scholarly journals Does Valproic Acid or Levetiracetam Improve Survival in Glioblastoma? A Pooled Analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 731-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Happold ◽  
Thierry Gorlia ◽  
Olivier Chinot ◽  
Mark R. Gilbert ◽  
L. Burt Nabors ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Antiepileptic Drug ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Purpose Symptomatic epilepsy is a common complication of glioblastoma and requires pharmacotherapy. Several uncontrolled retrospective case series and a post hoc analysis of the registration trial for temozolomide indicated an association between valproic acid (VPA) use and improved survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients and Methods To confirm the hypothesis suggested above, a combined analysis of survival association of antiepileptic drug use at the start of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide was performed in the pooled patient cohort (n = 1,869) of four contemporary randomized clinical trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: AVAGlio (Avastin in Glioblastoma; NCT00943826), CENTRIC (Cilengitide, Temozolomide, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma and Methylated Gene Promoter Status; NCT00689221), CORE (Cilengitide, Temozolomide, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma and Unmethylated Gene Promoter Status; NCT00813943), and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0825 (NCT00884741). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between: (1) any VPA use and no VPA use at baseline or (2) VPA use both at start of and still after chemoradiotherapy. Results of Cox regression models stratified by trial and adjusted for baseline prognostic factors were analyzed. The same analyses were performed with levetiracetam (LEV). Results VPA use at start of chemoradiotherapy was not associated with improved PFS or OS compared with all other patients pooled (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.07; P = .241; OS: HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; P = .633). Furthermore, PFS and OS of patients taking VPA both at start of and still after chemoradiotherapy were not different from those without antiepileptic drug use at both time points (PFS: HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.15; P = .467; OS: HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.40; P = .440). Similarly, no association with improved outcomes was observed for LEV use. Conclusion The results of this analysis do not justify the use of VPA or LEV for reasons other than seizure control in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma outside clinical trials.

RTOG 0913: A phase I study of daily everolimus (RAD001) in combination with radiation therapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2047-2047
Author(s):  
Prakash Chinnaiyan ◽  
Minhee Won ◽  
Patrick Y. Wen ◽  
Amyn Rojiani ◽  
Merideth M Wendland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Molecular Determinants ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

2047 Background: To determine the safety of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) administered daily with concurrent radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. Methods: Everolimus was administered daily with concurrent radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) and temozolomide (TMZ) (75 mg/m2/day). Everolimus was escalated from 2.5 (Dose Level 1), to 5 (Dose Level 2), to 10 mg/day (Dose Level 3). Maintenance TMZ was delivered at 150-200 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 every 28 days for up to 12 cycles with concurrent everolimus at the previously established daily dose of 10 mg/day. Dose escalation continued if a dose level produced DLTs in ≤ 2 of the first 6 evaluable patients. Results: Between October 28, 2010 and July 2, 2012, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0913 protocol initially registered a total of 35 patients, with 25 patients successfully meeting enrollment criteria, receiving drug and evaluable for toxicity. Everolimus was successfully escalated to the predetermined MTD of 10 mg/day. Two of the first 6 eligible patients experienced a DLT at each dose level. DLTs included: gait disturbance, febrile neutropenia, rash, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, hypoxia, ear pain, headache, and mucositis. Other common toxicities were Grade 1/2 hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. At the time of analysis, there was one death reported, which was attributed to tumor progression. Conclusions: Daily oral everolimus (10 mg) combined with both concurrent radiation therapy and TMZ followed by maintenance TMZ, is well tolerated, with an acceptable toxicity profile. A phase II randomized clinical trial with mandatory correlative biomarker analysis is currently underway, designed to both determine the efficacy of this regimen and identify molecular determinants of response. Supported by RTOG U10 CA21661 and CCOP U10 CA37422 grants from NCI and Novartis. Clinical trial information: NCT01062399.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document