Data-driven quality improvement in an oncology patient-centered medical home.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 54-54
Author(s):  
John David Sprandio ◽  
Maureen Lowry ◽  
Brian Flounders ◽  
Susan Higman Tofani

54 Background: In a 2012 abstract, Data driven transformation for an Oncology Patient-Centered Medical Home, Consultants in Medical Oncology (CMOH) demonstrated that standardized processes and enhanced IT capabilities (IRIS software app) provided a rapid learning system for the practice. Iris aggregated data became the basis for Quality Improvement Projects (QIPs) allowing CMOH to continue to improve in quality and cost measures. Deviation from performance trend is readily identifiable, providing operational direction. Methods: A review of 2012 data identified an increase in the rate of hospitalizations, initiating a QIP. We identified inconsistent processes in Telephone Triage Symptom Management at one of the three practice locations. It was determined that symptom calls in the early to mid afternoon were being directed to the ER, and a higher percentage of these evaluations resulted in admissions. Steps to restructure roles and internal processes and reinforced training followed, resulting in improvement. Results: After analysis of site specific performance, we centralized Telephone Triage services to reduce variability in execution. We addressed staffing issues, streamlined nursing and physician education around Triage related processes, revised algorithms, and improved education materials to enhance patient engagement. This resulted in resetting our trend in ER utilization and admissions, increasing the number of calls into the telephone triage service, increasing the percentage of symptoms managed at home and decreasing the number of office visits within 24 hours. Conclusions: Aggregated real-time data provides the tools to rapidly identify opportunities for improvement and conduct QIPs to enhance the quality and value of delivered services. Supportive software apps like Iris are foundational for practice transformation to future value-based cancer care models. [Table: see text]

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Sprandio ◽  
Brian P. Flounders ◽  
Maureen Lowry ◽  
Susan Tofani

As the use of EMR systems increases, new standardized quality measures that incorporate patient- and payer-centric outcomes need to be developed, and data must be collected in a manner that will not distract the physician-led care team from the delivery of quality patient care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 667-672.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha Wells ◽  
Stuart Rockafellow ◽  
Marcy Holler ◽  
Antoinette B. Coe ◽  
Anne Yoo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 285-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
John David Sprandio ◽  
Brian Flounders ◽  
Maureen R. Lowry ◽  
Susan Higman Tofani

285 Background: Consultants in Medical Oncology and Hematology (CMOH) implemented an EMR in 2003. It fell short in the compilation and presentation of meaningful data upon which to base clinical decisions. CMOH created a new workflow and effectively integrated the EMR with a practice-developed clinical decision support software (CDSS) called Iris. Methods: A project team outlined the data sources required in making a clinical decision and reviewed staff workflow. Within six months, they developed a system for displaying data from internal and external sources into a single scrollable screen for use by the physician at the point of care. Results: Iris promotes a rapid-learning cycle that results in 1) improved adherence to NCCN guidelines; 2) enhanced access and continuity of symptom management; 3) enhanced communication, tracking, and coordination of care; 4) reduction in ER utilization/hospital admissions; 5) a performance status driven approach to end of life care; 6) a systematic measurement of physician performance. This approach enabled CMOH to meet the NCQA’s criteria for level III Patient-Centered Medical Home in 2010. Conclusions: Implementation of EMRs alone does not improve health care delivery. Rather, it is the merger of clinical operations workflow and technology infrastructure delivering consumable data to providers that drives quality improvements and enhancements to the value of cancer care. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Han ◽  
Sarah Hudson Scholle ◽  
Suzanne Morton ◽  
Christine Bechtel ◽  
Rodger Kessler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document