Low Flow and Instream Flow Requirements

Author(s):  
Salvatore Alecci ◽  
Giuseppe Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Low Flow ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Caissie ◽  
Nassir El-Jabi

Five hydrologically based instream flow assessment methods are compared for 70 rivers in Atlantic Canada; these methods included (i) Tennant method; (ii) 25% mean annual flow (25% MAF); (iii) median monthly flow (Q50) which includes the aquatic base flow (ABF); (iv) the flow equalled or exceeded 90% of time on a monthly flow duration curve (Q90); and (v) the statistical 7-day low flow frequency of a 10-year recurrence interval (7Q10). By comparing the different methods relative to the 25% MAF (the commonly used method in Atlantic Canada), we found that the Q90 and 7Q10 methods predicted extremely low instream flows during winter and summer months. Resource management decisions based on these extremely low flow predictions could have serious adverse consequences. The median monthly flow method (Q50) was recommended for gauged basins, whereas the Tennant method, the 25% MAF method, and the ABF methods were recommended for ungauged basins. For ungauged basins, we conducted a regional study to estimate the 25% MAF and the ABF using multiple regression analysis. Physiographic parameters were used as explanatory variables in the regression analysis. Based on the coefficient of determination, R2, the best regression results were obtained for the 25% MAF with R2 ranging from 0.957 to 0.999. Although the results for ABF were slightly lower than for the 25% MAF, R2 was still in the range of 0.868 to 0.979. Key words: environmental assessment, maintenance flow, low flow, aquatic resources.


Water Policy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1240-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Praskievicz ◽  
Cehong Luo ◽  
Bennett Bearden ◽  
Andrew Ernest

Abstract Environmental instream flows are a common tool for maintaining river flows that are required to sustain both ecosystem and societal needs. Many of the most widely adopted environmental flow standards are based on historical flow, mainly because of the relative simplicity of these methods. Few previous studies, however, have examined the ability of historical flow standards to protect low flows. Here, the low-flow protective ability of five different historical flow methods, using 35 gaging stations in the Tombigbee River Basin of Alabama and Mississippi, was analyzed. The minimum environmental flow thresholds were calculated using the five indices, and the number of times in a recent 32-year period flows fell below each threshold was determined. The Tennant-based threshold was reached most frequently, followed by the modified Tennant. Although other low-flow metrics, such as 7Q10, were triggered infrequently (9% of the time) over the whole period, triggering rates increased to 46% for 7Q10 during the drought of 2016, suggesting that even minimal low-flow standards may provide some benefit during drought. Analyzing historical flow methods to see how often they would result in management actions if implemented is a useful way of developing guidance on the adoption of minimum environmental instream flow standards.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 314-315
Author(s):  
Jose A. Medina Machuca ◽  
Jose A. Medina Coello ◽  
Hugo Manzanilla ◽  
Francisco A. Gutierrez
Keyword(s):  
Low Flow ◽  

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S678-S678
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Akazawa ◽  
Yasuhiro Katsura ◽  
Ryohei Matsuura ◽  
Piao Rishu ◽  
Ansar M D Ashik ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document