Entral feeding tube insertion after esophagectomy: Technique via transgastric conduit or transduodenal.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
Takashi Ogata ◽  
Tetsushi Nakajima ◽  
Kazuki Kano ◽  
Yukio Maezawa ◽  
Kousuke Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Internal Hernia ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Round Ligament ◽  
Insertion Point ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Gastric Tube Reconstruction

210 Background: We always used early enteral feeding after esophagectomy as perioperative management. The common procedure for feeding tube insertion is jejunostomy, but sometimes complication such as internal hernia was occurred. In case of retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction, we usually inserted feeding tube through gastric conduit. But in case of posterior mediastinal gastric tube reconstruction, this procedure was not available because of the distance between abdominal wall and gastric tube. So we have developed the new procedure for feeding tube insertion using the mobilized round ligament of liver. Methods: The aims of the study is to clarify the safety of these procedures. In case of retrosternal reconstruction, we usually inserted feeding tube from prepylorus of gastric conduit, and feeding tube was delivered through pyloric ring to 3rd portion of duodenum(Procedure A). Insertion point of the tube was always close to abdominal wall, and easy to be guided to extra-abdomen. On the other hand, in case of posterior reconstruction, we used the new procedure as below(Procedure B). At first, the round ligament of liver was cut at the liver edge. Next, feeding tube was inserted 15~20cm from anterior wall of 2nd portion of duodenum with Witzel suture fixation. After that, feeding tube was led to outside of the abdominal wall through in the mobilized round ligament. The cut edge of round ligament was fixed to the duodenum wall with 4-point suture at tube insertion point, and finally feeding tube completely surrounded by round ligament without direct exposure to the abdominal cavity. And to prevent internal hernia, the space between abdominal wall and mobilized round ligament was covered by omental fat. Results: From January 2012 to December 2014, 126 cases were inserted by procedure A, and from June 2015 to February 2016, 35 cases were done by procedure B. There was no trouble derived from the feeding tube insertion such as intra-operative bleeding, leakage of digestive juice, infectious complication, ileus, and there was no trouble in removal at outpatients in both procedures. Conclusions: Both procedures were safe, so we can manage the feeding tube insertion route by the reconstruction route after esophagectomy.

FA05.03: EFFECT OF EPHEDRINE ON GASTRIC CONDUIT PERFUSION MEASURED BY LASER SPECKLE CONTRAST IMAGING (LSCO) AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE IN-VIVO COHORT STUDY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 10-10
Author(s):  
Sanne Jansen ◽  
Daniel De Bruin ◽  
Simon Strackee ◽  
Mark I Van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
Ton Van Leeuwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Laser Speckle ◽  
Contrast Imaging ◽  
Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging ◽  
Speckle Contrast ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Gastric Tube Reconstruction

Abstract Background Compromised perfusion due to ligation of arteries and veins in esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction often (5–20%) results in necrosis and anastomotic leakage, which relate to high morbidity and mortality (3–4%). Ephedrine is used widely in anesthesia to treat intra-operative hypotension and may improve perfusion by the increase of cardiac output (CO) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). This study tests the effect of ephedrine on perfusion of the future anastomotic site of the gastric conduit, measured by Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI). Methods This prospective, observational, in-vivo pilot study includes 26 patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction from October 2015 to June 2016 in the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam). Perfusion of the gastric conduit was measured with LSCI directly after reconstruction and after an increase of MAP by ephedrine 5 mg. Perfusion was quantified in flux (LSPU) in four perfusion locations, from good perfusion (base of the gastric tube) towards decreased perfusion (fundus). Intra-patient differences before and after ephedrine in terms flux were statistically tested for significance with a paired t-test. Results LSCI was feasible to image gastric microcirculation in all patients. Flux (LSPU) was significantly higher in the base of the gastric tube (791 ± 442) compared to the fundus (328 ± 187) (P < 0.001). After administration of ephedrine, flux increased significantly in the fundus (P < 0·05) measured intra-patients. Three patients developed anastomotic leakage. In these patients, the difference between measured flux in the fundus compared to the base of the gastric tube was high. Conclusion This study presents the effect of ephedrine on perfusion of the gastric tissue measured with LSCI in terms of flux (LSPU) after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We show a small but significant difference between flux measured before and after administration of ephedrine in the future anastomotic tissue (313 ± 178 vs. 397 ± 290). We also show a significant decrease of flux towards the fundus. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Association between Level of Anastomosis and Reflux Esophagitis following Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-145
Author(s):  
M. Sakai ◽  
R. Muranushi ◽  
H. Saito ◽  
K. Kuriyama ◽  
T. Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reflux Esophagitis ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Gastric Tube Reconstruction

scholarly journals Proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction or jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer: which offers better short-term surgical outcomes?

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Yan Ma ◽  
Guiting Liu ◽  
Ming Fang ◽  
Yingwei Xue
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Reflux Esophagitis ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Proximal Gastrectomy ◽  
Jejunal Interposition ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Jejunal Interposition Reconstruction ◽  
Upper Third ◽  
Gastric Tube Reconstruction

Abstract Objective Proximal gastrectomy acts as a function-preserving operation for upper-third gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer. Methods A retrospective review of 301 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (JI) or gastric tube (GT) at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2007 and December 2016 was performed. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Visick grade were used to evaluate postgastrectomy syndromes. Gastrointestinal fiberoscopy was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification system. Results The JI group had a longer operation time than the GT group (220 ± 52 vs 182 ± 50 min), but no significant difference in blood loss was noted. Compared to the GT group, the Visick grade and GSRS score were significantly higher. Reflux esophagitis was significantly increased in the GT group compared with the JI group. Conclusion Proximal gastrectomy is well tolerated with excellent short-term outcomes in patients with upper-third gastric cancer. Compared with GT construction, JI construction has clear functional advantages and may provide better quality of life for patients with upper-third gastric cancer.

scholarly journals Comparative study of inflammatory response and adhesions formation after fixation of different meshes for inguinal hernia repair in rabbits

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Goldenberg ◽  
Jacques Matone ◽  
Wagner Marcondes ◽  
Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella ◽  
José Francisco de Mattos Farah
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Peritoneal Cavity ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Preperitoneal Space ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
The Right

PURPOSE: Compare, in a rabbit model, the inflammatory response and adhesions formation following surgical fixation of polypropilene and Vypro mesh in the inguinal preperitoneal space. METHODS: Fourteen male New Zealand rabbits, weighing between 2.000 to 2.500 g were used. A midline incision was made and the peritoneal cavity was exposed. The 2,0X1,0 cm polypropylene mesh was fixed in the left flank and secured to the margins with 3-0 prolene in a separate pattern. In the right flank, a 2,0X1,0 cm Vypro II mesh was sewn in the same way. After the post surgical period, the animals were again anesthetized and underwent laparoscopic approach, in order to identify and evaluate adhesions degree. Both fixed prosthesis were excised bilaterally with the abdominal wall segment, including peritoneum, aponeurosis and muscle and sent to a pathologist RESULTS: Operative time ranged from 15 to 25 minutes and no difficulties in applying the mesh were found. From the 14 polypropylene meshes fixed to the intact peritoneum, 11 had adhesions to the abdominal cavity (78,6%). Concerning Vypro mesh, 12 animals developed adhesions from the 14 with mesh fixation (85,7%). Histological examination of tissues harvested revealed fibroblasts, collagen, macrophages and lymphocytes between the threads of the mesh. CONCLUSION: Polypropylene and Vypro mesh, when implanted in the peritoneal cavity of rabbits provoke similar amount of adhesions. Vypro mesh tissues had higher fibrosis resulting in better mesh incorporation to the abdominal wall.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document