Single-dose radiotherapy (SDRT) in the management of intermediate risk prostate cancer: Early results from a phase II randomized trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 128-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Greco ◽  
Nuno Pimentel ◽  
Oriol Pares ◽  
Vasco Louro ◽  
Zvi Y. Fuks
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Time Motion ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Patient Reported

128 Background: To report initial response, acute treatment-related toxicity and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) after 24Gy SDRT derived from a randomized Phase II study of patients with intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate (NCCN definition). Methods: Between November 2015 and December 2016, 30 hormone-naïve patients were enrolled in an IRB-approved prospectively randomized phase II study to receive either 45Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions (Hypo-SBRT) or 24Gy SDRT. Treatment was based on VMAT-IGRT with urethral sparing via a dose-painting technique and real-time motion management with beacon transponders. The PTV included the MR-delineated prostate gland and seminal vesicles with 2 mm margin. Precise PTV targeting and anatomical reproducibility was achieved via placement of an endorectal air-filled balloon (150 cc) and a Foley catheter. This setup also conferred organ motion mitigation, and online tracking ensured treatment delivery within the 2 mm PTV margin.. Genito-urinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity were graded according to the NCI CTCAE v.4, and QoL was assessed by EPIC and IPSS questionnaires. Tumor response was assessed biochemically (PSA) and by follow-up MRI at 3 months after treatment and at 6 months intervals thereafter. Results: With a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 11-24), no grade ≥2 acute GI or GU toxicities were observed in either group. There were no significant differences in mean EPIC scores in all domains. An initial 6% and 8% drop in the EPIC urinary domain score occurred in the hypo and SDRT arm respectively, returning to baselines by 3 months. . PSA reduction kinetics were similar between the two regimens, reaching ≤1 ng/mL by 18 months. Of note, all cases, regardless of treatment regimen, converted to non-detectable disease on MRI at 6 months. Patients in this trial will receive a planned 24 months post-treatment biopsy to validate treatment outcome. Conclusions: These early trial outcomes indicate that 24Gy SDRT can be consistently and safely delivered, yielding the same low acute toxicity as demonstrated with the hypo 5x9Gy schedule, and is associated with excellent QoL measures. Clinical trial information: NCT02570919.

Randomized phase II study of 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant imatinib for patients with intermediate- or high-risk GIST.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Kazuya Muguruma ◽  
Yukinori Kurokawa ◽  
Toshimasa Tsujinaka ◽  
Junya Fujita ◽  
Takuya Nakai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
P Value ◽  
Adjuvant Imatinib ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Ecog Ps

9 Background: The Z9001 study revealed adjuvant imatinib for 1 year significantly improved RFS in GIST patients (pts). The SSGXVIII study compared 3 years with 1 year of adjuvant imatinib for high risk GIST pts, but there was no study to evaluate shorter period of imatinib administration than 1 year. We conducted a randomized phase II study to compare 6 months (6-mo) with 12 months (12-mo) adjuvant imatinib for intermediate or high risk GIST pts. Methods: Inclusion criteria included ECOG-PS of 0 or 1, age between 20 and 79 years, and primary KIT-positive GIST with intermediate or high risk according to the Fletcher criteria. Pts were randomized assigned to the 6-mo or 12-mo treatment of imatinib 400 mg/day after complete resection. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The study was designed as a randomized screening trial to evaluate non-inferiority with margin of hazard ratio 1.67, 1-sided alpha 0.2 and power 0.8. Results: Ninety-two pts were randomly allocated the 6-mo group (n=45) or the 12-mo group (n=47) between Dec 2007 and Aug 2011, which was well balanced for baseline characteristics. One patient was ineligible due to non-GIST (desmoid) tumor at a central review. The proportions of pts completed their assigned adjuvant treatment were 80% in the 6-mo and 70% in the 12-mo group. The first interim analysis was conducted at Sep 2012 with the median follow-up time of 33 months. The 1- and 2-year RFS were 82% and 65% in the 6-mo group and 96% and 86% in the 12-mo group, respectively. Hazard ratio of recurrence was 1.81 (95%CI: 0.84-3.91), and the 2-sided log-rank p value was 0.12. Adjuvant imatinib was well tolerated, with one patient of Gr. 4 rash and no treatment-related death. Because of the lower efficacy of the 6-mo group than expected, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended the early release of first interim analysis results. Conclusions: Adjuvant Imatinib for 6-mo was inferior in efficacy to that for 12-mo in terms of RFS. Shortening of the adjuvant imatinib duration is not recommended for intermediate or high risk GIST pts. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000950.

Randomized phase II study of concurrent and sequential combinations of rituximab (R) plus CHOP (R-CHOP) in untreated indolent B-NHL: 7-year follow-up results

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8616-8616 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Itoh ◽  
T. Igarashi ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
Y. Morishima ◽  
T. Hotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

Quattro-II study: A multicenter randomized phase II study comparing capoxiri plus bevacizumab with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as the first-line treatment.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS267-TPS267
Author(s):  
Akihito Tsuji ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Takeharu Yamanaka ◽  
Hideaki Bando ◽  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Patient Reported

TPS267 Background: The first-line FOLFOXIRI with Bevacizumab (BEV) is highly effective and regarded as one of standard-of-care treatments in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) despite a high incidence of adverse events (AEs) such as neutropenia and diarrhea. The AXEPT, Asian Phase III study showed CAPIRI+BEV [Capecitabine (CAP: 1600 mg/m2), Irinotecan (IRI: 200 mg/m2) and BEV (7.5 mg/m2)] q3wk was non-inferior to FOLFIRI+BEV in pts with the second-line mCRC, with a lower incidence hematologic toxicity favoring CAPIRI+BEV over FOLFIRI+BEV. Based on these, a reduced dose of CAP and IRI regimen in combination with Oxaliplatin (OX) and BEV, CAPOXIRI+BEV may be more feasible than FOLFOXIRI+BEV, without compromising efficacy. Methods: QUATTRO-II is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study. Key eligibility criteria are as follows; age ≥20 years, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1 (≥71 years age: PS 0), adequate organ function, and UGT1A1 single-heterozygous (UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28) or wild-type (*1/*1) genotype. Pts are randomized to either the recommended dose of CAPOXIRI+BEV or FOLFOXIRI+BEV (OX: 85 mg/m2, IRI: 165 mg/m2, l-leucovorin: 200 mg/m2, 5-FU: 3200 mg/m2), with the strata of RAS/ BRAF status, previous adjuvant OX, tumor sidedness, and UGT1A1 status. Induction triplet chemotherapy plus BEV treatments are administered for up to 4 months followed by fluoropyrimidine plus BEV maintenance. The recommended dose of CAPOXIRI+BEV will be determined as a safety-lead-in before moving forward to the phase II main part. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). The similarity of PFS between the two arms is evaluated by observing whether the point estimate of hazard ratio (HR) for PFS falls in between 0.80 and 1.25. Ensuring 70% probability that the observed HR will be “0.8<HR<1.25” under the assumption of the true HR of 1.0, a total of 100 patients will be needed with 3-year study period. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and patient-reported outcome (FACT/GOG-Ntx4). The enrollment started in October 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT04097444.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized phase II study of the deferasirox film-coated tablet in patients with transfusion-dependent anemias

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali T. Taher ◽  
Raffaella Origa ◽  
Silverio Perrotta ◽  
Alexandra Kouraklis ◽  
Giovan Battista Ruffo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Coated Tablet
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document