Comparison of PHI and PHI Density for Prostate Cancer Detection in a Large Retrospective Caucasian Cohort

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Beyond prostate-specific antigen (PSA), other biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are available and need to be evaluated for clinical routine. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to evaluate the Prostate Health Index (PHI) density (PHID) in comparison with PHI in a large Caucasian group &#x3e;1,000 men. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> PHID values were used from available patient data with PSA, free PSA, and [−2]pro­PSA and prostate volume from 3 former surveys from 2002 to 2014. Those 1,446 patients from a single-center cohort included 701 men with PCa and 745 with no PCa. All patients received initial or repeat biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing area under the ROC curves (AUCs), precision-recall approach, and decision curve analysis (DCA). <b><i>Results:</i></b> PHID medians differed almost 2-fold between PCa (1.12) and no PCa (0.62) in comparison to PHI (48.6 vs. 33; <i>p</i> always &#x3c;0.0001). However, PHID and PHI were equal regarding the AUC (0.737 vs. 0.749; <i>p</i> = 0.226), and the curves of the precision-recall analysis also overlapped in the sensitivity range between 70 and 100%. DCA had a maximum net benefit of only ∼5% for PHID versus PHI between 45 and 55% threshold probability. Contrary, in the 689 men with a prostate volume ≤40 cm³, PHI (AUC 0.732) showed a significant larger AUC than PHID (AUC 0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.014). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Based on DCA, PHID had only a small advantage in comparison with PHI alone, while ROC analysis and precision-recall analysis showed similar results. In smaller prostates, PHI even outperformed PHID. The increment for PHID in this large Caucasian cohort is too small to justify a routine clinical use.

Comparison of checkpoint inhibitor treatment-related cutaneous adverse events in racial and ethnic minority and Caucasian cohorts at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

2632 Background: Immune-related cutaneous adverse events (irCAEs) are the most common and often the first toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). In the general population, irCAEs occur on average within 3.6 weeks of treatment initiation and most commonly manifest as maculopapular rash, lichenoid rash, and pruritus. Less is known about these irCAEs in racial and ethnic minority patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the irCAEs of cohorts of Caucasian and racial and ethnic minority patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Methods: Herein, we conducted a retrospective chart review of racial and ethnic minority patients treated with CPIs between 2012-2019 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. irCAEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. These were compared to a Caucasian cohort matched by demographics and cancer therapy regimen. Results: One hundred ten racial and ethnic minority patients presented to dermatology for irCAEs. Our population consisted of 59 (53.6%) females and 51 (46.4%) males with a mean age of 59 (range 20-85). Of the patients who were seen by dermatology, 63/110 were Asian (57.3%) followed by 34/110 African American (30.9%), and 1 Native American. Twelve patients were of Hispanic ethnicity (10.9%), which included those of both African American and Caucasian race. The 110 patients that were evaluated by dermatology had 221 cutaneous adverse events. Rash (96, 43.4%), pruritus (40, 18.1%), and xerosis (23, 10.4%) were most frequently diagnosed (average time from treatment start to presentation was 125 days). Dermatology identified 87 (39.3%) grade 1, 103 (46.6%) grade 2, 30 (13.5%) grade 3, and 1 (0.4%) grade 4 events. There were 17 (15.5%) treatment interruptions, including 7 patients who required permanent discontinuation. In the Caucasian cohort, mean time to onset was 228 days (range 1-1500). Dermatology identified 48 (43.6%) grade 1, 44 (40.0%) grade 2, 18 (16.4%) grade 3, and 0 (0.0%) grade 4 events, with maculopapular rash (55, 50.0%) and pruritus (25, 22.7%) most frequently diagnosed. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that irCAEs occur frequently in cancer patients from racial and ethnic minority groups, with similar grade and morphology as Caucasian patients. When irCAEs develop in this population, the diagnosis occurred later than what has previously been reported, possibly due to these patients seeing MSK oncologists with an established dermatology consultation system and insight into how to manage these patients on their own. Prospective evaluation of underrepresented minorities receiving CPI therapy is warranted in order to identify risk factors and therapeutic strategies for these untoward events, so that optimal cancer care may be delivered.