Duration of androgen deprivation therapy in high risk prostate cancer: Final results of a randomized phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5008-5008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdenour Nabid ◽  
Marie-Pierre Garant ◽  
André-Guy Martin ◽  
Jean-Paul Bahary ◽  
Celine Lemaire ◽  
...  

5008 Background: Long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). However, the optimal duration of ADT is not yet defined. The aim of this randomized trial (Clinical Trials.gov, #NCT00223171) was to compare outcomes of RT combined with either 36 or 18 months of ADT. Methods: Patients with HRPC were randomized to pelvic and prostate RT combined with 36 (arm 1) or 18 months (arm 2) of ADT. Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were primary end points. OS rates were compared with Cox Regression model and QoL data were analyzed through mixed linear model. Results: 630 patients were randomized, 310 to arm 1 and 320 to arm 2. With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 290 patients had died (147 arm 1 vs. 143 arm 2). The 10-year OS rate was 62.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.4%, 67.8%) for arm 1 and 62.0% (95% CI 56.1%, 67.3%) for arm 2 (p = 0.8412) with a global hazard ratio (HR) of 1.024 (95% CI 0.813-1.289, p = 0.8411). QoL analysis showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in 6 scales and 13 items favoring 18 months ADT with two of them presenting a clinically relevant difference in mean scores of ≥10 points. Conclusions: In HRPC, ADT combined with RT can be safely reduced from 36 to 18 months without compromising outcomes or QoL. 18 months of ADT represents a new standard of care in HRPC. Funded by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals Clinical trial information: NCT00223171.

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdenour Nabid ◽  
Nathalie Carrier ◽  
André-Guy Martin ◽  
Jean-Paul Bahary ◽  
Céline Lemaire ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Vinayak Muralidhar ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Lillian Werner ◽  
Mari Nakabayashi ◽  
Carolyn Evan ◽  
...  

33 Background: We wished to evaluate the incidence and predictors of the use of long-term (2-3 years) vs. shorter-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in radiation-treated men with high-risk prostate cancer. Methods: We identified 302 patients from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute patient registry diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer (T3a or PSA > 20 ng/mL or Gleason score 8-10) between 1993 and 2015. We assessed the intended duration of ADT and used multivariable Cox regression to evaluate predictors of receiving shorter-course ADT than recommended by guidelines (< 2 years). Results: The course of ADT intended by physicians increased following the 2009 publication of trials showing the superiority of 2-3 years versus 4-6 months of ADT, with 43.5% intending ≥ 2 years before vs. 61.4% after (p=0.014). Starting in 2010, 49.4% of patients actually received less than 2 years of ADT. The most common reasons for receipt of shorter-course ADT were intolerance of ADT side effects, patient comorbidity/age, the presence of T3a on MRI only as the sole high-risk feature, or participation in a clinical trial. ACE-27 moderate to severe comorbidity (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]=2.94), Gleason score less than 8 (AHR=5.66), and PSA < 20 ng/mL (AHR=4.19) all predicted receipt of shorter-course ADT (p<0.05 in all cases). Conclusions: In a tertiary-care setting, rates of long-course ADT for high-risk disease have increased since the 2008/2009 trials supporting its use. However, approximately half of patients continued to receive shorter-course ADT, often due to intolerance of side effects, underlying comorbidity, or physician judgment about the aggressiveness of the disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 6802-6811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Himisha Beltran ◽  
Alexander W. Wyatt ◽  
Edmund C. Chedgy ◽  
Adam Donoghue ◽  
Matti Annala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document