Localized vs Central Station Power Generation

Author(s):  
Valentyn Barannik ◽  
Maksym Burlaka ◽  
Leonid Moroz ◽  
Abdul Nassar

Central-station power plants (CSPP) are the main provider of energy today. In the process of power generation at central-power stations, about 67% of primary energy is wasted. Distributed cogeneration or combined heat and power (CHP) systems are an alternative to central-station power plants. In these systems, an electrical generation system located in a residence or at a commercial site consumes natural gas to generate electricity locally and then the exhaust heat is utilized for local heating needs (in contrast to being wasted at central-stations). Microturbines offer a number of potential advantages compared to other technologies for small-scale power generation. For example, compact size and low-weight leading to reduced civil engineering costs, a small number of moving parts, lower noise and vibration, multi-fuel capabilities, low maintenance cost as well as opportunities for lower emissions. Inverter generators allow using micro-turbines of different shaft rotation speed that opens opportunities to unit optimization at off-design modes. The common approach to predict the off-design performance of gas turbine unit is the mapping of the compressor and the turbine separately and the consequent matching of common operation points. However, the above-mentioned approach might be rather inaccurate if the unit has some secondary flows. In this article an alternative approach for predicting off-design performance without using component maps is presented. Here the off-design performance is done by direct calculation of the components performances. On each off-design mode, the recalculation of the characteristic of all scheme components, including a compressor, gas turbine, combustor, recuperator and secondary flow system is performed. The different approaches for obtaining the performance at off-design modes considering the peculiarities of the gas turbine engine are presented in this paper.


Energy ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.K. Drost ◽  
Z.I. Antoniak ◽  
D.R. Brown ◽  
S. Somasundaram

1991 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.E. Rice ◽  
W.M. Grady ◽  
W.G. Lesso ◽  
A.H. Noyola ◽  
M.E. Connolly

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (Number 1) ◽  
pp. 55-67
Author(s):  
Shafini M. Shafie ◽  
Zakirah Othman ◽  
N Hami

Malaysia has an abundance of biomass resources that can be utilised for power generation. One of them is paddy residue. Paddy residue creates ahuge potential in the power generation sector. The consumption of paddy residue can help Malaysia become less dependent on conventional sources of energy, mitigate greenhouse gas(GHG) emission, offer positive feedback in the economic sector, and at the same time, provide thebest solution for waste management activities. The forecast datafor 20 years on electricity generation wasused to calculate the GHG emission and its saving when paddy residue is used for electricity generation. The government’scost saving was also identified when paddy residue substituted coal fuel in electricity generation.This paper can provide forecast information so that Malaysia is able to move forward to apply paddy residue as feedstock in energy supply. Hopefully, the data achieved can encourage stakeholder bodies in the implementation of paddy residue inelectricity generation since there is apositive impact towardscost and emission saving.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document