BRCA PVs can develop treatment resistance through the appearance of reversion mutations and restored BRCA expression. As copy-number variants (CNV) could be less susceptible to reversion mutations than point mutations, we hypothesize that carriers of BRCA CNVs may have improved survival after treatment compared with carriers of other BRCA PVs or BRCA wild-type. Women diagnosed with stage I–III TNBC at ≤50 years at a cancer center in Mexico City were screened for BRCA PVs using a recurrent PV assay (HISPANEL; 77% sensitivity). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the mutational status. Among 180 women, 17 (9%) were carriers of BRCA1 ex9–12del CNVs and 26 (14%) of other BRCA PVs. RFS at ten years for the whole cohort was 79.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72.3–84.6], with no significant differences according to mutational status. 10-year OS for the entire cohort was 85.3% (95% CI, 78.7–90.0), with BRCA CNV carriers demonstrating numerically superior OS rates other PV carriers and noncarriers (100% vs. 78.6% and 84.7%; log-rank P = 0.037 and P = 0.051, respectively). This study suggests that BRCA1 ex9–12del CNV carriers with TNBC may have a better OS, and supports the hypothesis that the genotype of BRCA PVs may influence survival by limiting treatment resistance mediated by reversion mutations among CNV carriers. Significance: Large CNV BRCA carriers in a cohort of young Mexican patients with TNBC had superior OS rates than carriers of other BRCA pathogenic variants (i.e., small indels or point mutations). We hypothesize that this is due to the resistance of CNVs to reversion mutations mediating resistance to therapy. If validated, these findings have important prognostic and clinical treatment implications for BRCA-associated breast cancers.

Analysis of Low Estrogen Receptor (ER+) Breast Carcinomas in a Large Community Breast Cancer Center in Northern California

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S26-S27
Author(s):  
G Bulusu ◽  
K Duncan ◽  
A Wheeler
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Carcinomas ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Er Positive

Abstract Introduction/Objective Estrogen Receptor (ER) expression in breast cancers is a crucial factor for endocrine therapy in patients with tumors expressing ER in ≥1% of tumor cells. The 2019 guidelines published by ASCO/CAP states that breast cancers that have a 1% to 10% of cells staining Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive should be reported as ER Low Positive cases. This study aims to address this subset of low-positive ER tumors and compare the clinical features to other known breast cancer subtypes. Methods/Case Report We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained breast cancer registry from 2013 to 2021 at Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, a Sutter Health Affiliate. The study reviewed patient charts with respect to the pathology report, operative report, chemotherapy regimen, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were conducted using R Project for Statistical Coding, with The Student’s T-test used to compare continuous variables. Two-sided P values less than 0.05 indicate statistical significance. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Our study identified 1316 cases of invasive breast carcinomas, of which 29 (2.16%) demonstrated ER Low-Positive expression. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and pathological features, such as histological grade, ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67%, and patient age for these tumors. We found that ER Low-Positive tumors demonstrated higher mean histological grade morphology (2.5 out of 3, p&lt;0.001) that was similar to that of Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) (3 of 3, p&lt;0.001) than to High ER-Positive (1.6 of 3, p&lt;0.001) cancers. Further observations, through examining proliferation rates by utilizing the Ki-67 index, indicate comparative trends between the ER Low-Positive cohort and the TNBC cohort. Conclusion The results suggest that the ER Low-Positive carcinomas, despite reported as ER-positive cases, present with similar clinicopathological features to those of ER-negative tumors. Through this study and future research, we would like to emphasize a stricter set of guidelines that can be adopted to reduce variability for reporting biomarkers. This standardization will allow oncologists to provide more appropriate treatment options and improve the quality of patient care.

p53 and bcl-2 expression correlates with clinical outcome in a series of node-positive breast cancer patients.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1604-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Silvestrini ◽  
E Benini ◽  
S Veneroni ◽  
M G Daidone ◽  
G Tomasic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Mitochondrial Protein ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
P53 Overexpression ◽  
P53 Expression ◽  
Node Positive

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The tumor-suppressor gene TP53 and the proto-oncogene bcl-2 encode, respectively, for a nuclear phosphoprotein and for a mitochondrial protein involved in multiple cellular functions. The proteins provide prognostic information in node-negative breast cancer and are supposed to influence treatment responsiveness. We analyzed the predictive role of p53 and bcl-2 expression, alone and in association with other variables, in postmenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers treated with radical or conservative surgery plus radiotherapy and adjuvant tamoxifen for at least 1 year. PATIENTS AND METHODS On 240 resectable cancers, we determined the expression of p53 and bcl-2, using immunohistochemistry, cell proliferation (3H-thymidine labeling index [3H-dT LI]), and ER and progesterone receptors (PgR). RESULTS p53 expression and 3H-dT LI were weakly related to one another and both were unrelated to bcl-2. Relapse-free and distant metastasis-free survival at 5 years were significantly lower for patients with tumors that highly expressed p53 (P = .0001) and for those that weakly expressed or did not express bcl-2 (P = .02). However, p53, but not bcl-2, provided prognostic information independent of tumor size, axillary node involvement, steroid receptors, and 3H-dT LI. Moreover, the simultaneous p53 overexpression and lack of PgR identified patients at maximum risk of relapse, whereas bcl-2 overexpression, associated with a low 3H-dT LI or the presence of PgR, improved the prognostic resolution for low-risk patients. CONCLUSION p53 expression appears to be indicative of clinical outcome in postmenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen. Whether p53 overexpression and weak bcl-2 expression are indicators of biologic aggressiveness, regardless of treatment, or of hormone resistance remains to be defined.

Node positive breast cancer: Concordance between baseline PET/CT and sentinel node assessment after neoadjuvant therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Leopoldo Christin ◽  
Jonathan Kuten ◽  
Einat Even-Sapir ◽  
Joseph Klausner ◽  
Tehillah S. Menes
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Sentinel Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document