Lymphedema Precautions: Time to Abandon Old Practices?

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 655-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soojin Ahn ◽  
Elisa R. Port

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 46-year-old premenopausal woman with a body mass index of 21 was found on screening mammography to have a new, approximately 1-cm spiculated mass with associated calcifications in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. Stereotactic core biopsy showed a focus of invasive duct carcinoma, strongly positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, with associated ductal carcinoma in situ. Clinical examination revealed no palpable mass or axillary lymphadenopathy. She underwent a left lumpectomy with seed localization and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Final pathology revealed an 8-mm well-differentiated invasive carcinoma without lymphovascular invasion and intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in situ. The margins were clear, and three sentinel lymph nodes were negative for metastasis. The 21-gene recurrence score was 10, suggesting a 7% risk of 10-year distant recurrence with adjuvant endocrine treatment. After the completion of adjuvant radiotherapy (42.50 Gy in 16 fractions to the breast), the patient has returned for a follow-up visit. She is a professional violinist and would like to know what she can do to prevent lymphedema on her upcoming flight to Vienna.

Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyo Tanaka ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Naoki Hayashi ◽  
Yasuaki Sagara ◽  
Fumikata Hara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We conducted a prospective study with the intention to omit surgery for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of postoperative upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in patients preoperatively diagnosed with DCIS. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with DCIS diagnosed through biopsy between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014, from 16 institutions. Clinical, radiological, and histological variables were collected from medical records. Results We identified 2,293 patients diagnosed with DCIS through biopsy, including 1,663 DCIS (72.5%) cases and 630 IDC (27.5%) cases. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a palpable mass (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–2.6), mammography findings (≥ category 4; OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.6), mass formations on ultrasonography (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.5), and tumor size on MRI (> 20 mm; OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2–2.4) were independent predictors of IDC. Among patients with a tumor size on MRI of ≤ 20 mm, the possibility of postoperative upstaging to IDC was 22.1%. Among the 258 patients with non-palpable mass, nuclear grade 1/2, and positive for estrogen receptor, the possibility was 18.1%, even if the upper limit of the tumor size on MRI was raised to ≤ 40 mm. Conclusion We identified four independent predictive factors of upstaging to IDC after surgery among patients with DCIS diagnosed by biopsy. The combined use of various predictors of IDC reduces the possibility of postoperative upstaging to IDC, even if the tumor size on MRI is larger than 20 mm.


Radiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 241 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vidya R. Pai ◽  
Nancy E. Gregory ◽  
Ann E. Swinford ◽  
Murray Rebner

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 872-875
Author(s):  
Hélène Dano ◽  
Christine Galant ◽  
Maude Coyette ◽  
Mieke R. Van Bockstal

With the advent of screening mammography, the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased. DCIS accounts for around 20% of breast cancers diagnosed at present. The histiocytoid variant of clear cell DCIS is a rare subtype of DCIS, characterized by epithelial cells with a clear and foamy cytoplasm. Histiocytoid DCIS serves as a potential diagnostic pitfall, since it can be easily mistaken for intraductal collections of foamy macrophages. In this article, we report a particular case of biphasic DCIS, characterized by an extensive histiocytoid-type clear cell component and a conventional “non-clear” cell component. Both components presented with HER2 protein overexpression. We discuss the diagnostic challenge and differential diagnosis of clear cell DCIS, as well as the role of HER2 overexpression in DCIS pathogenesis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaer Khoury ◽  
Nashwan Jabbour ◽  
Xuan Peng ◽  
Li Yan ◽  
Marie Quinn

Abstract Objectives Women with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), unlike those with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), are denied eligibility for active surveillance clinical trials. Methods We applied the inclusion criteria of the Comparison of Operative to Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy (COMET) trial to the cases of women (n = 165) at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute who had a diagnosis of ADH, ADH bordering on DCIS, or low- to intermediate-grade DCIS on core biopsy taken during screening mammography. Upgrade of lesions to high risk was based on invasive carcinoma, high-grade DCIS, or DCIS with comedo necrosis. Results In total, nine (5.5%) lesions were upgraded: two (1.7%) reported ADH, one (5.9%) reported ADH bordering on DCIS, and six (19.4%) reported DCIS (P = .002); and two (1.6%) reclassified ADH vs seven (17.1%) reclassified DCIS (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, only increased number of foci had the potential to predict high risk (odds ratio: 1.39; P = .06). Conclusions We conclude that ADH and ADH bordering on DCIS have lower upgrade rates than DCIS. We recommend opening an active surveillance clinical trial for women with these diagnoses.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Sevilay Altintas ◽  
Manon T. Huizing ◽  
Eric Van Marck ◽  
Jan B. Vermorken ◽  
Wiebren A. Tjalma

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a heterogenous group of lesions with variable malignant potential. Although it is clearly pre-invasive, not all lesions progress to an invasive malignant disease. The significant increase in the frequency of diagnosis is the result of both widespread use of screening mammography and better recognition among pathologists. Treatment is controversial, but for several decades total mastectomy has been considered as the appropriate treatment. The tendency to be less aggressive in terms of surgery has followed the pattern of events observed in the treatment of invasive breast carcinomas. More recently, it has become clear that breastconserving procedures could be applied and selected on the basis of diagnostics and risk factors. When all patients with DCIS are considered, the overall mortality is extremely low, only about 1–2%. On the other hand, breast-conserving surgery is only curative in 75–85%; 50% of the local recurrences have proven to be invasive with a mortality rate of 12–15%. There is no place for axillary node dissection, adjuvant hormonal treatment or chemotherapy in the treatment. Important factors in predicting local recurrence are age, family history, nuclear grade, comedo-type necrosis, tumor size and margin width. With the addition of radiation therapy to excisional surgery, there is a 50% reduction in the overall local recurrence rate. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI), recently updated, is a tool that quantifies measurable prognostic factors that can be used in the decision-making process of treatment. Recent data from large cohort studies and randomized trials have emerged to guide treatment. DCIS is now understood to have diverse malignant potential and it is unlikely that there will be a single treatment for this wide range of lesions. Advances in molecular biology and gene expression profiling of human breast tumors have been providing important insights into the relationship between DCIS and invasive breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document