18F-choline PET/CT for the assesment of pelvic lymph node metastases in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
Ivan Federico Pinto ◽  
Camilo Sandoval ◽  
Jorge Gonzalo Diaz ◽  
Alvaro Daniel Vidal ◽  
Jaime Antonio Altamirano ◽  
...  

61 Background: Assesment of pelvic lymph node involvement is a major dilemma due to poor diagnostic accuracy of conventional imaging such as computed tomography of the pelvis or magnetic resonance of the pelvis. Recently incorporation of new tools such as 18F-choline PET/CT address this issue, although there are few studies in this set of patients. To evaluate the 18-choline PET/CT diagnostic accuracy for staging of pelvic lymph node involvement in patients with high risk prostate cancer. Methods: Patients with diagnosis of high risk prostate cancer according to D’Amico risk assessment criteria where staged with a 18F-choline PET/CT prior to treatment with retropubic radical prostatectomy plus superextended bilateral lymph node dissection at our institution. 18F-choline PET/CT was compared with the results of pathological analisys of lymph nodes. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for 18F-choline PET/CT. Results: Between January 2012 and August 2014 a total of 36 patients met the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of high prostate cancer (cT2c or more or PSA above 20 ng/ml or a gleason score 8-10), good performance status (ECOG 0-2) and a 18F-choline PET/CT as a preoperative staging procedure. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were 64%, 92%, 77% and 85% respectively. Conclusions: 18F-choline PET/CT is a non invasive procedure that provides good information regarding pelvic lymph node involvement status that is better than the results of other techniques in published series, with a higher sensitivity in our group of patients. It is highly specific which means there is a very good chance that a patient with a normal study does not have lymph node metastases when analyzed.

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Y. Benameur ◽  
O. Ait Sahel ◽  
S. Nabih Oueriagli ◽  
J. El Bekkali ◽  
A. Doudouh

2017 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Gandaglia ◽  
Emanuele Zaffuto ◽  
Nicola Fossati ◽  
Marco Bandini ◽  
Nazareno Suardi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimmi Bjöersdorff ◽  
Christopher Puterman ◽  
Jenny Oddstig ◽  
Jennifer Amidi ◽  
Sophia Zackrisson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can be used to detect and stage metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Improvements to hardware, such as digital technology, and to software, such as reconstruction algorithms, have recently been made. We compared the capability of detecting regional lymph node metastases using conventional and digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based PET-CT technology for [18F]-fluorocholine (FCH). Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) histopathology was used as the reference method.Methods: Retrospectively, a consecutive series of patients with prostate cancer who had undergone staging with FCH PET-CT before ePLND were included. Images were obtained with either a conventional or a SiPM-based PET-CT and compared. FCH uptake in pelvic lymph nodes beyond the uptake in the mediastinal blood pool was considered to be abnormal.Results: One hundred eighty patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were examined using a conventional Philips Gemini PET-CT (n = 93) between 2015 and 2017 or a digital GE Discovery MI PET-CT (n = 87) from 2017 to 2018. Images that were obtained using the Philips Gemini PET-CT system showed 19 patients (20%) with suspected lymph node metastases compared with 40 patients (46%) using the GE Discovery MI PET-CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were 0.30, 0.84, 0.47, and 0.72, respectively, for the Philips Gemini and 0.60, 0.58, 0.30, and 0.83, respectively for GE Discovery MI. Area under the curve (AUC) in a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was similar between the two PET-CT systems (0.58 and 0.58, P = 0.8).Conclusions: A marked difference in sensitivity and specificity was found for the different PET-CT systems, although similar overall diagnostic performance. This is probably due to differences in both hard- and software, including reconstruction algorithms, and should be considered when new technology is introduced.


Urology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 883-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Wyler ◽  
Tullio Sulser ◽  
Hans-Helge Seifert ◽  
Robin Ruszat ◽  
Thomas H. Forster ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Martorana ◽  
R. Schiavina ◽  
E. Brunocilla ◽  
S. Concetti ◽  
A. Bertaccini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document