LDH serum levels as prognostic and predictive factor in advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 313-313
Author(s):  
Luca Faloppi ◽  
Michela Del Prete ◽  
Mario Scartozzi ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Maristella Bianconi ◽  
...  

313 Background: Previous data suggested that LDH serum levels may be associated with tumour hypoxia and VEGFA and VEGFR-1 over-expression. LDH may then represent an indirect marker of activated tumour neo-angiogenesis and worse prognosis in many tumour types. In our analysis, we analyzed the role of LDH serum levels in predicting clinical outcome for biliary tract cancer patients treated with first-line cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy, to individuate a potentially reliable and easy to use marker for patients stratification. Methods: 71 advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine in first-line chemotherapy were available for our analysis. For all patients, LDH values were collected within one month before treatment beginning. We chose the laboratory cut-off (Upper Normal Rate, UNR) as LDH cut-off value (450 U/l) and then we divided the patients into two groups (A and B, below and above the UNR respectively). Survival distribution was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed with chi-square test. A significant level of 0.05 was chosen to assess the statistical significance. Results: Patients in group A (46 patients) and B (25 patients) proved homogeneous for all clinical characteristics analyzed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.97 months and 1.8 months respectively in group A (patients with LDH level below the UNR) and in group B (patients with LDH level above the UNR), p=0.0064 (HR=2.07, 95%CI: 1.07-3.99). Median overall survival (OS) was 9.24 months and 2.55 months in group A and B respectively, p<0.0001 (HR=2.93; 95%CI: 1.37-6.27). DCR was 65% in group A vs. 21% in group B (p=0.004). Conclusions: Our observations seem to suggest a prognostic role of LDH in biliary tract cancer patients. Our findings showing an improved PFS and DCR in patients with low LDH serum levels also suggest a possible predictive role in patients treated with a cisplatin and gemcitabine regimen as first-line chemotherapy. After further confirmation in larger trial, these results may be relevant for a better patients stratification and selection.

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vi99
Author(s):  
M. Del Prete ◽  
L. Faloppi ◽  
A. Casadei Gardini ◽  
D. Santini ◽  
N. Silvestris ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15126-e15126
Author(s):  
Luca Faloppi ◽  
Michela Del Prete ◽  
Andrea Casadei Gardini ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Nicola Silvestris ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Faloppi ◽  
Michela Del Prete ◽  
Andrea Casadei Gardini ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Nicola Silvestris ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Roberto Filippi ◽  
Francesco Montagnani ◽  
Pasquale Lombardi ◽  
Lorenzo Fornaro ◽  
Giuseppe Aprile ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 352-352
Author(s):  
Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽  
Shinji Endo ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Takeshi Yamada ◽  
Akinori Sugaya ◽  
...  

352 Background: Chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC) has progressed. Now gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination is considered the standard 1st-line treatment based on the results of many randomized studies. However, the impact of various efficacy parameters on overall survival (OS) remains unclear. Methods: We searched PubMed database with the key words of (“biliary tract neoplasms” or “bile duct neoplasms” or “gallbladder neoplasms” or “cholangiocarcinoma” [All fields]) AND (“chemotherapy”[All fields]) AND Clinical trial [ptyp] between Apr 1984 to Jun 2013 and abstracts presented at the meetings of ASCO/Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (2004–2013) and ESMO/WCGC (2002–2013). Then we identified randomized trials of 1st-line chemotherapy for ABC, and analyzed the relations between the results of OS and those of progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), post-progression survival (PPS = median OS − median PFS/TTP), and the proportion of patients who received 2nd-line chemotherapy (%2nd). Results: Among 329 papers/abstracts retrieved, 13 randomized trials, 26 treatment arms of first-line chemotherapy for ABC were identified. Number of trials with information on median OS, median PFS/TTP, hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS/TTP, RR, DCR, and %2nd were 13, 13, 6, 13, 12, and 7, respectively. The analysis of all these trials demonstrated the median values (range) of OS, PFS/TTP, HR of OS, HR of PFS/TTP, RR, DCR, PPS, and %2nd were 9.4 (4.6–13) months, 5.3 (2.7–8.5) months, 0.71 (0.39–0.93), 0.65 (0.44–0.85), 20 (7.1–36) %, 67 (21–87) %, 4.0 (1.0–7.6) months, and 41 (15–79) %, respectively. Spearman rank correlation coefficient of differences (Δ) OS with ΔPFS/TTP, ΔRR, ΔDCR, and ΔPPS were 0.66, − 0.07, 0.66, and 0.34, respectively. The correlation coefficient between HRs for PFS/TTP and OS was 0.60. The correlation coefficient between ΔPPS and Δ%2nd was − 0.15. Conclusions: OS was moderately associated with PFS/TTP and DCR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document