Timed-sequential therapy with mibefradil and temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: A phase I Adult Brain Tumor Consortium study.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2033-2033
Author(s):  
Matthias Holdhoff ◽  
Xiaobu Ye ◽  
Louis B. Nabors ◽  
Arati Suvas Desai ◽  
Tom Mikkelsen ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2105-TPS2105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Holdhoff ◽  
Stuart A. Grossman ◽  
Jeffrey G. Supko ◽  
Xiaobu Ye ◽  
Joy D. Fisher ◽  
...  

TPS2105 Background: Despite recent advances in their treatment, high-grade gliomas (HGG) carry a dismal prognosis. Treatment options at recurrence are particularly limited and a re-challenge with temozolomide (TMZ) frequently appears as the most appropriate systemic treatment option in patients whose progression occurred off TMZ. This study investigates the sequential treatment of mibefradil (MIB), a selective Cav3 calcium channel blocker, and standard dose TMZ. Preclinical data showed that Cav3 inhibitors such as MIB can slow tumor growth without significant effect on normal tissues and can induce cell cycle arrest in cancer cells at the G1/S-phase checkpoint. We hypothesize that withdrawal of MIB could synchronize and release cells into S-phase, thereby potentiating the cytotoxic effect of TMZ. Methods: This trial is an open-label, multicenter phase I study, structured into a dose escalation phase to determine the maximum tolerated dose of MIB (MTD; Primary Objective) and an expansion cohort of 10 patients at the MTD level. Adults with recurrent HGG (WHO grade 3 or 4) who have previously received standard adjuvant therapy with radiation (RT) and TMZ (last dose ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment) and who have not received other cytotoxic therapy (except for carmustine wafers) are eligible. Patients receive oral MIB for 7 days on a 4 x/day (QID) schedule, followed by standard dose TMZ at 150-200 mg/m2 for 5 days each 28-day cycle. Dose finding uses a modified 3+3 design, starting at MIB 25 mg po QID (100 mg/day) with dose increases of 25 mg/dose per dose level. The target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate is ≤ 33%. Secondary Objectives: (1) safety and adverse event analysis (incl. cardiac monitoring during cycle 1), (2) pharmacokinetic profile of MIB, (3) response assessment (RANO criteria), and (4) assessment of the potential effect of MIB on tumor DNA synthesis as determined by fluorothymidine positron emission tomography (FLT PET; extension cohort). Enrollment status as of January 2013: cohort 1 completed without DLT; cohort 2 enrolling at MIB 200 mg/day. Clinical trial information: NCT01480050.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 6032-6039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eudocia Q. Lee ◽  
Vinay K. Puduvalli ◽  
Joel M. Reid ◽  
John G. Kuhn ◽  
Kathleen R. Lamborn ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2061-2061
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Raizer ◽  
Sean Aaron Grimm ◽  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
Ivo Tremont-Lukats ◽  
W. K. Alfred Yung ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2003-2003
Author(s):  
Stuart A. Grossman ◽  
Louis B. Nabors ◽  
Joy D. Fisher ◽  
Patrick Y. Wen ◽  
William C. Timmer ◽  
...  

2003 Background: : In the early 1990’s, the NCI suspended activities of the Brain Tumor Study Group seeking to shift clinical brain tumor research from phase III trials to innovative and correlative rich phase I/II studies. In 1994, NCI funded three early phase brain tumor consortia, later reduced to two consortia in 1999 and one in 2009. In 2020, the NCI announced it would discontinue funding the brain tumor consortium and emphasize pre-clinical glioblastoma drug development (RFA-CA-20-047). Methods: The activities of the New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT: 1994-2009) and Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC: 2009-2021) were summarized using data from the Central Operations Office that served the consortia for 27 years. Results: From 1994-2020, 48 consortium meetings were held to discuss, develop, conduct, and evaluate early phase clinical trials. These involved multidisciplinary brain tumor experts (neuro-oncologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, neuropathologists, statisticians, pharmacologists, imaging experts, immunologists, etc) from 27 US academic centers and hospitals. 85 clinical trials were written, approved by NCI and the Brain Malignancy Steering Committee, and conducted. Most trials evaluated NCI-provided therapeutic agents. 34 trials were conducted in collaboration with 27 pharmaceutical companies eager to develop malignant brain tumor therapeutics; for 9 of these the consortia held the IND. 4870 patients were accrued: 3375 to therapeutic and 1495 to non-therapeutic studies. 49 grant proposals were submitted to fund consortium activities with a 46% approval rate. 91 peer reviewed manuscripts were published, with 174 presentations and abstracts. 18 pharmaceutical symposia were conducted to attract new agents toward early phase brain tumor research. Consortia sponsored 34 Guest Lectureships and multidisciplinary symposia to focus on relevant critical research areas. Additionally, the consortia provided unique opportunities for young faculty to lead multicenter NABTT/ABTC trials with appropriate support and mentorship. Conclusions: Therapeutic progress for high grade gliomas has been slow for many reasons (95% of systemically administered agents do not penetrate the blood-brain barrier, inherent treatment resistance, immunologically “cold” phenotype, etc). NABTT/ABTC focused multidisciplinary, multi-institutional experts on major challenges unique to brain tumor research. The consortia developed innovative early phase clinical studies rich in correlative endpoints, fostered research grants, hosted relevant topical symposia, and provided leadership roles for young investigators while bringing together the NCI, industry, and committed multidisciplinary academicians to explore novel therapeutic options for patients with primary brain tumors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl 5) ◽  
pp. v15.1-v15
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Raizer ◽  
Sean Grimm ◽  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
Ivo Tremont-Lukats ◽  
Alfred Yung ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.


2013 ◽  
Vol 260 (6) ◽  
pp. 1469-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilios Karavasilis ◽  
Vassiliki Kotoula ◽  
George Pentheroudakis ◽  
Despina Televantou ◽  
Sofia Lambaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document