scholarly journals Disparities in Geographic Accessibility of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers in the United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanqing Xu ◽  
Cong Fu ◽  
Tracy Onega ◽  
Xun Shi ◽  
Fahui Wang
2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna S. Zhukovsky ◽  
Jessica P. Hwang ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
Jie Willey ◽  
Anne L. Flamm ◽  
...  

1965 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-236
Author(s):  
Umberto Veronesi ◽  
Giorgio Pizzocaro ◽  
Aldo Vittorio Bono

From 1937 to 1960, 1051 women with cystic disease of the breast were hospitalized at the National Cancer Institute of Milan; 1008 of them were followed for a period ranging from 1 to 26 years, with an average of 8.5 years. All cases were histologically proved. Twenty-one of the patients developed a cancer of the breast; 16 in the breast with the cystic disease, 5 in the contralateral breast. In 667 cases the disease was histologically classified as «simple cystic disease »; 12 of these cases had a breast cancer. In 384 cases the disease was classififed as «hyperplastic cystic disease»; 9 of these developed a cancer of the breast. The follow-up of the 1008 cases provided 8539 person-years at risk; the number of the expected breast cases was calculated on the basis of the Dorn and Cutler data on morbidity of cancer in 10 metropolitan areas of the United States. The number of expected breast cancer was 12.2; the number of observed cases was 21, the ratio between observed and expected cases being 1.71.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 893-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brice A. P. Wilson ◽  
Christopher C. Thornburg ◽  
Curtis J. Henrich ◽  
Tanja Grkovic ◽  
Barry R. O'Keefe

The National Cancer Institute of the United States (NCI) has initiated a Cancer Moonshot program entitled the NCI Program for Natural Product Discovery.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1058-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Beamer ◽  
Marcia L. Grant ◽  
Carin R. Espenschied ◽  
Kathleen R. Blazer ◽  
Heather L. Hampel ◽  
...  

Purpose Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 protein expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) are well-established tools to screen for Lynch syndrome (LS). Although many cancer centers have adopted these tools as reflex LS screening after a colorectal cancer diagnosis, the standard of care has not been established, and no formal studies have described this practice in the United States. The purpose of this study was to describe prevalent practices regarding IHC/MSI reflex testing for LS in the United States and the subsequent follow-up of abnormal results. Materials and Methods A 12-item survey was developed after interdisciplinary expert input. A letter of invitation, survey, and online-survey option were sent to a contact at each cancer program. A modified Dillman strategy was used to maximize the response rate. The sample included 39 National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCI-CCCs), 50 randomly selected American College of Surgeons–accredited Community Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Programs (COMPs), and 50 Community Hospital Cancer Programs (CHCPs). Results The overall response rate was 50%. Seventy-one percent of NCI-CCCs, 36% of COMPs, and 15% of CHCPs were conducting reflex IHC/MSI for LS; 48% of the programs used IHC, 14% of the programs used MSI, and 38% of the programs used both IHC and MSI. One program used a presurgical information packet, four programs offered an opt-out option, and none of the programs required written consent. Conclusion Although most NCI-CCCs use reflex IHC/MSI to screen for LS, this practice is not well-adopted by community hospitals. These findings may indicate an emerging standard of care and diffusion from NCI-CCC to community cancer programs. Our findings also described an important trend away from requiring written patient consent for screening.


Endoscopy ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (09) ◽  
pp. 617-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Greenwald ◽  
G. Kelloff ◽  
S. Kalagher ◽  
S. McDonald

Author(s):  
Catherine C. Pollack ◽  
Tracy Onega ◽  
Jennifer A. Emond ◽  
Soroush Vosoughi ◽  
A. James O’Malley ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1718-1723 ◽  
Author(s):  
R W Frelick

PURPOSE To review the growth of community physicians' involvement in National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical research trials as a significant contribution to cancer control, and to show their impact, not yet fully realized, on cancer morbidity and mortality in the United States. DESIGN Background information, based on the personal experience of participants, as well as a review of pertinent literature, portrays the evolution of the clinical research component of community oncology in the United States over the last 25 years. RESULTS Data from Community Clinical Oncology Programs (CCOPs) I and II have been used to outline some of the results of this far-reaching program. CONCLUSION The CCOP was introduced at an appropriate time to expand the clinical trial resources of the NCI, while at the same time helping community oncologists practice state-of-the-art cancer management found in the research protocols. This in turn provided improved resources to manage cancer patients, as most of them are treated in their own communities. CCOPs have also indirectly had a positive impact on the trial processes of the NCI cooperative groups and comprehensive cancer centers, and have helped to widen the scope and hasten progress in cancer-control research and practice.


2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (7) ◽  
pp. 766-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Salotto ◽  
Jack Sariego

Studies have suggested that outcomes from breast cancer are improved when treatment is rendered at high-volume teaching centers. The current study was undertaken to examine the impact of facility type on the presentation and treatment of “early” breast carcinoma across the United States. Breast cancer data were available from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database. The cohort consisted of 305,358 patients presenting with in situ cancers and no prior treatment from 2000 to 2008. Data were stratified by type of treatment facility, “invasive” versus “noninvasive” nature of the tumor, and treatment performed. Only 15 per cent of patients presented to community cancer centers (CCCs). Despite this, a greater percentage presented with invasive disease at CCCs (82.1%) compared with comprehensive community cancer centers (CCCCs; 80%) or teaching/research facilities (T/Rs; 70.2%). In examining the in situ cohort, a higher percentage of patients at CCCs were treated with breast conservation than at CCCCs or T/Rs. Although small, these differences were statistically significant. These data do not support the contention that only “early” cases of breast cancer present and are treated at community centers. In early breast cancer, patients are as likely to receive state-of-the-art treatment at a CCC as they are at a T/R.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document