Needs and Perspectives of Cancer Center Stakeholders for Access to Patient Values in the Electronic Health Record

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali V. Desai ◽  
Rajiv Agarwal ◽  
Andrew S. Epstein ◽  
Gilad J. Kuperman ◽  
Chelsea L. Michael ◽  
...  

QUESTION ASKED: What is the most important information that diverse institutional stakeholders at a comprehensive cancer center need to know about patients to provide patient-centered care, and what is the best way to display this information in a new single-location feature in the electronic health record (EHR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Thematic content analysis of semistructured interviews with a large and diverse group of institutional stakeholders at our comprehensive cancer center revealed themes informing design and development of the Patient Values Tab EHR feature, generated enthusiasm and buy-in for this digital innovation, created a sense of awareness among future users, and paved the way for implementation. WHAT WE DID: Qualitative data were collected through in-person, guide-based, audio-recorded, individual interviews with a total of 110 stakeholders representing a wide range of disciplines and professions, as well as others involved in administration of the hospital or clinics within our cancer center. WHAT WE FOUND: Respondents felt that to facilitate the delivery of patient-centered care, information in the following categories should be displayed: the patient's personhood, support system and resources, social history, communication preferences, future planning, end of life, and illness and treatment understanding. Other important themes that arose in the interviews included implementation considerations, improved communication and relationship building, and privacy implications. BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTORS, DRAWBACKS, REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS: Since this study was conducted at a single dedicated cancer center, generalizability of findings across other healthcare settings merits further investigation. It is possible that non–English-speaking clinicians and patients, who were not interviewed, might have different needs or perspectives. We designed our Patient Values Tab for our institution's EHR (Allscripts); however, this display feature can be configured in other EHR software. By interviewing a large and varying sample of stakeholders and rigorously analyzing their responses, we obtained robust results to inform the development and implementation of this innovative EHR feature centralizing key information needed to enhance patient-centered cancer care. The introduction of the new Patient Values Tab at this well-known cancer center signals the importance of patient personhood and values throughout the institution and advances the use of the EHR as a driver of the delivery of patient-centered care throughout the illness.

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1075-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne H. Gross ◽  
Ryan K. Leib ◽  
Anne Tonachel ◽  
Richard Tonachel ◽  
Danielle M. Bowers ◽  
...  

This article describes how trust among team members and in the technology supporting them was eroded during implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) in an adult outpatient oncology practice at a comprehensive cancer center. Delays in care of a 38-year-old woman with high-risk breast cancer occurred because of ineffective team communication and are illustrated in a case study. The case explores how the patient’s trust and mutual trust between team members were disrupted because of inaccurate assumptions about the functionality of the EHR’s communication tool, resultant miscommunications between team members and the patient, and the eventual recognition that care was not being effectively coordinated, as it had been previously. Despite a well-established, team-based culture and significant preparation for the EHR implementation, the challenges that occurred point to underlying human and system failures from which other organizations going through a similar process may learn. Through an analysis and evaluation of events that transpired before and during the EHR rollout, suggested interventions for preventing this experience are offered, which include: a thorough crosswalk between old and new communication mechanisms before implementation; understanding and mitigation of gaps in the communication tool’s functionality; more robust training for staff, clinicians, and patients; greater consideration given to the pace of change expected of individuals; and development of models of collaboration between EHR users and vendors in developing products that support high-quality, team-based care in the oncology setting. These interventions are transferable to any organizational or system change that threatens mutual trust and effective communication.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-170
Author(s):  
Soraya Arzhan ◽  
Christos Argyropoulos ◽  
Maria-Eleni Roumelioti

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-240.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
June Tome ◽  
Shahbaz Ahmed ◽  
Angela Fagerlin ◽  
Corey Powell ◽  
Marcio Mourao ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Street ◽  
Lin Liu ◽  
Neil J. Farber ◽  
Yunan Chen ◽  
Alan Calvitti ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. 1230-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Silverman ◽  
Yun-Xian Ho ◽  
Susan Kaib ◽  
Wendy Danto Ellis ◽  
Marícela P. Moffitt ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alex T Ramsey ◽  
Ami Chiu ◽  
Timothy Baker ◽  
Nina Smock ◽  
Jingling Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Tobacco smoking is an important risk factor for cancer incidence, an effect modifier for cancer treatment, and a negative prognostic factor for disease outcomes. Inadequate implementation of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment in cancer centers, a consequence of numerous patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers, contributes to tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. This study provides data for a paradigm shift from a frequently used specialist referral model to a point-of-care treatment model for tobacco use assessment and cessation treatment for outpatients at a large cancer center. The point-of-care model is enabled by a low-burden strategy, the Electronic Health Record-Enabled Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment program, which was implemented in the cancer center clinics on June 2, 2018. Five-month pre- and post-implementation data from the electronic health record (EHR) were analyzed. The percentage of cancer patients assessed for tobacco use significantly increased from 48% to 90% (z = 126.57, p < .001), the percentage of smokers referred for cessation counseling increased from 0.72% to 1.91% (z = 3.81, p < .001), and the percentage of smokers with cessation medication significantly increased from 3% to 17% (z = 17.20, p < .001). EHR functionalities may significantly address barriers to point-of-care treatment delivery, improving its consistent implementation and thereby increasing access to and quality of smoking cessation care for cancer center patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document