scholarly journals Palliative care consultation and aggressive care at end of life in unresectable pancreatic cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lees ◽  
S. Weerasinghe ◽  
N. Lamond ◽  
T. Younis ◽  
Ravi Ramjeesingh
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Integral Role ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Aggressive Care ◽  
Key Indicators

Background Palliative care (pc) consultation has been associated with less aggressive care at end of life in a number of malignancies, but the effect of the consultation timing has not yet been fully characterized. For patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (upcc), aggressive and resource-intensive treatment at the end of life can be costly, but not necessarily of better quality. In the present study, we investigated the association, if any, between the timing of specialist pc consultation and indicators of aggressive care at end of life in patients with upcc.Methods This retrospective cohort study examined the potential effect of the timing of specialist pc consultation on key indicators of aggressive care at end of life in all patients diagnosed with upcc in Nova Scotia between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015. Statistical analysis included univariable and multivariable logistic regression.Results In the 365 patients identified for inclusion in the study, specialist pc consultation was found to be associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life; however, the timing of the consultation was not significant. Residency in an urban area was associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life. We observed no association between experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life and consultation with medical oncology or radiation oncology.Conclusions Regardless of timing, specialist pc consultation was associated with decreased odds of experiencing an indicator of aggressive care at end of life. That finding provides further evidence to support the integral role of pc in managing patients with a life-limiting malignancy.

The effect of early palliative care consultation for survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 131-131
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Kosugi ◽  
Fumio Omata ◽  
Yoshiyuki Fujita ◽  
Akitoshi Hayashi
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Ajcc Stage ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Basic Characteristics

131 Background: Additional early palliative care consultation (EPCC) on standard oncology care (SOC) was reported to prolong survival of patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer by one randomized controlled trial. However, its survival benefits for the patients with other advanced cancer have not fully been investigated yet. Pancreatic cancer is one of neoplastic diseases which seldom can be diagnosed in early stage and it is important to know the effectiveness of EPCC. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of EPCC for survival of unresectable pancreatic cancer(UPC). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in tertiary referral hospital in Tokyo, Japan. 98 patients were diagnosed with UPC between Jan 2004 and February 2007. Candidate variable as predictors for survival analysis included basic characteristics of patients such as age and gender, EPCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), ECOG performance status (PS), and chemotherapy. EPCC was defined as referral to board certified palliative care physician within 30 days after initial diagnosis of UPC. Patients were classified to EPCC with SOC and SOC only group. Bivariate analyses was conducted to compare EPCC with SOC and SOC group. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Cox proportional hazard model was applied for multivariate analysis. Results: The basic characteristics of patients are described in table. Median estimates of survival [95%CI] were 64 days[21-99] in the group of EPCC with SOC, and 132 days [69-174] in the group of SOC only (P=0.0065, Log-rank test). Adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI] of AJCC stage, chemotherapy, and EPCC was 1.82 [1.02-3.49], 0.41 [0.25-0.70], 2.02 [1.03-3.70], respectively. Conclusions: EPCC may be a significantly poor prognostic factor in the patients with UPC. [Table: see text]

Palliative care intervention and aggressive care at end-of-life in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 244-244
Author(s):  
Caitlin Lees ◽  
Wilma M Hopman ◽  
Tallal Younis ◽  
Nathan William Dana Lamond ◽  
Ravi Ramjeesingh
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Intervention ◽  
Aggressive Care

244 Background: Unresectable pancreatic cancer carries one of the worst prognoses amongst malignancies. For these patients, their treatment at end-of-life represents some of the most expensive care they will receive. Resource-intensive care at the end of life contrasts with the preferences of many patients and their family members. We have examined the intensity of end-of-life care in patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma using a previously published aggressiveness score. Methods: The surveillance and epidemiology unit of the program of care for cancer identified all patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Nova Scotia between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. Charts were then reviewed for demographic data, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and consultation with Palliative Care. An aggressiveness of end-of-life care score, which has been previously described in the literature, was employed. Briefly, scores ranged from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing more aggressive care. One point was assigned for each of the following events in the last 30 days of life: two or more emergency department visits, two or more hospitalizations, 14 or more inpatient days, chemotherapy, intensive care unit admission, death in hospital. One-way ANOVA was then performed to determine factors associated with more aggressive end-of-life care. Results: In total, 264 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean aggressiveness of end-of-life care was 0.92 (95% CI 0.8 – 1.03). On average, patients seen by Palliative Care at any point in their illness had less aggressive treatment than those never seen by Palliative Care (0.83 vs 1.38, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer, less aggressive end-of-life care Further work, including prospective studies, is needed to identify a true association between palliative care intervention and less aggressive care at end-of-life. Such an association could lead to benefits for the patient and reduce costly resource-intensive care.

scholarly journals When Does Early Palliative Care Influence Aggressive Care At The End of Life?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mellar P Davis ◽  
Erin vanenkevort ◽  
Alexander Elder ◽  
Amanda Young ◽  
Irina Correa Ordonez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
P Value ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Aggressive Care ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

Abstract Background Early palliative care improves patient quality of life and influences cancer care. The time frame of early has not been established. Eight quality measures reflect aggressive care at the end of life. We retrospectively reviewed patients who died with cancer between January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019, and compared the timing of palliative care consultation, advance directives (AD), and home palliative care with aggressive care at the end of life (ACEOL). Methods Patients without ACEOL indicators were compared to patients with one or more than one indicator of ACEOL. The proportion of patients who received palliative care, completed AD, and the timing of palliative care and AD (less than 30 days, 60–90 days, and greater than 90 days prior to death) was compared for patients who had ACEOL versus those who did not. Chi-square analysis was used for categorical data, one-way ANOVA for continuous variables, and odds ratio (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) was reported as a measure of effect size. A p-value </= 0.05 was considered significant. Results 1727 patients died, 46% were female, and the mean age was 69 (SD 11.91). 71% had a palliative care consult, 26% completed AD, 888 (51.4%) had at least one indicator of ACEOL. AD completed at any time reduced ACEOL (OR 0.80, 95%CI 0.64–0.99). Palliative care was associated with a greater risk of ACEOL at 30 days (OR 5.32, 95% CI 3.94–7.18) and between 30 and 90 days (OR 1.39,95% CI 1.07–1.80), but dramatically reduced ACEOL at > 90 days (OR 0.46,95% CI 0.38–0.57).The most common indicator of ACEOL was new chemotherapy within 30 days of death, in 571 of 888 (64%) of patients experiencing ACEOL. Discussion AD reduce ACEOL and often reflect goals of care and end-of-life discussions in the transition of care away from tumor directed therapy. Palliative care paradoxically in our experience is associated with greater ACEOL in the first 90 days since consultation occurs late in the course of illness and the focus is on crisis management in patients who are frequently utilizing the health care system. If palliative care consultation occurs greater than 90 days before death, there is the opportunity for both aggressive symptom management and end of life discussions which may influence aggressive care at the end of life. Conclusions An initial palliative care consult greater than 90 days before death and ADs completed at any time during the disease trajectory significantly impacts care at the end of life. Both should become quality metrics for good cancer care.

scholarly journals Effect of Palliative Care on Aggressiveness of End-of-Life Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e760-e769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Triplett ◽  
Wendi G. LeBrett ◽  
Alex K. Bryant ◽  
Andrew R. Bruggeman ◽  
Rayna K. Matsuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Invasive Procedures ◽  
Chemotherapy Administration ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation

Purpose: Palliative care’s role in oncology has expanded, but its effect on aggressiveness of care at the end of life has not been characterized at the population level. Methods: This matched retrospective cohort study examined the effect of an encounter with palliative care on health-care use at the end of life among 6,580 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced prostate, breast, lung, or colorectal cancer. We compared health-care use before and after palliative care consultation to a matched nonpalliative care cohort. Results: The palliative care cohort had higher rates of health-care use in the 30 days before palliative care consultation compared with the nonpalliative cohort, with higher rates of hospitalization (risk ratio [RR], 3.33; 95% CI, 2.87 to 3.85), invasive procedures (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.62 to 1.88), and chemotherapy administration (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45 to 1.78). The opposite pattern emerged in the interval from palliative care consultation through death, where the palliative care cohort had lower rates of hospitalization (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65), invasive procedures (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.59), and chemotherapy administration (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.53). Patients with earlier palliative care consultation in their disease course had larger absolute reductions in health-care use compared with those with palliative care consultation closer to the end of life. Conclusion: This population-based study found that palliative care substantially decreased health-care use among Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer. Given the increasing number of elderly patients with advanced cancer, this study emphasizes the importance of early integration of palliative care alongside standard oncologic care.

mHOMR: a feasibility study of an automated system for identifying inpatients having an elevated risk of 1-year mortality

2019 ◽  
pp. bmjqs-2018-009285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pete Wegier ◽  
Ellen Koo ◽  
Shahin Ansari ◽  
Daniel Kobewka ◽  
Erin O'Connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Elevated Risk ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation

ObjectiveThe need for clinical staff to reliably identify patients with a shortened life expectancy is an obstacle to improving palliative and end-of-life care. We developed and evaluated the feasibility of an automated tool to identify patients with a high risk of death in the next year to prompt treating physicians to consider a palliative approach and reduce the identification burden faced by clinical staff.MethodsTwo-phase feasibility study conducted at two quaternary healthcare facilities in Toronto, Canada. We modified the Hospitalised-patient One-year Mortality Risk (HOMR) score, which identifies patients having an elevated 1-year mortality risk, to use only data available at the time of admission. An application prompted the admitting team when patients had an elevated mortality risk and suggested a palliative approach. The incidences of goals of care discussions and/or palliative care consultation were abstracted from medical records.ResultsOur model (C-statistic=0.89) was found to be similarly accurate to the original HOMR score and identified 15.8% and 12.2% of admitted patients at Sites 1 and 2, respectively. Of 400 patients included, the most common indications for admission included a frailty condition (219, 55%), chronic organ failure (91, 23%) and cancer (78, 20%). At Site 1 (integrated notification), patients with the notification were significantly more likely to have a discussion about goals of care and/or palliative care consultation (35% vs 20%, p = 0.016). At Site 2 (electronic mail), there was no significant difference (45% vs 53%, p = 0.322).ConclusionsOur application is an accurate, feasible and timely identification tool for patients at elevated risk of death in the next year and may be effective for improving palliative and end-of-life care.

Association of Palliative Care Consultation With Reducing Inpatient Chemotherapy Use in Elderly Patients With Cancer in Japan: Analysis Using a Nationwide Administrative Database

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 685-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoko Sano ◽  
Kiyohide Fushimi
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
National Database ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
The Impact

Background: The administration of chemotherapy at the end of life is considered an aggressive life-prolonging treatment. The use of unnecessarily aggressive therapy in elderly patients at the end of life is an important health-care concern. Objective: To explore the impact of palliative care consultation (PCC) on chemotherapy use in geriatric oncology inpatients in Japan by analyzing data from a national database. Methods: We conducted a multicenter cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years, registered in the Japan National Administrative Healthcare Database, who died with advanced (stage ≥3) lung, stomach, colorectal, liver, or breast cancer while hospitalized between April 2010 and March 2013. The relationship between PCC and chemotherapy use in the last 2 weeks of life was analyzed using χ2 and logistic regression analyses. Results: We included 26 012 patients in this analysis. The mean age was 75.74 ± 6.40 years, 68.1% were men, 81.8% had recurrent cancer, 29.5% had lung cancer, and 29.5% had stomach cancer. Of these, 3134 (12%) received PCC. Among individuals who received PCC, chemotherapy was administered to 46 patients (1.5%) and was not administered to 3088 patients (98.5%). Among those not receiving PCC, chemotherapy was administered to 909 patients (4%) and was not administered to the remaining 21 978 patients (96%; odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.48). The OR of chemotherapy use was higher in men, young–old, and patients with primary cancer. Conclusion: Palliative care consultation was associated with less chemotherapy use in elderly Japanese patients with cancer who died in the hospital setting.

scholarly journals Quality of End-of-Life Care for People with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Ontario: A Population-Based Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 3297-3315
Author(s):  
Catherine L. Goldie ◽  
Paul Nguyen ◽  
Andrew G. Robinson ◽  
Craig E. Goldie ◽  
Colleen E. Kircher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Aggressive Care ◽  
Eol Care

Ensuring high quality end of life (EOL) care is necessary for people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), given its high incidence, mortality and symptom burden. Aggressive EOL care can adversely affect the quality of life of NSCLC patients without providing meaningful oncologic benefit. Objectives: (1) To describe EOL health services quality indicators and timing of palliative care consultation provided to patients dying of NSCLC. (2) To examine associations between aggressive and supportive care and patient, disease and treatment characteristics. Methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study describes those who died of NSCLC in Ontario, Canada from 2009–2017. Socio-demographic, patient, disease and treatment characteristics as well as EOL health service quality and use of palliative care consultation were investigated. Multivariable logistic regression models examined factors associated with receiving aggressive or supportive care. Results: Aggressive care quality indicators were present in 50.3% and supportive care indicators in 60.3% of the cohort (N = 37,203). Aggressive care indicators decreased between 2009 and 2017 (57.4% to 45.3%) and increased for supportive care (54.2% to 67.5%). Benchmarks were not met by 2017 in 3 of 4 cases. Male sex and greater comorbidity were associated with more aggressive EOL care and less supportive care. Older age was negatively associated and rurality positively associated with aggressive care. No palliative care consultation occurred in 56.0%. Conclusions: While improvements in the use of supportive rather than aggressive care were noted, established Canadian benchmarks were not met. Moreover, there is variation in EOL quality between groups and use of earlier palliative care must improve.

The Optimal Delivery of Palliative Care (DRAFT)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Yoong ◽  
Peter Poon
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Excellent Care ◽  
Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

This study aimed to compare the effect of palliative care consultation teams with that of dedicated palliative care units on the quality of end-of-life care. This was a telephone-base survey conducted in 77 Veterans Affairs medical centers that had provided both models of care. Deceased patients from July 2008 to December 2009 were identified. A family member of the decedent was invited to participate in the survey which consisted of one global rating item and nine core items pertaining to patient’s end-of-life care. Families of patients who received care in a palliative care unit were more likely to report “excellent” care compared to families of those who received at least one palliative care consultation; families of those who received at least one palliative care consultation in turn where more likely to report “excellent” care compared to families of those who received usual care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document