Active surveillance and watchful waiting for low-risk prostate cancer in black patients: A population-based analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10-10
Author(s):  
Santino Butler ◽  
Vinayak Muralidhar ◽  
Anthony Victor D'Amico ◽  
Paul L. Nguyen ◽  
Timothy Rebbeck ◽  
...  

10 Background: Evidence from clinical trials supports conservative management as an acceptable alternative to definitive therapy for low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). The optimal approach for Black men, however, remains unclear given trial underrepresentation and concern about racial differences in disease aggressiveness. We therefore sought to determine U.S. conservative management utilization rates for Black men with LRPC. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program Prostate with Active Surveillance/Watchful Waiting (AS/WW) Database queried 50,302 LRPC patients (N = 5218 Black), diagnosed from 2010-2015. Trends in AS/WW utilization over time were determined, stratified by race (Black versus non-Black) and number of positive biopsy cores (≤2 versus ≥3). Results: From 2010 to 2015, AS/WW utilization increased from 12.6% to 36.4% among Black men (Ptrend< 0.001) and from 14.8% to 43.3% among non-Black men (Ptrend< 0.001). AS/WW rates reached 52.0% and 57.3% by 2015 for Black (Ptrend< 0.001) and non-Black (Ptrend< 0.001) men with ≤2 positive biopsy cores, respectively. Rates continually increased for all subgroups except Black men with ≥3 positive biopsy cores, where rates plateaued at 22.9% by 2013. Conclusions: In this report from the largest U.S. population of Black LRPC patients with quality assured AS/WW data, AS/WW rates have nearly tripled for Black men from 2010-2015, suggesting AS/WW is viewed as a safe management option in all races.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep R Mahal ◽  
Santino Butler ◽  
Idalid Ivy Franco ◽  
Luke Roy George Pike ◽  
Shuang Zhao ◽  
...  

12 Background: The optimal management for men age ≤55 with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is debated given quality of life implications with definitive treatment versus potential missed opportunity for cure with conservative management. We sought to define rates of conservative management for low-risk PCa and associated short-term outcomes in young versus older men in the United States (U.S.). Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Prostate with Active Surveillance/Watchful Waiting (AS/WW) Database identified 50,302 men diagnosed with low-risk PCa from 2010-2015. AS/WW rates in the U.S. were stratified by age (≤55 versus ≥56). Prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM)and overall mortality were defined by initial management type (AS/WW versus definitive treatment [referent]) and age. This non-public data was released by the SEER custom data group. Results: AS/WW utilization increased from 8.61% in 2010 to 34.56% in 2015 among men age ≤55 (Ptrend< 0.001) and from 15.99% to 43.81% among men age ≥56 (Ptrend< 0.001). Among patients with ≤2 positive biopsy cores, AS/WW rates increased from 12.90% to 48.78% for men age ≤55 and from 21.85% to 58.01% for men age ≥56. Among patients with ≥3 positive biopsy cores, AS/WW rates increased from 3.89% to 22.45% for men age ≤55 and from 10.05% to 28.49% for men age ≥56 (all Ptrend< 0.001). Five-year PCSM rates were below 0.30% across age and initial management type subgroups. Conclusions: AS/WW rates quadrupled for patients age ≤55 from 2010-2015, with favorable short-term outcomes. These findings demonstrate the short-term safety and increasing acceptance of AS/WW for both younger and older patients. However, there are still higher absolute rates of AS/WW in older patients (P < 0.001), suggesting some national ambivalence toward AS/WW in younger patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 534-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieke Van Hemelrijck ◽  
Hans Garmo ◽  
Lars Lindhagen ◽  
Ola Bratt ◽  
Pär Stattin ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 324 (17) ◽  
pp. 1733
Author(s):  
Xinglei Shen ◽  
Curtis A. Pettaway ◽  
Ronald C. Chen

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e297
Author(s):  
M.A. Mir Maresma ◽  
M. Ramirez-Backhaus ◽  
J.L. Dominguez-Escrig ◽  
J. Casanovas ◽  
I. Iborra ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 381 (26) ◽  
pp. 2581-2582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh ◽  
Xiaoyue Ma ◽  
Paul Christos ◽  
Jim C. Hu ◽  
Jonathan E. Shoag

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document