Palliative care intervention and aggressive care at end-of-life in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 244-244
Author(s):  
Caitlin Lees ◽  
Wilma M Hopman ◽  
Tallal Younis ◽  
Nathan William Dana Lamond ◽  
Ravi Ramjeesingh

244 Background: Unresectable pancreatic cancer carries one of the worst prognoses amongst malignancies. For these patients, their treatment at end-of-life represents some of the most expensive care they will receive. Resource-intensive care at the end of life contrasts with the preferences of many patients and their family members. We have examined the intensity of end-of-life care in patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma using a previously published aggressiveness score. Methods: The surveillance and epidemiology unit of the program of care for cancer identified all patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Nova Scotia between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. Charts were then reviewed for demographic data, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and consultation with Palliative Care. An aggressiveness of end-of-life care score, which has been previously described in the literature, was employed. Briefly, scores ranged from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing more aggressive care. One point was assigned for each of the following events in the last 30 days of life: two or more emergency department visits, two or more hospitalizations, 14 or more inpatient days, chemotherapy, intensive care unit admission, death in hospital. One-way ANOVA was then performed to determine factors associated with more aggressive end-of-life care. Results: In total, 264 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean aggressiveness of end-of-life care was 0.92 (95% CI 0.8 – 1.03). On average, patients seen by Palliative Care at any point in their illness had less aggressive treatment than those never seen by Palliative Care (0.83 vs 1.38, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer, less aggressive end-of-life care Further work, including prospective studies, is needed to identify a true association between palliative care intervention and less aggressive care at end-of-life. Such an association could lead to benefits for the patient and reduce costly resource-intensive care.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lees ◽  
S. Weerasinghe ◽  
N. Lamond ◽  
T. Younis ◽  
Ravi Ramjeesingh

Background Palliative care (pc) consultation has been associated with less aggressive care at end of life in a number of malignancies, but the effect of the consultation timing has not yet been fully characterized. For patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (upcc), aggressive and resource-intensive treatment at the end of life can be costly, but not necessarily of better quality. In the present study, we investigated the association, if any, between the timing of specialist pc consultation and indicators of aggressive care at end of life in patients with upcc.Methods This retrospective cohort study examined the potential effect of the timing of specialist pc consultation on key indicators of aggressive care at end of life in all patients diagnosed with upcc in Nova Scotia between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. Statistical analysis included univariable and multivariable logistic regression.Results In the 365 patients identified for inclusion in the study, specialist pc consultation was found to be associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life; however, the timing of the consultation was not significant. Residency in an urban area was associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life. We observed no association between experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life and consultation with medical oncology or radiation oncology.Conclusions Regardless of timing, specialist pc consultation was associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life. That finding provides further evidence to support the integral role of pc in managing patients with a life-limiting malignancy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 801-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley Widger ◽  
Rinku Sutradhar ◽  
Adam Rapoport ◽  
Christina Vadeboncoeur ◽  
Shayna Zelcer ◽  
...  

Purpose The impact of specialized pediatric palliative care (SPPC) teams on patterns of end-of-life care is unknown. We sought to determine (1) which children with cancer access SPPC and (2) the impact of accessing SPPC on the risk of experiencing high-intensity end-of-life care (intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death). Methods Using a provincial childhood cancer registry, we assembled a retrospective cohort of Ontario children with cancer who died between 2000 and 2012 and received care through pediatric institutions with an SPPC team. Patients were linked to population-based administrative data capturing inpatient, outpatient, and emergency visits. Children were classified as having SPPC, general palliative care, or no palliative care on the basis of SPPC clinical databases, physician billing codes, or inpatient diagnosis codes. Results Of the 572 children, 166 (29%) received care from an SPPC team for at least 30 days before death, and 100 (17.5%) received general palliative care. SPPC involvement was significantly less likely for children with hematologic cancers (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.4), living in the lowest income areas (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8), and living further from the treatment center (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.5). SPPC was associated with a five-fold decrease in odds of intensive care unit admission (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4), whereas general palliative care had no impact. Similar associations were seen with all secondary indicators. Conclusion When available, SPPC, but not general palliative care, is associated with lower intensity care at the end of life for children with cancer. However, access remains uneven. These results provide the strongest evidence to date supporting the creation of SPPC teams.


Author(s):  
Raymond W. Jang ◽  
Monika K. Krzyzanowska ◽  
Camilla Zimmermann ◽  
Nathan Taback ◽  
Shabbir M. H. Alibhai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document