Land Use in the U.S.

Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e00125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Nocentini ◽  
John Field ◽  
Andrea Monti ◽  
Keith Paustian




1989 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Cervero

This paper argues that the low-density, single-use character of most suburban workplaces in the U.S. has contributed to worsening traffic congestion by making most workers highly dependent on their own automobiles for accessing jobs. To test this proposition, land use and transportation data are examined for fifty of the largest suburban employment centers in the nation. Differences in the share of trips made by various modes, commuting speeds, and levels of service on major thoroughfares connecting suburban centers are compared among clusters of centers. The densities, sizes, and land use mixtures of suburban workplaces are generally found to be important determinants of worker travel behavior and local traffic conditions.



2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Herkenhoff ◽  
Lee Ohanian ◽  
Edward Prescott
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  


2021 ◽  
pp. 153851322110475
Author(s):  
Francine S. Romero

When the 1926 Euclid v. Ambler decision found municipal zoning valid under the U.S. Constitution, previous state cases opposing the practice were overruled and subsequently almost forgotten. This investigation analyzes those early State Supreme Court cases to determine systematically the basis of these rejections. After constructing a contextual background of the legal arguments that could have been used by the judges, I assess cases to determine which were used, and find a dominance of concern regarding land use segregation justified by municipalities through an “aesthetics” defense. I conclude by considering links between these cases and current controversies.



2018 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 89-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle F. Herkenhoff ◽  
Lee E. Ohanian ◽  
Edward C. Prescott
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  


1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 40-41

As a regular feature of PA, Washington Watch is designed to keep readers abreast of recent and pending legislation as well as congressional hearings and federal agency directives, regulations, and initiatives which may have an impact on the work of anthropologists or to which anthropologists may be able to contribute. In this issue, James Rotholz, Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Washington State University, discusses one example of conflict over environmental protection and land use policy that is occurring in many parts of the U.S. today. He suggests several ways in which anthropologists, through their analyses and through mediation and brokerage, may be able to help resolve these conflicts.



1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1344-1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin P. Gallo ◽  
Timothy W. Owen ◽  
David R. Easterling ◽  
Paul F. Jamason


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document