Maintenance Defactinib Versus Placebo After First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Merlin-Stratified Pleural Mesothelioma: COMMAND—A Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase II Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 790-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean A. Fennell ◽  
Paul Baas ◽  
Paul Taylor ◽  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
David Gilligan ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase has been shown to selectively kill mesothelioma cells that express low levels of moesin-ezrin-radixin-like protein (merlin). On this basis, we designed a randomized, phase II trial to investigate whether defactinib as maintenance therapy after standard first-line chemotherapy could improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). METHODS This global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients with advanced MPM and disease control after at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Patients were stratified for merlin and then randomly assigned (in a 1:1 fashion) to receive either oral defactinib or placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal occurred. The coprimary end points were PFS and overall survival (OS). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale for Mesothelioma tool. RESULTS Three hundred forty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive either defactinib (n = 173) or placebo (n = 171). The median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.6 months) for defactinib versus 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.2 months) for placebo. The median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 9.1 to 21 months) for defactinib versus 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 21.2 months) for placebo (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.4). Although shorter survival for both defactinib- and placebo-treated patients was observed, in the patients who had merlin-low MPM compared with the patients who had merlin-high MPM, there were no statistical differences in response rate, PFS, OS, or QoL between the treatment groups. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, and decreased appetite. CONCLUSION Neither PFS nor OS was improved by defactinib after first-line chemotherapy in patients with merlin-low MPM. Defactinib cannot be recommended as maintenance therapy for advanced MPM.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7135-7135
Author(s):  
S. Park ◽  
S. Bang ◽  
E. Cho ◽  
D. Shin ◽  
J. Lee

7135 Background: There has been increasing interest in the use of a weekly administration of docetaxel as a way of reducing its hematologic toxicity. The purpose of this randomized study is to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of docetaxel and cisplatin combination on two schedules in patients with previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Consenting patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC were randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, plus either weekly (35 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 15 of a 4-week cycle) or 3-weekly (75 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle) docetaxel, both for up to 6 cycles. Objectives of this randomized phase II trial were response, toxicity and quality of life (QOL; measured with EORTC QLQ-C30). With a two-stage phase II design, the required number of patients was 39 per each arm. Results: Of 85 patients accrued, 71 patients were evaluable for response and 83 for safety. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms: male (56 patients); median age (64 years); adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma (53/32); stage IIIB/IV/recurrent (12/63/10); ECOG performance status 0/1/2 (20/44/21). Median number of chemotherapy cycles was 3 (1–6) for both arms. Median dose intensities were docetaxel 88%, cisplatin 98% in weekly arm, and docetaxel 97%, cisplatin 98% in 3-weekly arm. The objective responses of weekly and 3-weekly arm were 38% (95% CI, 23–53) and 42% (95% CI, 27–57), respectively. There was significantly more grade 3/4 neutropenia (66% v 12%; P < .001) and febrile neutropenia (40% v 7%; P < .001) on 3-weekly arm but less grade 3/4 diarrhea (2% v 14%; P = .05) and severe skin/nail toxicity (5% v 29%; P = .003). No difference in the rates of treatment delay or dose reduction for both arms; however, 19% of day 15 docetaxel were omitted in weekly arm due to toxicity. Conclusions: Both weekly and 3-weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin appear to be active as first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC, with different safety profiles. Updated results and QOL data, including a prolonged follow-up, will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document