Open-label, multicenter, phase I study to assess safety and tolerability of adavosertib plus durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2562-2562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Judy Sing-Zan Wang ◽  
Esteban Rodrigo Imedio ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

2562 Background: Adavosertib (AZD1775; A) is a highly selective inhibitor of WEE1. This Phase I study (NCT02617277) investigated a range of doses and schedules for oral A plus IV durvalumab (DV), a human monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Four 28-day schedules (Sch) were evaluated with pts receiving DV 1500 mg on day (d) 1 of each schedule (Table). Patients continued treatment if they showed clinical benefit in the absence of any discontinuation criteria. Pts received A monotherapy for PK analysis prior to the start of combination therapy in Sch B, C (d –7 to –5) and D (d –9 to –5). MTD was determined using a 3+3 dose-escalation cohort design. Predefined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated during the first cycle of study treatment. Results: 54 pts received A (most common primary tumor sites: colon, 19%; lung, 13%; breast, 11%). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were fatigue (15%), diarrhea (11%) and nausea (9%). DLTs were nausea (n = 2) and diarrhea (n = 1). 7 pts (13%) had A-related SAEs, including reversible and confounded drug-induced liver injury (Sch B 125 mg and Sch C; 1 each). Disease control rate (DCR) for the total cohort was 36%. Preliminary PK at 150 mg BID suggests adequate coverage for cell kill activity and no drug–drug interaction. Conclusions: The MTD/RP2D was A 150 mg BID (3 d on, 4 d off; treatment d 15–17, 22–24) with DV 1500 mg (d 1 Q4W); safety profile was considered acceptable. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02617277. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of an IDO inhibitor (SHR9146) plus camrelizumab and in combination with/without apatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: Safety and efficacy analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3101-3101
Author(s):  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jinhua Xu ◽  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

3101 Background: IDO is an enzyme of interest in immuno-oncology because of the immunosuppressive effects that result from its role in tryptophan catabolism. Clinical trials of IDO inhibitors with immunotherapy are under active investigation. The addition of angiogenesis inhibitor may further enhance the anti-tumor immune responses. Here we report the safety and efficacy results of SHR9146 (IDO inhibitor) plus camrelizumab (PD-1 antibody) with/without apatinib (VEGFR-2 inhibitor) in patients (pts) with advanced solid cancers who failed standard antitumor therapies. Methods: This was an open-label, phase I study. Eligible puts would receive SHR9146 (escalated dose) plus camrelizumab (200 mg IV, q2w) alone (Cohort A) or in combination with apatinib (250 mg p.o. qd) (Cohort B). Each cohort was conducted according to a 3+3 dose escalation design. The starting dose of SHR9146 was 100mg bid, followed by 200, 400, 600 mg bid. The two primary endpoints were Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MDT). The secondary objective was to analysis the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and efficacy. Results: As of Oct 31, 2020, 23 pts have been enrolled (Cohort A:14, Cohort B: 9; median age: 54 years; median prior therapies: 2 lines;). Cohort A was escalating at 600mg, and Cohort B was escalating at 400mg. Two pts experienced DLTs: one DLT (G4 hypercalcemia) was observed at 600mg in Cohort A; the other DLT (G3 rash) was observed at 400mg in Cohort B. MDT was not reached and the study was still ongoing. In Cohort A, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 21.4% (3/14, all confirmed) and 42.9% (6/14). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with liver cancer (1/3), renal cancer (1/3), and cervix cancer (1/3). In Cohort B, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 33.3%(3/9, all confirmed) and 77.8%(7/9). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with SCLC (1/3), prostate cancer (1/3) and renal cancer (1/3). The incidence of pts with TRAEs and grade>=3 TRAEs were 91.3% (21/23) and 39.1% (9/23) respectively. The most common grade>=3 TRAEs were hypercalcemia (26.1%, 6/23), fatigue (17.4%, 4/23) and nausea (13.0%, 3/23). No fatal AEs were observed. G3 nausea, G3 lipase increased and G2 GGT increased resulted in SHR9146 dose reduction in 3 pts (Cohort A). Conclusions: SHR9146 plus camrelizumab in combination with/without apatinib demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with acceptable safety in pts with advanced solid tumors. Further study is needed to validate the efficacy and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03491631.

A first-in-human phase I study of CZ48, a lactone ring protected oral camptothecin, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2578-2578
Author(s):  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Montaser F. Shaheen ◽  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Steven Weitman ◽  
Beppino C. Giovanella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

2578 Background: CZ48, the 20-O-propionate ester of camptothecin (CPT), is a prodrug of CPT first described by Cao et al. in 1998. The side-chain is enzymatically cleaved in tissues. This gives rise to CPT, a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Methods: An open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CZ48 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Initial dosing started qd po 80mg/m2, advancing to 2560mg/m2 for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. Dosing was restarted in cohorts of 3 patients tid po at 18mg/m2 and escalated to 1g/m2on a 5 days on, 2 days off schedule for 28 days. Patients were prescreened by measuring CPT levels in plasma following a single pilot dose of CZ48. Dose was doubled until occurrence of at least Grade 2 adverse event, at which time 3+3 patient cohorts with a dose escalation of 33%-100% were implemented. DLT in 2/6 patients defined the MTD as the preceding DLT dose. PK parameters were measured prior to dosing, days 1-5, and day 28 of Cycle 1. Results: Poor absorption led to initial qd dosing reaching 2560mg/m2 with no signs of DLT. Subsequent tid dosing showed improved plasma levels and arrival at DLT. 34 patients were treated across 8 dose levels from 18 to 1000 mg/m2. The most frequent study-related adverse effects were cystitis, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. Grade IV toxicities observed were febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary PK data in the qd dosing showed poor correlation between dose and Cmax or AUC, while PK in tid patients showed slightly improved correlation between dose and both CZ48 AUC (Pearson's correlation coefficient ϱ=0.476, p<0.01) and CZ48 Cmax(ϱ =0.51, p<0.01). Evidence of clinical activity with stable disease ≥ 6 months was observed in 2 heavily pre-treated colon and one breast cancer patient. Conclusions: The MTD of tid po CZ48 administered 5 days on, 2 days off of 28-day cycle is between 750 mg/m2 and 576 mg/m2. Overall toxicity is relatively mild, with DLT being cystitis and myelosuppression. Even with tid dosing, PK values correlate poorly to dose. A new formulation with 3-5 fold higher preclinical absorption values is being considered for introduction into the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT00947739.

A phase I study of Debio 0932, an oral HSP90 inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3026-3026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Yann Berge ◽  
Hein van Ingen ◽  
Silvano Brienza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

3026 Background: Debio 0932 is an oral second-generation heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor that has shown extended tumor retention, blood-brain-barrier penetration, and promising anti-tumor activity both as monotherapy and combination against a broad range of tumors in pre-clinical models. Here we report the results of the dose escalation part of a phase I study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma (NCT01168752). Methods: This was an open-label, non-randomized, 3 + 3 dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Debio 0932 when given QD or Q2D during the first 30 days of treatment in patients with advanced solid tumours or lymphoma resistant to standard therapy. The starting dose in both treatment groups was 50mg. Doses were increased according to an algorithm based on observed toxicity and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics and results are summarized below. DLTs occurred at 1600mg in both dose groups. Adverse events (AE) were mostly CTCAE grade 1 or 2, with no apparent dose relationship. No ocular or cardiac toxicity was observed. The main reason for treatment withdrawal was progressive disease. Investigator-reported cases of SD and PR were observed. Conclusions: Debio 0932 mono-therapy was generally well tolerated and showed promising signs of efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. The recommended phase II dose, established at 1000mg QD, will be tested in an additional 30 patients in an ongoing expansion study. A phase I-II study of Debio 0932 in combination with standard of care in the first- and second-line treatment of NSCLC is planned. [Table: see text]

Open-label, sequential, ascending, multi-dose, phase I study of KW-2450 as monotherapy in subjects with previously treated advanced solid tumors.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3078-3078 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Dickson ◽  
P. LoRusso ◽  
E. A. Sausville ◽  
N. Rao ◽  
E. Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated

Phase I study of c-Met inhibitor ARQ197 in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2544-2544
Author(s):  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
Carla Kurkjian ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

2544 Background: C-Met protein is a receptor tyrosine kinase which is overexpressed or mutated in a variety of tumor types, causing cell proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis. Tivantinib is an orally bioavailable small molecule which binds to the c-Met protein. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tivantinib in combination with standard dose FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors for which FOLFOX (5-FU IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; 5-FU CIV 2400 mg/m2 day 1; Leucovorin IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; Oxaliplatin IV 85 mg/m2 day 1) would be appropriate chemotherapy received escalating doses of tivantinib BID (days 1-14) in a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), non-dose-limiting toxicities (NDLTs), safety, and preliminary efficacy were evaluated. Results: Fourteen patients (50% colorectal) were treated across 3 dose levels: 120 mg (n=3); 240 mg (n=5); 360 mg (n=6). No DLTs were observed until the 3rd dose level (treatment delay ≥3 days, secondary to grade 3 neutropenia). Common related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (36%; 0%), neutropenia (0%; 29%), nausea (14%; 14%), vomiting (14%; 14%), dehydration (14%; 7%), and thrombocytopenia (14%; 0%). To date, 7 patients have been evaluated for response including 4 (57%) with stable disease evident at the 8-week evaluation (CRC, 2 patients; unknown primary favoring CRC, 1 patient; esophageal, 1 patient) and 3 (21%) with disease progression. The 4 patients with stable disease are continuing on treatment; three (CRC and unknown primary) had received prior FOLFOX. Conclusions: The addition of tivantinib to standard therapy FOLFOX appears tolerated up to its recommended phase II monotherapy dose of 360 mg. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and a phase II study is proceeding with this regimen for the first line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01611857.

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 475-475
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Heat Shock Protein 90 ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

475 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90, with demonstrated activity in a variety of preclinical models. Further preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between inhibition of HSP90 and fluorouracil treatment (Burkitt et al. 2007). This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors for which capecitabine was an appropriate therapy received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 was administered twice daily for days 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 administered by intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 patients were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n = 6). There were no DLTs observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Common adverse events (all grades) included: diarrhea (61%), nausea (57%), fatigue (43%), hand-foot skin reaction (39%), anorexia (39%), vomiting (35%), rash (30%), and darkening vision (22%). Myelosuppression was uncommon, with no instances of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, and only 2 patients (9%) with grade 3/4 neutropenia (1 patient each). Of the 19 patients evaluable for response per RECIST 1.1, unconfirmed partial response (PR) was noted in 3 patients (13%; colorectal, 1; breast, 1; stomach, 1), with 1 additional confirmed PR (4%; colorectal); two of these had progressed on prior fluorouracil. Stable disease was noted in 8 patients (35%). Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

scholarly journals Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: A Study of the Pediatric Oncology Experimental Therapeutic Investigators' Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (30) ◽  
pp. 5102-5108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M. Trippett ◽  
Cynthia Herzog ◽  
James A. Whitlock ◽  
Johannes Wolff ◽  
John Kuttesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cns Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

Purpose To determine the dose of cetuximab that can be safely combined with irinotecan for treatment of pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods This open-label, phase I study enrolled patients ages 1 to 18 years with advanced refractory solid tumors, including tumors of the CNS. Patient cohorts by age group (children, ages 1 to 12 years; adolescents, ages 13 to 18 years) received escalating weekly doses of cetuximab (75, 150, 250 mg/m2) in a 3 + 3 design, plus irinotecan (16 or 20 mg/m2/d) for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks every 21 days. The primary end points were establishing the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RPIID), and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Preliminary safety and efficacy data were also collected. Results Twenty-seven children and 19 adolescents received a median of 7.1 and 6.0 weeks of cetuximab therapy, respectively. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly plus irinotecan 16 mg/m2/d (pediatric) or 20 mg/m2/d (adolescent) have been established as the MTD/RPIID. Dose-limiting toxicities included diarrhea and neutropenia. Mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) acneiform rash occurred in a majority of patients; no grade 3 to 4 rashes were observed. Cetuximab demonstrated dose-dependent clearance in both children and adolescents, similar to that in adults. There were two confirmed partial responses, both in patients with CNS tumors. Stable disease was achieved in 18 patients overall, including 10 patients with CNS tumors (38.5%). Conclusion The cetuximab/irinotecan combination can be given safely to children and adolescents with cancer. Promising activity, particularly in CNS tumors, warrants phase II evaluation of this regimen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document