Combined sunitinib and IMRT for preoperative treatment of locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma: Results of a phase I trial of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group GISG 03.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10541-10541
Author(s):  
Jens Jakob ◽  
Anna Simeonova ◽  
Bernd Kasper ◽  
Ulrich Ronellenfitsch ◽  
Geraldine Rauch ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1616-1623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Canter ◽  
Dariusz Borys ◽  
Abimbola Olusanya ◽  
Chin-Shang Li ◽  
Li-Yuan Lee ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. e003626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Jakob ◽  
Geraldine Rauch ◽  
Frederik Wenz ◽  
Peter Hohenberger

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 1195-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick L. M. Haas ◽  
Hans Gelderblom ◽  
Stefan Sleijfer ◽  
Hester H. van Boven ◽  
Astrid Scholten ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 2111-2117 ◽  
Author(s):  
E S Casper ◽  
G K Schwartz ◽  
A Sugarman ◽  
D Leung ◽  
M F Brennan

PURPOSE To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (LED) when used every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Doxorubicin encapsulated in egg phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol liposomes was given to patients with sarcoma in a disease-specific phase I trial. The initial dose was 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg. The MTD was defined as the highest dose that could be given every 2 weeks. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients participated in this study. Major toxicities included myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and mucositis. Eight patients were hospitalized for nadir fever. No cardiotoxicity was seen. The MTD was LED 105 mg/m2 with G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg. LED 120 mg/m2 resulted in tolerable, albeit prominent, acute toxicity, but did not permit recycling of therapy on day 15. Among 26 patients with soft tissue sarcoma, 23 had measurable disease, of whom three achieved a partial response (13%; 95% confidence interval, 2% to 34%). CONCLUSION LED can be administered every 2 weeks at a dose of 105 mg/m2 with G-CSF support, which provides a dose-intensity of 52.5 mg/m2/wk. To exceed this intensity, the dose of LED that would have to be administered every 3 weeks would be greater than 157.5 mg/m2. A formal phase II trial is needed to estimate better the true response rate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11544-11544
Author(s):  
Sylvie Bonvalot ◽  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
Juliette Thariat ◽  
Sebastien Carrère ◽  
Anne Ducassou ◽  
...  

11544 Background: NBTXR3, a novel radioenhancer activated by radiotherapy (RT) demonstrated superior efficacy, as preoperative treatment, in patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (LA STS), compared to RT alone. Primary endpoint of pCR rate was 16% vs 8% (p=0.044) and R0 margin rate was 77% vs 64% (p=0.042) (Bonvalot et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). No modification of the early safety profile of RT was observed, leading to market authorization. Here we report on the long-term safety, limb function and quality of life. Methods: This phase II/III randomized (1:1), international trial included adult patients with LA STS of the extremity or trunk wall, requiring preoperative RT (NCT02379845). Patients were treated with either a single intratumoral injection of NBTXR3 (volume equivalent to 10% of tumor volume, at 53.3g/L) plus EBRT (arm A), or EBRT alone (arm B) (50 Gy in 25 fractions), followed by surgery. The primary and main secondary efficacy endpoints were previously reported. Safety of NBTXR3+RT, as preoperative treatment, was evaluated as secondary endpoint. We present the safety analyses done in the “all treated population”, with data recorded during at least a two-year follow-up. Important parameters related to HR-QoL, including functional outcome were studied using the EQ-5D, RNLI, TESS and MSTS questionnaires. Results: Patients had at least two-year follow-up and the lost to follow-up rate was very low (1.9%). RT-related SAEs were observed in 11.2% (10/89) vs 13.3% (12/90) in A vs B. Post-treatment AEs, any grade, were observed in 51.7% (46/89) vs 57.8% (52/90) and serious post-treatment AEs in 13.5% (12/89) vs 24.4% (22/90) of patients in A vs B. Second primary cancer was observed in 1 patient in arm A and 6 patients in arm B. Long-term safety continues to demonstrate that NBTXR3 plus RT has no impact on post-surgical wound complications (24.7% vs 36.7%, A vs B). Furthermore, the evaluation of radiation late toxicities in limbs such as fibrosis (4.5% vs 7.7%), arthrosis (2.2% vs 0.0%) and edema (6.7% vs 2.2%) that may alter limb function showed no difference between arms. Accordingly, HR-QoL evaluation yielded no difference in functional outcome. In addition, the intratumoral injection of NBTXR3 did not induce cancer cell seeding at the former tumor site. Finally, sequelae or chronic tissue disturbances at the former tumor localization were similar in both treatment arms, confirming that the increase of energy dose deposit and the physical presence of NBTXR3 did not impact post-treatment limb functions. Conclusions: The long-term safety results demonstrate that the addition of NBTXR3 to EBRT neither added toxicity nor modified the bystander effect of RT. The results presented here associated with the efficacy data reported previously reinforce the favorable benefit-risk ratio of the use of NBTXR3 in patients with LA STS. Clinical trial information: NCT02379845.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document