scholarly journals National Collaborative to Improve Oncology Practice: The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Experience

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 276-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Siegel ◽  
Steven B. Clauser ◽  
Jean M. Lynn

Collaboration between QOPI and the NCCCP sites represents an evolution in the QOPI process, in which QOPI provides a metric for measuring quality and serves as a springboard for comprehensive quality improvement across independent but mutually committed practices.

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e247-e254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Siegel ◽  
Kathleen M. Castro ◽  
Jana Eisenstein ◽  
Holley Stallings ◽  
Patricia D. Hegedus ◽  
...  

Using the NCCCP as a paradigm, QOPI metrics provide a useful platform for group-wide measurement of quality performance. Additionally, these measurements can assess the effectiveness of quality improvement initiatives.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e428-e433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Stover ◽  
Jessica A. Zerillo

Using a quality improvement (QI) paradigm, the authors conducted 11 multidisciplinary conferences throughout 2013-2014 at two tertiary academic cancer centers and a satellite community-based oncology practice. They present their approach including key components and an example case.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Robert D. Siegel ◽  
Holley Stallings ◽  
Donna M. Bryant ◽  
Pamela Kadlubek ◽  
Laurel Borowski ◽  
...  

208 Background: The NCCCP is a network of community based institutions from New England to Hawaii funded by the NCI. Quality of care is a priority of the NCCCP with participation in ASCO’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) playing a fundamental role. QOPI provides a process for quality assessment but we have also used it as a measure of quality improvement (QI) network-wide. Using QOPI methodology, we have analyzed our performance twice a year in an effort to enhance our implementation of quality indicators relevant to program aims. Methods: A data sharing agreement allows individual practice QOPI data to be electronically sent to the NCI where it is aggregated with the other NCCCP QOPI participants. Data are presented via webinar within the network using a variety of QI strategies. For example, blinded site performance distributions are benchmarked against NCCCP national averages on specific indicators. High performing practices voluntarily present their QI initiatives and best practices to the network. The NCCCP Quality of Care Subcommittee then selects QI projects and areas to focus quality improvement efforts. Results: In Spring 2012, 44 practices affiliated with 25 NCCCP sites participated in QOPI, a consistent pattern since Fall 2010. The table below describes the percent compliance with certain QOPI measures for the NCCCP aggregate over time. Selected measures were perceived as having had suboptimal compliance in Fall 2010. Conclusions: QOPI is an effective tool for assessing quality within a network and for measuring quality improvement efforts. Best practices from within the network can be leveraged and disseminated to enhance the quality of cancer care. This methodology facilitates quality initiatives despite the logistical challenges of working with practices across the country. [Table: see text]


Medical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 606-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Merkow ◽  
David J. Bentrem ◽  
Jeanette W. Chung ◽  
Jennifer L. Paruch ◽  
Clifford Y. Ko ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-124
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Kilpatrick ◽  
Kathleen B. Cartmell ◽  
Abdoulaye Diedhiou ◽  
K. Michael Cummings ◽  
Graham W. Warren ◽  
...  

Introduction: Continued smoking by cancer patients causes adverse cancer treatment outcomes, but few patients receive evidence-based smoking cessation as a standard of care.Aim: To evaluate practical strategies to promote wide-scale dissemination and implementation of evidence-based tobacco cessation services within state cancer centers.Methods: A Collaborative Learning Model (CLM) for Quality Improvement was evaluated with three community oncology practices to identify barriers and facilitate practice change to deliver evidence-based smoking cessation treatments to cancer patients using standardized assessments and referrals to statewide smoking cessation resources. Patients were enrolled and tracked through an automated data system and received follow-up cessation support post-enrollment. Monthly quantitative reports and qualitative data gathered through interviews and collaborative learning sessions were used to evaluate meaningful quality improvement changes in each cancer center.Results: Baseline practice evaluation for the CLM identified the lack of tobacco use documentation, awareness of cessation guidelines, and awareness of services for patients as common barriers. Implementation of a structured assessment and referral process demonstrated that of 1,632 newly registered cancer patients,1,581 (97%) were screened for tobacco use. Among those screened, 283 (18%) were found to be tobacco users. Of identified tobacco users, 207 (73%) were advised to quit. Referral of new patients who reported using tobacco to an evidence-based cessation program increased from 0% at baseline across all three cancer centers to 64% (range = 30%–89%) during the project period.Conclusions: Implementation of quality improvement learning collaborative models can dramatically improve delivery of guideline-based tobacco cessation treatments to cancer patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Day ◽  
Liyang Tang ◽  
Maher Karam-Hage ◽  
Carole Fakhry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document