Axillary management in T1-3N1M0 breast cancer patients with needle biopsy proven nodal metastases at presentation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ATNEC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS600-TPS600
Author(s):  
Amit Goyal ◽  
Sophie Cramp ◽  
Duncan Wheatley ◽  
Andrea Marshall ◽  
Shama Puri ◽  
...  

TPS600 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) results in eradication of cancer in the axillary nodes in 40% to 70% of patients. This raises questions about the benefit of further axillary treatment in those patients with no evidence of residual nodal disease (ypN0) after NACT. Methods: Design: ATNEC is a phase 3, randomised (1:1), multi-centre trial, with embedded economic evaluation, comparing standard axillary treatment (axillary lymph node dissection [ALND] or axillary radiotherapy [ART]) with no further axillary treatment in T1-3N1M0 breast cancer patients with needle biopsy proven axillary nodal metastases, who after NACT have no residual nodal disease (ypN0) on dual tracer sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and removal of at least 3 nodes (sentinel nodes and marked involved node). Stratification: Institution, type of surgery (breast conserving surgery vs mastectomy), receptor status (triple negative vs HER2 positive vs ER positive and/or PR positive and HER2 negative). Inclusion criteria are: Age ≥ 18, Male or female, T1-3N1M0 breast cancer at diagnosis (pre-NACT), FNA or core biopsy confirmed axillary nodal metastases at presentation, ER and HER2 status evaluated on primary tumour, received standard NACT as per local guidelines, ultrasound of the axilla at completion of NACT, dual tracer SNB after NACT and at least 3 nodes removed (sentinel nodes and marked node), no evidence of nodal metastases post NACT (ypN0). Exclusion criteria are: bilateral invasive breast cancer, SNB prior to NACT, marked node not removed except where at least one node removed shows evidence of down-staging with complete pathological response e.g. fibrosis/scarring and at least 3 nodes removed, previous ipsilateral axillary surgery, previous cancer within last 5 years or concomitant malignancy except basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, in situ carcinoma of the cervix, in situ or stage 1 melanoma, contra- or ipsilateral in situ breast cancer. Aims: To assess whether, omitting further axillary treatment (ALND and ART) for patients with early stage breast cancer and axillary nodal metastases on needle biopsy - who after NACT have no residual nodal disease on SNB (ypN0) - is non-inferior to axillary treatment in terms of disease free survival, and reduces the risk of lymphoedema at 5 years. Statistical methods: All analyses will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis to preserve randomisation, avoid bias from exclusions and preserve statistical power. Radiotherapy quality assurance: Study has in-built radiotherapy QA programme that will be co-ordinated by National Radiotherapy Trials QA (RTTQA) group. Target accrual: 1900. Trial status: Recruiting. Number of sites: 100. Clinical trial information: NCT04109079.

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 435
Author(s):  
Valentina Iotti ◽  
Moira Ragazzi ◽  
Giulia Besutti ◽  
Vanessa Marchesi ◽  
Sara Ravaioli ◽  
...  

This study aimed to evaluate contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) accuracy and reproducibility in the detection and measurement of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients with calcifications, using surgical specimen pathology as the reference. Pre- and post-NAC CEM images of 36 consecutive BC patients receiving NAC in 2012–2020, with calcifications in the tumor bed at diagnosis, were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists; described were absence/presence and size of residual disease based on contrast enhancement (CE) only and CE plus calcifications. Twenty-eight patients (77.8%) had invasive and 5 (13.9%) in situ-only residual disease at surgical specimen pathology. Considering CE plus calcifications instead of CE only, CEM sensitivity for invasive residual tumor increased from 85.7% (95% CI = 67.3–96%) to 96.4% (95% CI = 81.7–99.9) and specificity decreased from 5/8 (62.5%; 95% CI = 24.5–91.5%) to 1/8 (14.3%; 95% CI = 0.4–57.9%). For in situ-only residual disease, false negatives decreased from 3 to 0 and false positives increased from 1 to 2. CEM pathology concordance in residual disease measurement increased (R squared from 0.38 to 0.45); inter-reader concordance decreased (R squared from 0.79 to 0.66). Considering CE plus calcifications to evaluate NAC response in BC patients increases sensitivity in detection and accuracy in measurement of residual disease but increases false positives.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Abigail Suzanne Caudle ◽  
Wei Tse Yang ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Mittendorf ◽  
Dalliah MaShon Black ◽  
Michael Gilcrease ◽  
...  

99 Background: Staging of breast cancer patients is enhanced by axillary ultrasound (US) and needle biopsy of abnormal lymph nodes (LN). When clips are placed in sampled metastatic LNs, they can be evaluated for nodal response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). The goals of this study were to determine if pathologic changes in clipped LNs reflect nodal response to NCT and if targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which includes sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in addition to selective localization and removal of clipped LNs, could increase the accuracy of nodal assessment. Methods: This prospective study included patients with US-identified axillary metastases confirmed by needle biopsy with a clip placed in the sampled LN. After NCT, patients underwent axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) with x-ray of the axillary contents to identify the clip-containing LN. In 38 patients, the clipped LN was selectively removed using wire (n=2) or I125seed localization (n=36) before ALND was performed. Five patients did not undergo ALND. The pathologic findings of the clipped LN were reported separately from the other nodes. Results: Ninety node positive patients were enrolled. Forty (44%) had a complete nodal response to NCT and 50 (56%) had residual disease. Pathologic evaluation of the clipped LN revealed metastases in 47/50 patients with residual disease, resulting in a false negative rate (FNR) of 6% (95% CI 1.3-16.6). In 52 patients who underwent SLND, the clipped LN was not a SLN in 23% (n=12). Thirty-one of these patients had residual disease; metastases were not seen in SLNs in 5 cases resulting in a FNR for SLND alone of 16% (95% CI 5.4-34). Evaluation of the clipped LN in addition to SLND improved the FNR to 3% (1/31, 95% CI 0.1-17). Thirty-one patients underwent TAD while an additional 7 had localization and selective removal of the clipped LN without SLND with one false negative result. Conclusions: US-guided marking of LNs with documented metastatic disease allows for their selective removal and improved pathologic evaluation for residual nodal disease. The FNR of SLND can be reduced by ensuring removal and evaluation of the clipped LN. TAD is technically feasible and allows for improved assessment of nodal response after NCT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document